1603

John Barnett had worked for Boeing for 32 years, until his retirement in 2017.

In the days before his death, he had been giving evidence in a whistleblower lawsuit against the company.

Boeing said it was saddened to hear of Mr Barnett's passing. The Charleston County coroner confirmed his death to the BBC on Monday.

It said the 62-year-old had died from a "self-inflicted" wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 4grams@awful.systems 484 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I am not a conspiracy theorist. Reality is trying it’s damnedest to make me one.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 219 points 9 months ago

Eh. There will always be real conspiracies and then...lizard people conspiracies.

This shit right here? yeah.....they killed him. 100%. No doubt in my fucking mind.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 172 points 9 months ago

I mean, he was old...people die—

It said the 62-year-old had died from a "self-inflicted" wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

oh shit they totally fucking killed him

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 158 points 9 months ago

It's possible it was stress from the litigation. In fact, if you don't specify whose stress, I'd almost guarantee it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 58 points 9 months ago

There are circumstances where conspiracy the likeliest explanation.

This is one of those.

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] IzzyScissor@kbin.social 345 points 9 months ago

He was staying at a hotel out-of-state while giving evidence against Boeing.
He was found dead in his car in the hotel parking lot from a 'self-inflicted wound'.

There's really no other way to look at it logically than he was murdered by Boeing. Nothing else adds up.

[-] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 190 points 9 months ago

He wasn't even done giving the deposition that he literally volunteered to give...

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago

I mean, I think the logical thing to do is wait until the evidence comes out and we know for sure. It's entirely possible he was under a lot of stress from all this and did kill himself. Now, I don't deny that it's a HUGE. FUCKING. CONICIDENCE. but those do happen from time to time. Its also a hell of a story, good-guy whistleblower murdered by greedy multinational aerospace company and defense contractor...during an election year...if you wrote the script nobody would buy it.

Let's be suspicious, but not jump to conclusions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 74 points 9 months ago

Look, I'm not gonna say Boeing did it. Though if they did, I'd bet money they drove.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 45 points 9 months ago

An investor could’ve threatened his family? (So not directly Boeing)

If he got a bunch of hate online, or had crippling anxiety about the testimony he still had to give? I mean you could even speculate he thought he would be killed someday, so he took it into his own hands.

(Please note the above is all BS!)

I would argue the jury is still out and that we may never know.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

Direct involvement might be a question still. But general involvement is absolute. If Boeing wasn't so shitty he almost assuredly would still be alive.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 218 points 9 months ago

Guess the executives didn't want to wait for him to take one of their planes and die naturally by getting sucked out at 35,000 feet when a door falls off.

[-] Kitten_Mittens@lemmy.world 206 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

“Local officials confirmed Mr. Barnett’s suicide. When asked how Mr. Barnett managed to fire the sniper shot through his bedroom window, the officer first on the scene only replied, “Trust me bro.”, while stuffing a large stack of 100 dollars bills back down the front of his pants.”

[-] BeardedSingleMalt@kbin.social 89 points 9 months ago

[2 week later] Former lead detective found dead in in what investigators have ruled a suicide. He apparently hung himself after a fit of rage where his house appeared to have kicked in his own front door, tore the hard drive out of his security camera hub, punched himself in the face a number of times, then tied the rope to a bannister and strung himself up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] burgers@toast.ooo 169 points 9 months ago

i can't find it online, but im reasonably certain i heard an interview with this guy on Canadian public radio several years ago that really shook me. he talked basically about how he wouldn't fly on a Boeing plane, knowing what he knows and having seen what he'd seen, stuff like quality rejected parts getting taken back into inventory to meet quotas. the takeaway for me was that the quality control system that had previously worked so well was an invention of equal or possibly higher importance to any kind of aerodynamic innovation present on those planes. i work in an analogous role (in a different industry) and i really do take it more seriously after having heard the interview. nobody likes the work of quality assurance and you'll never see someone doing a non-conformance report on TV but it's a necessary condition for planes to stay in the sky. RIP to a real one and if he got murdered then i hope the industry burns

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Neat, I'm jumping on a Boeing 737-700 in about 8 hours. Nice knowin ya while it lasted.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 47 points 9 months ago

John Oliver's Boeing broadcast last week included a video of a guy walking around a Boeing production floor asking all the people if any of them would be willing to fly in a Boeing. Of everyone he asked a single guy said yes and then followed it up with "but I kind of have a death wish."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 126 points 9 months ago

They should really make some sort of incentive to keep these people alive. Like if a whistle blower dies before the verdict of the trial/hearing make it an automatic assumption and multiply the punishment by 3 times (Treble!). Then you would have companies doing everything to not have whistle blowers die, not what we have today.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 126 points 9 months ago

Your competitors take out contract hits against your whistleblower and you need to have bodyguards to protect them.

And then your head of security and the whistleblower fall in love until at the end of the movie the competitor assassin gets into the court waiting room and the head of security throws themselves into the ninja star's way and dies in the whistleblower's arms as the ultimate sacrifice is made for love and corporate profits.

I tear up just thinking about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] aidan@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

They do have an disincentive, its called decades in jail if its discovered you kill him.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 9 months ago

The day before his testimony. He was 100% assassinated. Too bad Boeing is such a major company. This would have FBI agents crawling all over it if it wasn't a company that can afford to buy every politician in DC.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 109 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'm not going to say that Boeing had this guy directly killed, but I can certainly see them and their legal team explicitly trying to make his life as hellish as possible until he felt that he only had one way out. Legal threats if you stop proceeding with your case, legals threats if you don't, they want a terrible warning for any other whistleblowers.

[-] vjxtdibobyd@lemmy.world 52 points 9 months ago

Isn't that exactly what happened to Aaron Schwartz? Not a whistleblower, but similar tactics

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wooster@startrek.website 106 points 9 months ago

Is this a Russian style self inflicted wound…?

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 123 points 9 months ago

My brother in Freedom Jesus, faking a murder to look like suicide is as American as apple pie!

Hell the most notorious pedophile in history, who definitely had video of the world’s richest men committing statutory rape and assault, killed himself in one of the most secure locations anyone could imagine, surrounded by guards and video cameras! And nobody saw a thing! HA! And we’re all like “well i guess that sordid chapter is over” hahahaha. Oh man. It literally works every. single. time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 103 points 9 months ago

How about customers just flat out refuse to fly on Boeing planes?

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 71 points 9 months ago

The fact that several airlines let you filter out plane models indicates people are indeed doing that. Airbus: no fuss; no muss.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 101 points 9 months ago

Why don't news organizations address the elephant in the room? They can say there is no evidence of foul play but the circumstances warrant further investigation as his death is quite convenient for Bowing. I don't see how that could be libelous.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Cosmicomical@lemmy.world 99 points 9 months ago

So, the guy was expected to appear in court for thw second round of questioning and when he didn't show up was found dead in his truck in the underground car park of the hotel. Doesn't sound like someone that wanted to end it. Maybe I'm wrong but I wouldn't book a room to go to court and then on a whim decide to end it.

They should investigate the coroner asap.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 99 points 9 months ago

I'll never fly in a Boeing again after hearing this. Unless the ceo gets arrested 🤔

Kayak lets you search via plane model fyi

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 87 points 9 months ago

This is "falling out of a window or down an elevator shaft in Russia"-level blatant.

This appears very loud and clear to any other potential whistle-blowers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] veniasilente@lemm.ee 72 points 9 months ago

It said the 62-year-old had died from a “self-inflicted” wound on 9 March and police were investigating.

Ah yes the classic suicide by shot to the back.

Nothing to see here, citizen. Move along, and consoom Boeing.

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 71 points 9 months ago

Weird, but I read this article and before it said specifically that he died from a gunshot wound. Looks like it's been updated (or redacted) to leave that bit out. Originally it said he died from a self inflicted gunshot wound to the head.

So Boeing executives murdered a whistleblower. huh.

Being in Quality Control myself, I've always felt pressure from higher ups around some of our bigger findings. Cool to know if I ever find something too big they'll just straight up murder me.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Audacious@sh.itjust.works 57 points 9 months ago

If it's Boeing, I'm NOT going.

[-] flango@lemmy.eco.br 56 points 9 months ago

Last week, he gave a formal deposition in which he was questioned by Boeing's lawyers, before being cross-examined by his own counsel.

He had been due to undergo further questioning on Saturday. When he did not appear, enquiries were made at his hotel.

He was subsequently found dead in his truck in the hotel car park.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
1603 points (99.2% liked)

News

23627 readers
2490 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS