this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2026
416 points (98.1% liked)

politics

31206 readers
2500 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yet when Michelle Obama merely suggested that Americans eat better and exercise, the pedo GOP blew a gasket.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 122 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Damn liberals always telling you what to do.

Conservatives just make it prohibitively expensive to do what you want to do.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

Just wait until they start policing what those on food stamps are putting in their grocery carts again. I swear that was almost an entire genre of "reporting" for them for a while there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

If food is too expensive, don't eat.

-Republicans

Famine makes ecconomic sense

-Also Republicans

Why aren't the plebians having kids? We need more wage slaves! Maybe outlawing abortion is the solution.

-Republicans, again

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I was in an argument just yesterday on the "not having enough kids" subject where people were insisting that younger generations are choosing to live in "expensive places" and that they should move to "cheaper places" so they can start families. As if the idea of abandoning their lives, careers and friends to go live out in the boonies in order to provide a bare-minimum QoL for their family is going to change any dual-income-no-kids couples' minds.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are no cheap places to move. In the USA, anyway. Anywhere that has “affordable” homes has no jobs, so they’re not actually affordable. And employers are getting harder about remote work. It’s very frustrating because I would happily move to a “less expensive area” but I can’t afford it 😂

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"These goddamn city slickers are moving out here and making everything expensive "

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Thanks, Trump! The animals thank you, too!

-- A vegan

Imagine humans revolting because they’re pissed they don’t have the luxury of supporting ongoing genocide of living beings in the name of immediate gratification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Wait, which message did conservative radio give my brainwashed family members to parrot?

"Eggs are too expensive, its the President's faukt." "Steak is too expensive, eat something else."

I need to know what to expect at Thanksgiving.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good message, wrong reasoning.

Ecologists have been telling people [from rich countries] to minimize beef consumption or drop it altogether for years, but not because of its price tag.

[–] sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

not because of its price tag

I get what you mean, and agree, but want to point out that at least in a sense, it is because of the price tag: the cost to the environment and to others, in the form of water use, land use, carbon and methane emissions, etc. Internalizing those external costs would make beef cost more money at the point of sale.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 75 points 4 days ago (2 children)

This administration is going to accidentally encourage a ton of earth friendly behavior. Won’t offset the evil being done, but it’s kind of funny.

[–] epicurean_toast@lemmus.org 3 points 3 days ago

If fossil fuel prices keep skyrocketing, renewable forma of energy are going to suddenly be a lot more economical

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Capitalism will make vegans of us yet.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mthomson@forum.macaque.social 64 points 4 days ago (7 children)

Bread and water for you. And you'll like it!

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

Cattle country hates this one trick!

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I actually agree. Eat less beef and more vegetarian meals. I ate beef today but I also had vegetarian meals 4 days in the last week

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not hard to have a vegetarian day. Think about it: on any given day maybe you have oatmeal or cereal for breakfast, then a PB&J for lunch, then all you have to do is have a CBR burrito for dinner, and BAM, you've had vegetarian day.

I'm also not 100% vegetarian, but I try to be more often than not. Because of various compelling reasons.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is a lot easier to commit to being a sometimes vegetarian than to give up all meat cold turkey. Eating less meat is better for health and for the environment

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Edit: I do want to also acknowledge though that if someone is reducing their meat consumption, that is great too. Any effort helps.

This isn't necessarily true. I've seen interviews with plant-based health coaches who've talked about adherence being better when people do jump all in with a plant-based lifestyle. That's what worked for me too, partly motivated by what I saw in documentaries about factory farms and slaughterhouses, and partly motivated by seeing my own family members die from preventable diseases way younger than they could have lived. Our choices have consequences, so there is urgency.

I went all in for as long as I could, messed up, then immediately tried again and pushed for even longer. Eventually something clicked in my mind and I knew, "I literally don't even need or want this."

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Considering that beef is a potential carcinogen, it's actually good advice. Plus, cattle are a massive producer of methane, which is far worse for global warming than CO~2~

Not to mention screw worms.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 44 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Is Trump about to give the same inadvertent boost to plant-based diets and the environment as he did for renewables?

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago (3 children)

He's so far right that he's popping out on the left like in Kid Icarus. Did you hear about those $5k socialism checks? EVs are getting adopted en masse. Now reducing beef in diets? What's next, common sense gun control? Fully legalized cannabis? Trust busting?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah bitch, we about to switch from beef to Eat the Rich.

[–] OldMan@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

No more beef

Make the switch

Eat the rich

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Have you considered eating bugs yet MAGA?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

LOL, she was soooo close for a moment, I guess. She's still adhering to protein mythologies, it seems. It's 2026. Do people still not know?

But I find it funny that the cons clutched their pearls so hard over Michelle suggesting kids get more exercise and eat vegetables. And now it's a con that is depriving them of beef and telling them to make do.

I thought the liberals were going to make conservative eat bugs and live in a shoebox and own nothing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

“But if it is too expensive — unlike fuel, Benny — you can eat chicken, pork, salmon, eggs."

"Let them eat salmon." LOL.

So there are alternative proteins. That's a free market situation. But there is no alternative to the petro-state. Doing less driving is communism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LocalAreaMan@lemmy.world 32 points 4 days ago

Oil and beef are expensive. 😞

Oil and beef are expensive. 😀

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And they said the democrats wanted to take away hamburgers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 24 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Got that Marie Antoinette energy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It is kinda nice that Impossible Steak Bites now costs less per unit of mass than beef does. Going vegetarian starting to make more sense every day...

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] GarbadgeGoober@feddit.org 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So maybe Trump is actually caring about climate change.

Not only has he lowered the CO2 emissions, through the closure of the straight of Hormuz. Gives electric cars a big boost and now he turns people away from meat to a plant based diet.

Wonder what is next on his agenda to save the planet. Keep on going.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

lol

GOP: "we support farmers!!!!"

also GOP: "oh, beef too much? buy something else"

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Try our Argentinian mystery meat! 30% off!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i am not against changing our diet per say. i can envision a future where we eat more bugs/algae proxies. when playing cyber punk i saw an ad for pizza with “REAL peperoni crickets” or something, and wile i know it’s out there to shock the player, the more i think about it the more i embrace it.

in this case i declare broken clock protocols, and know that this is a symptom to larger rot in society, but our current way of life was never sustainable, nor particularly healthy.

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Meanwhile legumes: am I a joke to you?

Miraculous nitrogen fixing nutritional powerhouses with more culinary flexibility than virtually everything else out there, and y'all are so averse to putting some plants in your mouth that you'd start talking about resorting to eating bugs.

To be fair I do regularly take algae oil supplements I guess. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

jesus tap dancing christ.

the speed at which a vegan IMMEDIATELY shot me down as not good enough has to have been precognition.

but sure, yea, whatever, beans and other plants we are already eating should probably be involved and be more prominent in our diets.

damn!

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

You got served, suckah!!!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Let them eat re-constituted soy!" (I've heard that before, but in a different language).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I agree, we should add some succulent, fattened long pork to our diets.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 days ago (4 children)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Close enough... get the guillotines.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago

“Cost of living too high? KILL YOURSELVES, STREET URCHINS!”

  • the wealthy
load more comments
view more: next ›