972
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LdyMeow@sh.itjust.works 93 points 7 months ago

Is…. Is that a real tweet?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 84 points 7 months ago
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 65 points 7 months ago

nflation Stings Most If You Earn Less Than $300K. Here's How to Deal.

More Americans than ever expect their finances to worsen as inflation hits a 40-year high. Do you really need that extra car? March 13, 2022 at 12:00 PM UTC By Teresa Ghilarducci Teresa Ghilarducci is the Schwartz Professor of Economics at the New School for Social Research. She's the co-author of "Rescuing Retirement" and a member of the board of directors of the Economic Policy Institute.

Time for the bus?

Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg In this Article Crude Oil 81.69USD/bbl. +0.09% Before it’s here, it’s on the Bloomberg Terminal LEARN MORE This article is for subscribers only.

If your income is more than $289,000 a year, the run-up in gas prices may be alarming — but it's unlikely to hammer your overall finances. After all, Americans at that level spend no more than 1% of their take-home pay on gas and oil, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

For those earning much less, it’s a different story. Those at the median, with income of about $50,000, spend more than 3% of it on gas and motor oil. Low-income households making between $7,000 and $19,000 spend about 9%. The latest inflation numbers show gas prices jumped 6.6% in February from a month earlier — even before President Joe Biden banned U.S. imports of Russian oil. BloombergOpinion Vladimir Putin's Biggest Weapon Is Western Fear E-Bikes Aren’t Making New York Any Deadlier If You’re Walking Supreme Court Scoffs at Flimsy Abortion Pill Argument Stop Applying My Recession Rule to Individual States

Economists say the overall share of income spent on gas is lower than it used to be, and despite the increases, prices are still relatively low by historical standards. That’s true, but it offers little consolation these days for someone on the lower end of the income distribution who drives to work.

Food prices are also up, posting their biggest monthly increase since April 2020. There, too, those making less than $19,000 spend much more of their income — almost 15% — compared with higher earners, whose total food spending is just 4% of their income. Households with income of about $50,000 spend 8.5% of it on food.

The most recent barometer of consumer sentiment showed the highest-ever share of Americans expecting their finances to worsen in the coming year. About 54% think their incomes will lag behind inflation in the year ahead — a pretty high percentage historically.

I expect those most affected will adjust to inflation in the classic way by shifting away from relatively expensive items toward close substitutes. Here are some ideas on how to reconfigure consumption and lessen the blow. But again, adjustment is hard for people without savings or choices.

First, you have to know your budget to control your budget. Budgeting takes effort, but it gives you power. And that power is even more important in inflationary times.

To deal with gas prices, it’s worth reconsidering public transportation if it’s an option where you live. Fares are up about 8% compared with 38% for gasoline. Now may even be the time to sell your car. It certainly isn’t the time to buy a new or used one. Prices have stabilized a bit, but used-car prices are still up more than 40% from a year ago, and new ones are up 12%.

When it comes to food, don’t be afraid to explore. Prices for animal-based food products will certainly increase. Ukraine and Russia supply a significant amount of corn and barley to the world market, mainly to feed livestock for human food. Meat prices have increased about 14% from February 2021 and will go up even more. Though your palate may not be used to it, tasty meat substitutes include vegetables (where prices are up a little over 4%, or lentils and beans, which are up about 9%). Plan to cut out the middle creature and consume plants directly. It's a more efficient, healthier and cheaper way to get calories.

And stay away from buying in bulk — you usually don’t save any money by buying more. Sure, there may be great deals, but most consumers wind up falling for the tricks that entice them to spend more — things like offering free samples, which often leads to impulse buying, or placing discounted big-ticket items near the entrance. If you absolutely must buy in bulk, try to do it with a friend, so you can split some of the costs and ensure everything gets eaten or used.

Aside from being more thoughtful about purchases, it’s also prudent to think about unnecessary charges. So review your credit card to make sure there aren’t any unwanted recurring ones.

If you’re one of the many Americans who became a new pet owner during the pandemic, you might want to rethink those costly pet medical needs. It may sound harsh, but researchers actually don’t recommend pet chemotherapy — which can cost up to $10,000 — for ethical reasons.

Coping with inflation could mean drastic actions or small ones. There are lots of ways people can duck and dance around relative price changes. The Bureau of Labor Statistics found people in recessions hold off on buying cars, furniture and appliances. Though they don't cut back on travel, they do cut back on restaurants.

Try to be as flexible and creative as possible. Scientists tell us our brain plasticity will improve by trying novel things. There's an advantage to mixing up what you consume to cope with unusual price spikes: You become more resilient as you create a locus of control and interrogate your habits.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story: Teresa Ghilarducci at tghilarducci@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Alexis Leondis at aleondis@bloomberg.net

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 52 points 7 months ago

If you’re one of the many Americans who became a new pet owner during the pandemic, you might want to rethink those costly pet medical needs. It may sound harsh, but researchers actually don’t recommend pet chemotherapy — which can cost up to $10,000 — for ethical reasons.

Who are these researchers, lady? What makes it unethical to cure a dog's illness?

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 60 points 7 months ago

It's absolutely ridiculous to even talk about this in the context of inflation and family budgeting. Fucking boomer bullshit is what it is.

However, to answer your question, there is a gray area for when to treat pets' illnesses. Dogs can't tell you how much it hurts, or ask for pain killers, or understand why this is happening. Chemo fucking sucks, can make your dogs lose their appetite, and won't necessarily extend the life of your pet.

Whether you treat your pet or not depends on how old they are, where the cancer is, how big they are, and another 20 or so factors your vet will discuss with you. It may or may not be in their best interest, and it may or may not be economically feasible to treat it. Those are two different questions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 41 points 7 months ago

Chemo is fucking awful. Had a gf survive breast cancer (before we met) and the thing traumatized her so much it came up in conversation several times a day, years after the fact. Mom just died of breast cancer. All chemo did was steal the last 2-months of her life.

Want to put your pet through that? For what will likely mean them dying miserably anyway?

Here's some more info, too fucking depressing to really read top to bottom:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6681408

Seriously weird thing to bring up in an article regarding inflation and spending. Tacky at best. The author must have suffered something to have put that in there. The editor should have yanked it for sounding callous.

tl;dr: I see it as an ethical decision, not a financial one.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Your link didn't work.

Also:

Will chemotherapy make my pet sick?

Chemotherapy is very well tolerated in most dogs and cats. Most patients experience no side effects. Around 15% will have mild side effects that will last for a few days and many will improve on their own. About 5% of patients can experience more moderate side effects and less than 1% can have more severe/fatal side effects. Cats tend to tolerate chemotherapy even better than dogs, and both tend to handle chemotherapy better than people.

https://www.advetcc.com/cancer-care/frequently-asked-questions-about-chemotherapy/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 7 months ago

Actually, I stopped to think it over. I might have to agree, depending on how much the dog would feel like shit vs the likelihood of a full recovery and also depending on the age.

The dog doesn't have a say in the treatment, nor an explanation of what's happening. If the vet and I discussed and determined that the outcome might be cruel for not much hope of gain, I'd make a plan with the vet to let my pal suffer the least amount possible.

This is far from a blanket endorsement to euthanize dogs with cancer, which should go without sayin.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

It's paywalled though.

The irony is strong with this one.

[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Stop feeding your dog so you can afford our subscription.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 80 points 7 months ago
[-] Ragdoll_X@lemmy.world 44 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Believe me I will not shed a single tear if you shoplift from Walmart or Target or whatever.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

Never saw a thing. Never will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hegar@kbin.social 74 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Are you struggling with rising costs? Finding it difficult to live in a society which the rich warp to serve only their needs?

Have you tried just having a much shittier life?

Across the globe, the most successful have already accepted you having a much shittier life, and it's working great for them!

Try a shittier life today! A shittier life: if you deserved more, you would've been born rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mastod0n@lemmy.world 51 points 7 months ago

The horrible implications about your pets aside, you'd think economists understand what selling your car means in terms of employability.

[-] mortimerkahn@sh.itjust.works 37 points 7 months ago

they're Bloomberg Economists™ which is the equivalent of McDonald's doctors

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

Oh they understand. Take the bus, peasant! All the extra time you waste on public transportation is time you won't be spending organizing with your fellow wage-slaves!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 47 points 7 months ago

Wow this is so helpful. I thought skipping iPhones and avocado toast would cover it, but putting down Fido definitely makes sense.

Here's a couple more ideas:

  • Never leave your house.
  • Actually, get rid of the house, tents offer shelter at a fraction of the cost
  • Let grandma pull herself up by her bootstraps, physical therapy isn't cheap.
  • If you have children, help them with interview roleplay, putting little ones to work can be a great way to increase your household income
  • cut out alcohol, tobacco and caffine, those costs can add up quick!
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 7 months ago

If your child is young enough, you might be able to sell them to African slavers to work in diamond mines. Not only a savings but a profit!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 36 points 7 months ago

Why do all economists seem so out of touch?

[-] Kyrrrr@mander.xyz 45 points 7 months ago

The article isn't for us. It's for the super rich to justify their wealth. They'll read that and think, "yeah, I made my sacrifices, these kids need to make theirs if they want to be as wealthy as me. Now how do I pay my daughter to talk to me again?"

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

Because they worship money. It all makes sense when you assume this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Actual article for those interested https://archive.is/20220320001551/https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-03-13/inflation-stings-most-for-those-earning-under-300-000?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&cmpid%3D=socialflow-twitter-economics&utm_source=twitter&utm_content=economics

Bloomberg is not worth the electrons to used to represent the characters that they print but this is pure rage bait and almost anything taken out of contacts can be horrific.

Here's the quote with context

If you’re one of the many Americans who became a new pet owner during the pandemic, you might want to rethink those costly pet medical needs. It may sound harsh, but researchers actually don’t recommend pet chemotherapy — which can cost up to $10,000 — for ethical reasons.

Emphasis mine.

The screenshot is pure rage bait.

Would you like to know more? https://faunalytics.org/canine-chemotherapy-the-ethics-behind-hard-decisions/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago

Real talk in case someone needs to see this:

I had a good friend who's dog got cancer and he spoke very passionately about regretting the chemo. He said that chemo for people is to kill the cancer chemo for animals is to extend their life, but this wasn't something he knew going into the process.

It was not a good experience for either my friend or his doggo.

Bloomberg economics can go fuck themselves.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I probably wouldn't do chemo for my pet knowing what it does to a human who can communicate how much it sucks. Not because of inflation and the author of the piece really could've left that part out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 22 points 7 months ago

Chemotherapy for a dog? I think where I live it's seen as more merciful to put the dog down rather than have them suffer through chemo.

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

My understanding is the goal of chemo for animals is to keep the drugs at a low enough level that any symptoms they have from them are less impactful than the symptoms they have from the cancer. I understand it's also less effective, for this reason- but it wouldn't be fair to make them sick because they don't understand.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago

I feel like the chemo would only be to prolong their life for the benefit of the owners and not of the animal.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] taanegl@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

How about just selling organs... of former executives and politicians... harvested in a dirty basement... and sold out of the back of a van...

Look, I'm just trying to share my life experiences to try and help, alright?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Another quick tip - you can both make and save a bit of money by selling your kids to be eaten!

Just leave a trail of sweets for them to the local witches' cottage and they'll take them off your hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spiderwort@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

Appalling, yes. But give it a couple generations.

Owning pets, land or house? Eating anything but bugs? Absurd! Who do you think you are, royalty?

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I don't get this eating bugs paranoia - assuming it becomes a meaningful thing, they'll be turned into something tasty. There's also every reason to think it'll be cheaper and more sustainable than meat.

I don't see conspiracusts losing their minds about the mechanically reclaimed offal in their burgers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hannes3120@feddit.de 11 points 7 months ago

Totally normal stuff

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

> Bloomberg's daily "Let them eat cake" post

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I only have one car... and I ~~need to get to work for it.~~ need it to get to work.

So, since Bloomberg is so helpful, how about I steal their car and sell it to beat inflation? Think they're BMW's or Audis?

(edit- apparently not my night.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

Or...the grocery store can stop price gouging their customers. The FTC already said they used the pandemic to inflate prices too much.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
972 points (98.3% liked)

Political Memes

5398 readers
2181 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS