352
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, 75, sparked raised eyebrows over his whereabouts when he was absent during oral arguments on Monday, and the Court provided no explanation.

Chief Justice John Roberts addressed Thomas' lack of presence, according to NBC News' Lawrence Hurley, saying that Thomas "is not on the bench today" but would "participate fully" in the two cases being argued based on the briefs and transcripts.

"Context that may or may not be helpful: In the recent past, Justice Thomas phoned into oral arguments when he couldn't attend in person, allowing him to ask questions remotely. He isn't doing so this time," wrote Slate reporter Mark Joseph Stern on X, formerly Twitter.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 193 points 2 months ago
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 62 points 2 months ago

He's just getting told what his vote will be.

[-] andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun 9 points 2 months ago

Picking out colors for the granite in his next RV actually.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 99 points 2 months ago

If I didn't call or show up a few times to my job I'd be fired. Different rules.

[-] TheAuthor_13@lemm.ee 50 points 2 months ago

Your first mistake was not getting a job with a lifetime appointment… bet you’re kicking yourself now, huh bub?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

Your job probably has a code of conduct, unlike SCOTUS.

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Fingers crossed he's fuck'n dead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 73 points 2 months ago

So a Supreme Court justice can work remotely, but federal employees must be in an office.

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago

Wait, did he take the deal that John Oliver proposed?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago

I think the clock ran out on that to be honest. He'd probably agree to it anyway so long as that pos vacates.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 57 points 2 months ago

Don't mind me I'm just going to head out and pick up some party supplies just in case

[-] revelrous@sopuli.xyz 38 points 2 months ago

Don't you jinx this.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] geekworking@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago

He's waiting for the check to clear.

[-] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe he's fucking dead

Edit: fuck.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 months ago

Don't. Don't give me hope.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

He's taken the next logical step from "Napping through Oral Arguments" and is now skipping the actual hearings entirely.

He'll show up for five minutes to tell his clerks how to write their opinions, then catch the next flight out to a Bohemian Grove. Unless someone smuggles a syphilitic child into the old people Adrenochrome orgy, dude is going to live for another 70 years.

[-] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 38 points 2 months ago

I thought it said “Clarence Thomas missing eyebrows” and honestly that would make his face look as soulless as his soul is

[-] KammicRelief@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

LOL I came in to post similar.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago

Fingers crossed for the best outcome!

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

His flight from Moscow was delayed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

So the dude is literally phoning it in?

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 46 points 2 months ago

He's not even doing that any more.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago

I hope his RV didn’t roll over him while he was trying to load up his 9 foot long blackstone

[-] Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 months ago

Excuse you.. it's a motor coach. They're completely different.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Oops sorry!

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When reached for comment Chief Justice Roberts relayed the events that occurred that morning leading to Justice Thomas's unplanned absence. "I called him up and said, dude, you're on the schedule to work this morning. Where the hell are you? And he said 'bro, I'm like totally hung over. I was partying with these insurrectionists last night at a rooftop rave rolling my balls off. Babe, can you hand me that water bottle? No, that wasn't talking you Bob. Can you, like, call Ruth to cover?' And I'm like 'Hey asshole, I'm tired of covering your damn shifts. Ruth doesn't work here anymore, and you know that. Get your ass in here or I'm marking you as 'unexcused absence'. And he's like 'no can do, bro. I'm Audi 5000 today, see ya!' and then he totally hung up! I swear, I don't even think he wants this job anymore. I wish he'd fuckin' quit already."

Wow, I never knew such drama exists so high in our third brand government. Is this what the framers intended?

[-] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago

The most annoying part of this is that even if he quits wasting our oxygen, it's "too close to the election" for the Senate to do their jobs and confirm the replacement.

[-] macarthur_park@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

Nah, democrats have a majority in the senate and republicans removed the ability to filibuster Supreme Court confirmations in order to seat Gorsuch. The 60 vote requirement was still in place in 2016 when democrats tried to fill scalia’s seat, and enough democrats were unwilling to change the rules to remove that requirement. Now that it’s gone there shouldn’t be any issue confirming a new justice.

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 2 months ago

Expecting Democrats to not tie their own hands here is... optimistic.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago

If Donald Trump gets to appoint like half of the supreme court during his overall tenure I'm gonna shit his pants

[-] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 2 months ago

Frantically searching for News reports of tragic motorhome accidents.

[-] Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago

Presumably the Yacht had engine trouble and he and Crowe are on an island with Ginger, Maryanne, and the captain.

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Time for “Weekend at Thomas’”

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

They could be AI phoning in his voice - not too different than his usual puppeteeing

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Probably on some billionaires private island sipping margaritas. Nothing to worry about.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 10 points 2 months ago

Really hoping he calls in for oral arguments tomorrow and its really a morning radio prank show.

[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Maybe he took John Oliver up on that sweet RV

[-] TetraVega@lemmings.world 4 points 2 months ago

It's a motor coach

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Hopefully he just doesn't ever come back

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Justice Long Dong Silver was too busy in Mitch McConnell's sex dungeon and missed his private flight?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 2 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


"Context that may or may not be helpful: In the recent past, Justice Thomas phoned into oral arguments when he couldn't attend in person, allowing him to ask questions remotely.

His time on the Court has drawn plenty of ridicule, notably in recent years following an April 2023 report by ProPublica that found that he had accepted luxury trips almost annually for more than two decades as the beneficiary of Dallas businessman and Republican mega-donor Harlan Crow and never disclosed them.

Last October, the Democrat-led Senate Judiciary Committee moved to subpoena Crow and other donors, calling it part of a wide-ranging ethics crisis.

Crow told Newsweek via email at the time that any such subpoena would be "nothing more than a stunt aimed at undermining Justice Thomas, but his office would "remain committed to respectful cooperation and a fair resolution."

Thomas received more grief last month after participating in the Supreme Court's decision to put presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump back on primary ballots in multiple states after he was removed in accordance to Section 3 of the Constitution, which bars former officeholders who "engaged in insurrection" from holding office again.

The justice was encouraged by many to recuse himself based on the ruling and ties with his own wife, whose actions surrounding the last presidential election have been put in the spotlight.


The original article contains 515 words, the summary contains 224 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Anyone have his address? We should send him cards.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Thoughts and prayers too!!!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
352 points (98.9% liked)

politics

18065 readers
4342 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS