160
submitted 9 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A growing number of Republican National Committee members believe its campaign arm should help pay mounting legal bills for former President Donald Trump, a move that could strain the party’s ability to financially support other candidates in the 2024 election.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 65 points 9 months ago

Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.

-Lyndon Johnson

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That full quote was critical of Republican voters, but you could also see the yearning he had for democratic voters to be that basic and easy to trick.

And the party has been trying to make Dem voters like Republican voters ever since

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 54 points 9 months ago

Remember when people said they liked Trump because being rich made him impossible to buy?

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 7 points 9 months ago

That's what he said. I suppose some number of idiots must have parroted him.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 51 points 9 months ago

I'm sure that a man who could bankrupt a casino can bankrupt the entire GOP.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

Trump: Hold my ~~beer~~ Adderall.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 38 points 9 months ago

I'm actually torn on this. If they don't pay for Trumps legal woes, he has to pay them out of his own coffers, which will seriously hit his pride and self image, which in turn will make him suffer. On the other hand, draining the RNCs chests will impede their ability to support REP candidates everywhere.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 20 points 9 months ago

The RNC shouldn't be allowed to cover his expenses. We can't stop random billionaires from bailing him out but he should need to grovel like a bitch to make it happen... and be required to pay tax on that bailout.

[-] lastjunkieonearth 7 points 9 months ago

How many 'Republican National Committee members' are there and are they, like, filthy rich? (not from US). Kicking in a few million each could be a small price to be in favour with your future dictator

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Yep. I’m more and more ok with the GOP just going broke and fizzling out. Some other party will pop up but it won’t be the same.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

My thought is, If Trump pays himself he will simply finance it and when his whole house of cards falls someone else will be on the hook with his biggest bankruptcy in history - which is inevitable.

On the other hand if it comes from campaign funds then the money will actually get drained from people who need it right now, so for me it's a clear choice, let the campaign pay!

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

Let them, there will be no money for down ballot candidates and we can get a blue Congress.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

Lol...

The good thing about the elderly running both parties is they don't learn from each other's mistakes.

2016 Hillary had a "donation sharing" program where lower ballot candidates were told everyone would get a portion.

Something like 90% went to Hillary, she wasted it, lost the presidency and caused Dems to lose a lot of other seats.

trump literally watched that happen and is now doing the same thing.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 26 points 9 months ago

This whole thing is such an insanely high risk/high reward dynamic for both parties. I really hope this election ends up shattering the GOP as a viable political party… but that might not happen. Also, even if it does, it’s anyone’s guess what the successor party will turn into.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 15 points 9 months ago

Don't interrupt your enemy in the middle of making a mistake.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

As long as the IRS hits Trump with the income tax on he 500+ million income this is for him.

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
160 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2385 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS