527
submitted 5 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Over 7,000 students in Georgia with unpaid lunch balances are getting a helping hand following a $1 million initiative from the Arby's Foundation, the nonprofit announced Thursday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 188 points 5 months ago
[-] nulluser@programming.dev 45 points 5 months ago

Came in here just to find this comment, knowing it would be here, and upvote. Can't help but think the few down votes are just people that don't understand the reference. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/orphan-crushing-machine

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Thank you for this context - I needed it. I sometimes wonder if I should upvote, downvote, or ignore Orphan-Crushing Machine articles.

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 36 points 5 months ago

I had to look at the community to make sure it wasn't OrphanCrushingMachine

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 14 points 5 months ago

Beat me to it by 19 minutes

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 138 points 5 months ago

Georgia apparently would rather put 10 year olds into debt than feed children. It's the best they can do as Christians.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

It is biblical. Charity to people like Paul was freely given out of love vs welfare-taxation system we have now.

Of course a good person who was a Christian could reason out

"Paul was in Rome so he must have seen the free donations of food given by the emperor to the city's poor but didn't comment on it. Which meant that when he talks about charity he is talking about a supplement, yes a supplement not a first response, to actual effective large scale operations. I should be happy with both. A good government that works hard that I add too. Not a bad government I helped create and stick a bandaid on by throwing a twenty in the collection plate".

A pity this doesn't seem to occur to them. Despite the theological wiggle room.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 104 points 5 months ago

Sad that this is even a thing. The richest nation on earth should be able to give its future 2 square meals a day.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 30 points 5 months ago

But that would set them up with unreasonable expectations for adulthood! Gotta prepare them for their future of struggling to get by.

[-] assembly@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

School lunch debt is the so incredibly dystopian that I hope 20-30 years from now people will have to use an internet search to find out what it meant to people in this decade. Like it’s so unabashedly wrong as a thing, I hope we look at like when Bayer made heroin and bloodletting was in practice.

[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 101 points 5 months ago

The orphan crushing machine shall stop...for now

[-] jwt@programming.dev 10 points 5 months ago

One of the orphans jammed the machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Betch@lemmy.world 76 points 5 months ago

Jesus Christ. Students now have debts before they even leave high school? Cool.

[-] lain@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 5 months ago

in capitalism, by the time you were put into this world, you already have a fuck ton of debt

[-] Betch@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Unfortunately true.

[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago

Pretty soon it will be the norm that when you graduate high school you take your first bankruptcy and clean your slate before your life really starts to matter. Hell it's only 7 years, you got 4 years of college so only 3 more till you can start living again! Well I guess after you somehow pay off those new college loans as well.

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago

Just like in Christianity we are all born with sin, in America we are all born with debt.

[-] pacmondo@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago

Some before they leave elementary

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 74 points 5 months ago

Yet another dystopic horror disguised as a feel-good story.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Does this qualify as aboringdystopia content?

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 20 points 5 months ago
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago
[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 73 points 5 months ago

Something something boring dystopia

[-] AThing4String@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 months ago

Peak orphan crushing machine

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

Lunch debt …

[-] vox@sopuli.xyz 47 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

what the fuck is a lunch debt???

[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

States that opted out of federal funding for school lunches (because fuck them poor kids) let hungry children run up a tab on cafeteria lunches. Then they punish and publicly shame them for not paying. Why? FREEDOM. 🇺🇸 🇺🇸 🇺🇸

https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/what-is-lunch-shaming/

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Doorbook@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago

Food is a human right..

[-] massacre@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

"Lunch Debt" ... jesus christ

[-] flathead@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago

"Then he took the seven loaves and the fish, and when he had given thanks, he broke them and gave them to the disciples, and they in turn gave to the people. They all ate and were satisfied. Afterward, they were all given invoices and in his majestic mercy he allowed them all an extra 30 days to pay."

Matthew 15:32

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago
[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

i thought American kids got free school lunches?

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 65 points 5 months ago

There is a federal lunch subsidy program, and many states also have their own lunch programs. The program even extends through the summer.

Several caveats.

First, not every state participates. This is free money that states could use to feed hungry kids, and some states are just like "nah, fuck them kids."

Second, parents generally have to apply for the program. You fill out some forms, and the kids get subsidized lunches. That's a problem, because not every parent knows the programs exist, not every parent speaks English or Spanish or another language the school might be thoughtful enough to have the forms translated into. At my kids' elementary school, during Covid, we learned that there are 32 different first languages spoken in the homes of students. Sharing information is a problem.

Third, the subsidized lunch is often a lesser meal than what the paying kids get. It might be a cheese and white bread sandwich, an apple sauce, and some milk. Now, sure, if you're hungry, food is better than no food. But kids know what the brown bag lunch means. It's embarrassing, creates division across income levels, and can encourage some hungry kids to choose not to accept the food rather than face ridicule.

But you know what's amazing? During Covid, school meal providers were facing financial ruin. They had contracts to provide food for a bunch of kids that weren't in the schools. Sysco and Aramark and many others were staring at a total loss for all of their school lunch programs, and the government bailed them out. The state and federal governments found a way to pay for all the school lunches and give them away for free to all students in every state. There wasn't even a debate, and no politicians opposed it.

The money was just there, no strings or hoops or pork barrel haggling. Major industry is facing crisis, and suddenly we can afford to feed all the kids, no exceptions, no forms or paperwork. Local food banks were overflowing with frozen meals and fresh produce and all the tiny cartons of milk you can imagine.

Now, you could say that Covid was an emergency, that the collapse of the school lunch industry would have horrible economic ramifications, and that would be true.

But it wasn't even expensive, and that was for everybody. There's no reason we could not afford to provide free lunches to any child in America who asks for it, and I mean a real lunch. The same thing the kid who paid is getting. School cafeterias throw away more food than the value of food given away as part of free lunch programs AND unpaid lunch debts combined. Feeding every child would be a rounding error, and nobody would be stigmatized or penalized because their parents couldn't afford their lunch.

Hungry kids don't learn. Feed them all.

[-] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 32 points 5 months ago

First, not every state participates. This is free money that states could use to feed hungry kids, and some states are just like "nah, fuck them kids."

Alabama, Alaska, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont and Wyoming.

The program requires states to pay half of the administrative costs - not the benefit itself, just the costs associated with distributing the benefit.

The federal free lunch program would have brought $18,000,000 to the state, at a total cost of $300,000 to the state. The governor refused the program, saying "I don't believe in welfare."

Nebraska receives $1,100,000,000 per year in agricultural subsidies. He doesn't have a problem taking federal dollars to feed pigs, but kids are on their own.

[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 11 points 5 months ago

He doesn't have a problem taking federal dollars to feed pigs,

Hey, just because they are Nebraska politicians, doesn't mean they deserve to starve. :P

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Whoa now buddy. Can't have that socialism in muh murica. How else will these poor for profit institutions keep posting record profits?

*edit In some places maybe... but that and may other services have been gutted. sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fixbeat@lemmy.ml 27 points 5 months ago

Just think how many people could be fed with that waste of space Elon's billions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] oakey66@lemmy.world 23 points 5 months ago

I hate seeing these articles as if those people should be thankful for the kindness of some random person instead of being angry that school lunch debt is something that actually exists.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 10 points 5 months ago

I fucking hate massive corporations laundering their reputations like this. If they cared, they'd lobby for higher taxes on the rich to pay for free school meals and a bazillion other things that govt should provide but doesn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

children having lunch debt isnt a thing that should exist in the supposedly richest country in the world.

and it shouldnt be reliant upon kind and generous donations for them to be fed.

for fucks sake, I'm tired of these stories made to look as feel good stories when they are nothing but documentation of the decline of our civilization.

"Oh, yes, children. You can't eat today because you are poor, lest some generous noble allows it with a meager donation of a fraction of their wealth"

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Malnutrition leads to all kinds of cognitive problems or developmental issues, which just increases the burden on society later from medical or social issues developed by such people. Lunch debt is a shitty, gross concept and I hate living in a world where it exists.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 13 points 5 months ago

What a world we live in, where charities have to step in to stop children going into debt over school lunches...

You'd think that one of the wealthiest governments in the world would have a better solution to this problem by now than relying on charity

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

1 million initiative from the Arby’s Foundation

This with their slogan "we've got the meats" and there is a good cannibalism joke somewhere in there.

Yes, charity is great. Fixing society level problems with society level solutions is better. We need to get salaries higher and limit the cost of living increases. For food the best way is to stop paying farmers to under produce and instead work on getting the price to move food down. Let the price for food rush to the bottom and at the same time increase the salaries of everyone on the bottom.

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 8 points 5 months ago

Yeah, I was thinking for what arby’s pays lobbyists to avoid taxes and wage increases, they could lobby once more for higher wages, higher taxes on wealthy and corporations, lower retail cost, and more government dollars for free, comprehensive, quality food, education and healthcare and just fix the problem. The C employees and board wouldn’t even have to do without another yacht to do it, just budget better.

[-] Mereo@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It's a clash of two worldviews. The purest form of capitalism believes that the individual is selfish and thinks only of himself. Therefore, it's up to the individual to succeed no matter what, relying only on himself.

On the other hand, we have the Scandinavian system, where the individual is not inherently selfish, but selfless, it's all about reciprocity, helping each other.

To me, the purest form of capitalism is pure evil. It sees the world as half empty instead of half full.

Lunch debt should not be a thing.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
527 points (96.8% liked)

News

21678 readers
3282 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS