this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2026
668 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

12208 readers
2213 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aren't these both projects that had very strong long term benefits on shipping and exporting?

[–] Eheran@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago
[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh good, so are you saying in about 7 years, this data center bullshit will end?

[–] Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Depends on whether the AI boom is like the canal boom (fizzled), or the railroad boom (still going, arguably underinvested).

[–] Morlark@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago

Except the railway boom isn't still going... it unarguably, unambiguously did fizzle, just like the canal boom before it, and for exactly the same reason too: it was replaced by a superior technology. In the case of canals, that was railways. In the case of the railways, that was motorised road-going vehicles.

[–] CalypsoGirl@lemmy.today 1 points 21 hours ago

I'm pretty sure the above rhetoric was about the canal and data centers. Railroad was a side topic. So I choose to interpret it as within 7 years, data centers are gonna be repurposed into big box stores or filled with cobwebs & left to crumble to dust.

[–] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Canals at least it was pretty easy to see a valuable use case.

Get commerce from New York to the Great Lakes without have to sail up past Maine and then still get past Niagara Falls somehow? That's amazing!

It just got outpaced by technology

And the Panama and Suez Canals are STILL incredibly important to global shipping, greatly shortening trade routes where rail or road simply isn't an alternative

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Western Canada might not exist if it hadn't been for canals.

After the war of 1812, Canada / Britain (there wasn't really a separate Canada at that point) decided there needed to be a way to get military supplies and equipment to Fort York (Toronto) and west of there without using the St. Lawrence river. The river had a number of issues, but the biggest one was that the US controlled the southern shore. So, as a result, it built a canal from Ottawa to Kingston. Montreal to Ottawa was possible with existing rivers, and it was safe to get to Montreal from England without going too close to US territory.

So, the Rideau Canal was built. It connected Bytown (now Ottawa) to Kingston. For about 30 years it was the main way of moving people and supplies to the upper shore of Lake Ontario. After that it was replaced by railroads. But, without all the people who had moved west thanks to the canal and now could buy and sell things, there might not have been the justification to build those railroads.

So, yeah, it got outpaced by technology. But, it was a good idea, and was very useful for a few decades.

Also, many of those canals are now tourist attractions and pleasant natural spaces for residents. Virtually everywhere I've travelled where there is a canal, it is now used by people for pleasure boating, or houseboats. Almost always there's also a nice walking path or bike path next to the canal. Rivers are lovely, but rivers tend to have sloped banks which means there isn't a natural path that's right next to the water. With canals, there's often a man-made edge to the waterway, so you can walk / bike right next to it.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 88 points 3 days ago (7 children)

I often think about that canal future that never happened. How sick would it be to get a boat to work everyday

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

As someone who used to ride a boat to work every day, it fuckin ruled and I miss it

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I prefer rail in its various forms. Way faster and cheaper. Canals are absolutely amazing at one crucial thing: moving mind boggling amounts of bulky low value goods for a fraction the cost of rail. The mississippi river system was no joke an american superpower (and still is) for a looong time. You can move grain for thousands of kms for the same price it would cost to ship it 150 via rail.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I do love rail, I'm just sad that we cleared most of our natural waterways for them to be laid down, and often stare wistfully when walking over a rail bridge

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 59 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It isn't. Riding the ferry is a pain in the ass. Boats are slow (or it is too much of a nuisance). High traffic makes it even slower.

Source: live in a city with shitloads of canals and ferries.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 37 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But it's boat traffic. You can literally stare at the bobbing water until the waterways clear

[–] SmokedBillionaire@sh.itjust.works 49 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Some people just never learned to embrace the dilly-dally lifestyle.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

dilly-dally

ahh. one of my favorite pastimes.

[–] Quokka@quokk.au 13 points 2 days ago

Sadly we are forced to lock-in.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Until, some time within the first two weeks, the novelty wears off, and commuting on a boat becomes subjectively indistinguishable from commuting on a particularly slow bus.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Having commuted by ferry I have to say it's still more comfortable than commuting by bus and it's about equally fast/slow here and you can take a bicycle on the ferry during rush hour.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

Let me introduce you to sea sickness and UV reflection making sunburn easier to get on the water

[–] BevsDad@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 days ago

Montréal fixed slow ferries a while back. You're definitely beating traffic on one of these and they essentially aren't bothering anyone zooming across an already turbulent river commercial Harbour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 43 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I was once in the running for a job at a place that was on the banks of a lake and included a boat landing. Learned that there was a house available within my price range right across on the same lake. So I started having real conversations with my wife about us getting like a jet ski for me to commute across the lake to work.

Didn't get the job. Was bummed.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I seem to recall reading about Swiss workers swimming home in the river after work, the current carried them the right way and it seemed brilliant

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, they do that in Berne.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"I'm going to take the lazy river home." That would be so sweet.

For the first 3 or 4 days. About then you're gonna start getting tired of drying off before sitting on the couch when you get home. Then the weather will get too hot or too cold or too mosquito-y.

There's a reason why all modern water parks are surrounded by concrete. Disney World had a water park out in the woods that included a natural lagoon. It's been shut down for decades after a few guests died of brain eating amoeba.

[–] BevsDad@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I think the main advantage would have been getting non urgent freight off motorways as bulk efficiency is the big perk you get with boats.

If you want to boat into work every day Toronto has that option available all year from the islands. Another perk is living in a car free & wooded neighborhood 5-15 minutes away from downtown/harbourfront. Lots of people also live on boats on the Toronto islands, drive their dinghy into town during the summer and then dock at one of the harbourfront marinas in the winter. (Just watch out for the crazy water taxi drivers!)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'm a little jealous of people in England who live on narrowboats on their canals.

And also jealous of the multi-use trail network on what used to be the tow paths, for that matter.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Liveaboard canal boats are also a thing in the Netherlands and honestly it seems pretty great!

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (11 children)

There's no way that the long term billing for AI is tokens. It's not budgetable, it's arbitrary, and eventually people will figure out ways to either game it or evade it.

It's much more likely that they get crammed full of ads and become useless than it is that they become profitable charging via token IMO.

[–] korazail@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 day ago

Just had a funny thought:

User: Please write a boilerplate function that does

LLM:

//XYZ Function: This function does the thing...
//Subscribe to Incogni to prevent your valuable personal data from ending up in the hands of Data Brokers
function XYZ () {
...
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Eh, it's close enough?

If they really wanted to, they could charge for "GPU time" directly. Usage gets a bit complicated with batching and context caching, but its definitely a metric that could be precisely derived.


Don't get me wrong though. That whole business model is doomed.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Whats funny is enshittifying is a suicide button when you can run deepseek or a different open weight model on your own machine. That i own. In my house. Without ads or censorship

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And thus they will try to make computers so expensive that no one can afford them.

[–] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Free Version: Full of Ads

Premium Version: First adertised as Ad Free, then within a few years Full of Ads

Extreme Version: Ad Free for now, but features segregated into additional subscriptions.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Ad Free = we will not charge you for the ads

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So is the move by the car industry to get rid of mass transit in cities long ago a parallel to AI being swept in to replace people as some better solution only to find out later than it's not so great but now getting people back is difficult?

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

The thing about the transit conspiracy is that at that time many people wanted rid of street cars and wanted more space for more cars. It's not like Ford came to town in roaming gangs, ripping up street car tracks. They fed a desire among the public for a modern car-brained society and the public were happy to help.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A few counties like the UK and Netherlands got in on the canal game early. Nowadays, the remaining canal networks there are mostly used for leisure (there are a lot of houseboats in Amsterdam, London, the English Midlands and such), though occasionally they hold their own for specific freight (the spoil from tunnelling for high-speed rail lines in England was often moved by barge rather than convoys of lorries).

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I live in the Netherlands, they still transport lots of cargo via canals. It’s one of the cheapest ways to transport heavy freight like cement. The canals connect to rivers so the barges can travel up the Rhine or Meuse to Germany . Canals aren’t just the waterways inside the cities.

Also a €7BN mega canal is currently under construction in Europe https://youtu.be/VdWQQ1OCUPo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 days ago

Canals are still used to transport freight in Europe. For example there is a canal in southern Germany that connects the Main to the Danube, allowing ships to travel from the North Sea to the Black Sea through rivers and that canal. Germany generally has lots of navigable waterways including canals.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I live in Jersey (New), and we have the Delaware and Raritan Canal, named after the rivers it connects. Was actually used for a bit, and the idea of using it is fascinating. But now it's a 44-mile path and waterway through history, it's very nice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Shoutout to the Clinton Kalamazoo Canal

Likely the most ambitious and worst infrastructure project in state history.

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's so narrow and shallow.

load more comments
view more: next ›