189
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 123 points 1 month ago

Blocking a large messaging platform because a minority of people are using it for piracy, of all things, seems extremely disproportionate

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 40 points 1 month ago

And it is pointless too as there are countless other messaging apps that can be used and countless others ways that can be created to circumvent. Law makers clearly do not get tech.

[-] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The other messaging apps offering better privacy on top of that, making it harder to control.

[-] ASaltPepper@lemmy.one 20 points 1 month ago

I mean Telegram has been blocked in Russia before and it didn't stop their operations for too long. At best now some engineer at telegram has one more ticket and things will be back to normal.

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

and it didn’t stop their operations for too long

You had to change proxies regularly, so it did. With some ISPs, at least.

I think it wasn't for really blocking it, just to test whether they can block it if they need it, during some big events.

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago

Honestly, Telegram sucks. Use Signal for private communications and Matrix for groups/communities.

[-] guts@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 month ago

Telegram is great for nothing related to privacy.

[-] Shinji_Ikari@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

It's not great if security is your main goal for organizing, but it has a better user experience than most chat apps. Especially if cross platform chatting is important to you.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Schlemmy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

It's the best app when it comes to functionality. It has it all.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Cover_czar@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Matrix is good for personal communications too The us companies made you to use phone numbers for chatting Id's are convenient

[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, sure, you can use Matrix for personal chats. It's perfectly secure, but it's not as easy to use as Signal. For example, if I told my grandma to install Element and send me her Matrix ID, she would be really confused. Signal is very easy to use, and the user experience is basically the same as on mainstream platforms like WhatsApp. I also don't think that the phone number requirement is a US thing, as Telegram also has it. Signal only requires phone numbers to prevent spam, but they recently introduced usernames, so you don't have to give people your phone number in order for them to message you.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago

Does Telegram have anything that torrents and usenet don't?

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 month ago

It indeed empowers common people by distributing full seasons of series all in one place in a somewhat user friendly way without "10 chicks in 10mt" popups.

A bunch of my friends, who don't even know how to install an adblocker, have a very rich catalog of things there.

Also, it is more difficult for a telegram channel to be banned than a website.

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 17 points 1 month ago

It's normie-accessible

[-] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

Probably not, but Telegram is very easy to use.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] guts@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Good luck ban it, Telegram runs everywhere without playstore and with proxy.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 9 points 1 month ago

Sounds like EU will need to unblock it again... But Faschistoid governments do such things from time to time... (idiots)

[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Truly Spain without the S

My buddy in Spain says the block it pretty easier to get around at least.

[-] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

You know Telegram is secure when every government in the world is trying to ban it.

[-] Mikufan@ani.social 33 points 1 month ago

Not actually, the end to end encryption is not active by default for example. Its just that telegram is more of a unmoderated social media than a messaging app.

Signal, Matrix and similar are way safer but don't usually have large piracy groups.

[-] ladfrombrad 5 points 1 month ago

To be honest Telegram doesn't ban private groups "for piracy" and only takes out public groups that receive a DMCA.

I think the above user is pointing out a rather fun fact - if you're in some of the many private groups where shit is shared freely.....those wanting to ban it don't like the fact that they can't see in those private groups.

Like, is there any evidence of private groups being monitored by media corps or their lackeys in gov?

[-] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

This doesn't make it secure for anything else. There are also plenty of private torrent trackers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Just use Signal if you want an easy, relatively privacy friendly and secure messenger.

Telegram hands over data to goverments, is infested with spammers and scammers and its encryption is not end to end for group chat which lets Telegram access those chats.

Edit: Telegram is great for lots of things like big groups, communities, piracy, drugs etc but its just not the place where you should expect secure communication.

[-] turkishdelight@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago

I'm not using Signal as long as Signal Foundation is based in the US. Also Signal is not on FDroid, so I can't use it anyway.

[-] heyfrancis@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

I installed Signal via Obtanium. Just use this URL when searching/adding the app

https://signal.org/android/apk/

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

You can side load.signal though from their website

https://signal.org/download/android/

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Andromxda@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

But Russian/UAE-based Telegram is fine? 😂

Also, it really doesn't matter where Signal is based, as long as it's client code is open source and it uses E2EE by default. Telegram doesn't encrypt chats by default, and even if you enable 'secret chats' it uses a pretty weak encryption protocol.

Btw the official version of Telegram isn't available on F-Droid either, only a fork called Telegram-FOSS. You can get the exact same thing for Signal from a 3rd-party repo: https://www.twinhelix.com/apps/signal-foss/, or use Molly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] punkisundead@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

This might not be relevant because you have other reasons not to use Signal, but you can get android signal directly from their website and via aurora store (on fdroid)

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

Signal releases their own self-updating apk on their site, and this release doesn't use Google services for push notifications. There are legitimate reasons why publishers sometimes avoid f-droid.

Also there's Molly, which is a signal fork that allows database encryption; or Session, which doesn't require a phone number for account registration and is decentralized. Both of these forks have repos that you can add to f-droid.

I do understand the hesitance to use a platform that has its infrastructure in the US, but I will say that international compliance with the US is a problem even if the infrastructure is located elsewhere. Session is a really promising option, since it's decentralized, and I'd love to see more people using it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

The CEO is a Russian, the company is based out of Dubai, and messages aren't encrypted by default. In fact, only private messages can be encrypted, group messages cannot. Telegram is not a trustworthy platform and a champion for user privacy like most people think, Signal is what you're looking for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

Spain? Really? I thought they had a pretty left government?

[-] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is one of the rare things where the Spanish left and right agree, for different reasons.

Simplifying a lot:

  • The left generally supports culture, actors, theatre, writers, Spanish made movies. They see piracy as a threat to the earnings of those people.
  • The right has historically cut any sorts of subsidies to the "culture creators", but they see piracy as a threat to the publishing, TV (...) industries.

They both support SGAE, which translates cleanly to the General Society of Authors and Editors, who protects their interests by charging fees to everyone who dares look at copyrighted work.

  • You own a bar and you play TV, Radio, or Spotify? You have to pay SGAE.
  • You buy a computer, part of the money goes to SGAE.
  • You buy a blank CD, DVD, Hard Drive, you pay SGAE (because they know you will put copyrighted material there, and if you don't, well, fuck you)

It's a fucked up system and I don't know if things have changed in the past few years as I don't live in Spain anymore. But it honestly feels like a prosecution of the population who is so evil and trying to destroy Spanish Culture.

[-] Freeman@feddit.de 5 points 1 month ago

Tbh switzerland has a similar system to the SGAE, where there is a "hidden tax" on all devices that you can load with data. And in turn the downloading of media (with the exclusion of computerprograms and games) is legal. Only the upload of copyrighted material is forbidden.

Not a bad system imo, the tax is so small that you dont really notice it so its a pretty consumer-friendly and piracy-friendly solution. Altho I assume the swiss government gets away with it because it would be too expensive to lobby/legal for a copyrightsholder-favoured system compared with the small amount of people (let alone pirate) who live here.

[-] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

That's different, we also have a "canon digital" which means you pay an extra tax on all copying and storing devices. But that has nothing to do with the SGAE, which is a corrupt organization that funnels money to their artist list, instead of giving it to the actual artists that are being played.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TyrantTW@kbin.social 9 points 1 month ago

They do, but this is coming from a right-dominated tribunal known to be extremely conservative and reactionary in nature.

[-] Summzashi@lemmy.one 6 points 1 month ago

You dont have to boil down everything to "left vs right" especially not in Europe. Because if you do, blocking a chat app is by definition a leftist thing to do because of the government interference.

Please keep the American team vs team culture away from Europe.

[-] Ignacio@kbin.social 4 points 1 month ago

What is the relationship between the government ideology and the court system? Both are independent from each other.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
189 points (98.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

51853 readers
1289 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

5. Don't post questions already answered. Read the wiki



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS