1070
Homer (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 253 points 8 months ago

I mean, this is how far our standard of living has fallen in the US.

Like, back in the 80's and 90's it was pretty normal for a family to subsist on a single income, in a reasonably nice house, with all of their necessities taken care of. It was so normal that even a brainless loser like Homer could do it.

Also because back then, kinda fat = automatic loser

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 58 points 8 months ago

Frank Grimes pointed out the insanity/luck of his living situation and your last part is true today “bumbling oaf” is still an archetype

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 37 points 8 months ago

Ah, good ol' Grimey (as he liked to be called).

[-] bobburger@fedia.io 33 points 8 months ago

To be fair a nuclear operator can typically afford to support a family of 5 even today.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This. The show routinely makes fun of the fact that Homer is completely unqualified for his job and seems to keep it because he amuses Burns. They had a whole episode recently about how Homer got a new job over a nuclear engineering PhD because he Cyrano'd the interview via Fink. Meaning his job title likely commands well over $200k, though it is implied that Burns pays him somewhat less than that.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 27 points 8 months ago

The show quit caring about money because it's not interesting. The early seasons have money as a constant issue. It's just not that interesting to she them constantly needing money, so they just stopped.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 25 points 8 months ago

That said, suburbia was built on borrowed money from the future , and the reason why most cities are broke.

[-] Kbin_space_program@kbin.social 81 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It has nothing to do with suburbia.

It has everything to do with the politics of Thatcher and Reagan. Their policies of annihilating unions, human rights and creating tax cuts for the rich by passing on the taxes to the working and the poor created this dystopian reality we now have.

If we cut out the rich and restore what we used to have for rights and protections, we can try to save ourselves from extinction.

[-] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 35 points 8 months ago

The two are related. Oil money supports both the suburban Ponzi scheme and also Reaganite deregulation.

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

My point is, for a city, every square foot of street has an operational cost, and on top of that infrastructure needs to be rebuilt every x years (I think around 20 ~ 25).
While the upfront cost of said infrastructure tends to come from subventions when building a new development, the city needs to cover the costs for both operations and rebuilding once it's needed.

Why does this matter? Well, detached single-family houses provide lower revenue per square foot of street than middle housing or mid-rises, eventually creating a hole in the city's pockets.

I'm not explaining it very well, but I'll suggest taking a look at this:
https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2023/6/21/whats-the-sweet-spot-for-building-housing-inexpensively
Climate Town - The suburbs are bleeding America Dry

If cities had money, they could build public housing or promote affordable options.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago

Like, back in the 80’s and 90’s it was pretty normal for a family to subsist on a single income, in a reasonably nice house, with all of their necessities taken care of.

I wonder what "pretty normal" is, according to actual numbers

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago

I remember growing up in the 90's, my classmates and I all thought that one of the other kids was a liar because he said he didn't have a yard (he lived in an apartment). It didn't make sense - everyone else in the class of 30+ kids lived in a house with a yard, so he must just be making stuff up. Obviously that's anecdotal evidence, but still. It was weird for a kid not to live in a single-family home back then.

[-] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 8 months ago

You'd have to look at the size of the middle class back then, as that's what the "American Dream" scenario is based on there, but as a kid born in 1990, I can say that when my dad was looking for apartments when he was around college age in the 60s, the rule was not to rent an apartment that cost more than 25% of your salary. By the time I was around that same age in the late 2000s/early 2010s, it was 50% of your salary. Now, it's closer to 120% of your salary for those same apartments.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 204 points 8 months ago

He's not? There's literally an episode about how Homer is so lucky in life that he drives a man insane.

And the man's estranged bastard son!

[-] CorneliusTalmadge@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

He happened to like hookers.

[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 50 points 8 months ago

In fairness, that entire episode was lampshade hanging

[-] state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 8 months ago

What is lampshade hanging?

[-] norbert@kbin.social 42 points 8 months ago

Lampshade Hanging (or, more informally, "Lampshading") is the writers' trick of dealing with any element of the story that seems too dubious to take at face value, whether a very implausible plot development or a particularly blatant use of a trope, by calling attention to it and simply moving on.

https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LampshadeHanging

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 22 points 8 months ago

Calling themselves out on how ridiculous the situation is, basically.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 90 points 8 months ago

Uhhhh... Homer has three kids, surely?

[-] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 8 months ago

Why can't I have no kids and three money??

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

According to the available tax information he has nine kids, one of which is a Vietnam veteran.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

C'mon, Marge, the dog doesn't count as a kid.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 78 points 8 months ago

Wait, 2 kids? Which one died?

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 53 points 8 months ago

Three! We have THREE kids Homer.

Three noisy kids. Fish heads, fish heads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

Marge had a seventh trimester abortion this season.

[-] FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

To be fair, Maggie has been a baby for years. There was probably something wrong

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CaptainHowdy@lemm.ee 73 points 8 months ago

My dudes.... He has three kids.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 35 points 8 months ago

Poor sod wishes he had three moneys instead

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jonwyattphillips@lemmy.ml 64 points 8 months ago

OP lives above a bowling alley and bellow another bowling alley.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 55 points 8 months ago

Because he's a little overweight, and in 1989, that was reason enough to laugh at someone.

Plus, all of those were commonplace thirty years ago.

[-] Cruxifux@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

Homer is like average North American weight now haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lseif@sopuli.xyz 53 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago

I see your Homer Simpson and raise you Al Bundy, who works at a shoe store and raised a family of 4 on that salary

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sirico@feddit.uk 39 points 8 months ago

I live in a single room above a bowling alley and below another bowling alley

[-] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 36 points 8 months ago

Isn't Homer meant to be an illustration of privilege? Like, he's pretty useless, but still gets essentially everything he wants.

[-] Syd@lemm.ee 51 points 8 months ago

Nah, it's supposed to be funny and relatable. Times changed, not the cartoon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 8 months ago

If he wasn't, he is now. They made a musical episode about it called "Goodbye Middle Class" where they illustrate this with him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] the_rogue@sh.itjust.works 33 points 8 months ago

You missed how he is dumb as fuck and how all he have is by luck . As another person commented there is an episode in which a real hard working man gets mad how homer has everything even tho he does'nt deserve it and i agree he almost causes nuclear melt down atleast twice a day, abuses his son, ignores his daughter etc.etc.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 27 points 8 months ago

Frank Grimes: If you lived in any other country in the world, you'd have starved to death long ago.

Bart: He's got you there, Dad.

Grimes: You're a fraud, a total fraud. (To Marge and the kids) Was nice meeting you.

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 29 points 8 months ago

He is not, see the Frank Grimes episode

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 19 points 8 months ago

Or Grimey, as he liked to be called.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LEONHART@slrpnk.net 27 points 8 months ago

WELL, I DON'T NEED SAFETY GLOVES, BECAUSE I'M HOMER SIMP--

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

I'm fifty one years old and just kinda wanna break down what I've seen in my life:

My grandparents generation: Was able to buy housing, get healthcare, receive retirement. Note: They lived through the great depression, and categorically never spent any money that wasn't necessary, even when they had several boatloads of it.

My parents generation: Housing was achievable but not given (I remember a whole lot of single wides, apartments, and duplexes among the adults of my childhood). Healthcare was affordable. Retirement was promised but not delivered.

My generation: Housing was achievable if you moved to the sticks and loved you some Jesus at the local Baptist Church, but not in the cities. We got a taste of healthcare twenty five years ago, but then yeah no. Retirement? Hahahahaha! We got 401(k)s forced in us, and they never materialized into dick. Many flatout vaporized when our marriages fizzled out.

My kid's generation. Seriously, just die in the street. You'll get absolute fuck all nothing, and you'll like it as the older generations blame you for our fuckups.

My great contribution is that I'll be able to leave my house free and clear of mortgage to my spawn when I check out. She can live in it, sell it, rent it, burn it to the ground. Whatever she wants, but damnit, I'm giving her the opportunity to do it, which most of her peers will never have.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Hedonism and Wealth should not be your metric for evaluating people, anon.

Homer sleeps at his job, is a habitual drinker, and is willfully ignorant.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

But he did also win a nuclear power plant design contest.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
1070 points (98.5% liked)

Greentext

4590 readers
720 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS