this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
74 points (93.0% liked)

Apple

20799 readers
22 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sk8boy204@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago

That sounds like shit; thanks Apple.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Didn’t watch the presentation. Should I assume that anyone wearing an apple watch from now on is recording my audio without consent?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it’s doing on-device summarization. No transcript is retained or sent off.

[–] kingofras@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (11 children)

This is the correct comment. But the one with the assumption is voted higher. Lemmy loving vibes more than facts, day 1,436.

Yes, the audio is never stored, the summaries can be completely turned off, and yes, Apple again is caught inside its own bubble being ever more disconnected from the outside silicon valley life. They should not have touted this so strongly and loudly.

People will these devices are being kidnapped daily and forced to open their devices. Even without the audio some of these transcripts can be used as evidence against them or their families, violating their 5th amendment rights.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s what I’ll be assuming

I wonder how this will be legally interpreted in states with two-party-consent recording laws

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hell, what about 1 party consent where the person doesn't know their watch is recording?

[–] h0tbeef@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago

Excellent point, lmao

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It’s a clever idea, although obviously many consumers are nervous about a proliferation of always-listening devices. The feature will be opt-in and obviously, Apple will tout its stringent privacy-preserving implementation compared to the competition. Apple’s version will not actually store audio recordings, nor will it present a transcript of conversations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it will be functionally different than “recording”. When you talk to Siri or any other voice assistant, does it record your voice or simply transcribe it? This seems to be the latter.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And Apple has always made a point of saying things like this are on-device, not cloud

[–] setsubyou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Nothing changed in that regard. It doesn’t record audio, sound recognition runs on device. In the exact same way that all modern Apple devices (watches, phones, earbuds, …) can already listen for Hey Siri, and other brands listen for their wake words etc.

[–] fourish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It’s transcribing what you say but not saving your voice.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I believe Apple Watch already ships with always on Siri, but I don’t know anyone who left that turned on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago

This is the same shit companies do with their "year in review" shit - a blatant attempt to glamorize and normalize their invasive surveillance, now running 24/7.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh don't worry. All the other apple watches around you will do it just fine with your shadow account.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sounds to be local to the device at least… for now.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 week ago

No it wont, I won't buy it.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I want to hear the summary after just gooning all day

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

"chat, get this guy a gf, please"

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I absolutely do not need this. Journaling is healthy. Take that up instead

Exactly. People love convenience until it removes the only actual benefits of the thing it's replacing, but by then they're dependent on it.

If it listens to things for you so you can look at them 10 seconds later when you realize you didn't hear, why should your brain even bother paying attention to ANYTHING in the moment? If it summarizes your day, how much less are you going to remember because you're just not forcing your brain to think about what you've done today?

I know for a fact I've gotten much better at remembering things that happen throughout my day after I started taking a note every day with what I did. If I had something recording it all for me, I'd just become even more reliant on that thing to even remember what happened at all.

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The new Apple Watch will track your every move.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If I can’t turn it off, I don’t want it.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can turn it off. In fact it says right in the article that it’s off by default.

[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do I turn it off on the devices of people around me?

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I never want pictures of me on Facebook. I simply don't want Meta knowing what I look like.

To protect myself, I avoid having friends or attending family gatherings.

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 7 points 1 week ago

People wearing glasses with thick rims will get sick of showing people that there's no camera and start buying new glasses.

Apple Watch users will stop wearing their watches in public. And finally giving up wearing one altogether.

[–] nunzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

We're so cooked

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago

That's interesting. I don't see how it can generate recaps of my day if I don't ever purchase it.

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

FYI Pebble is back and open source if you want a smart watch without all the bullshit

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Also, is that what apple watches still look like? Eleven years and these visionless assholes can’t meaningfully evolve the industrial design of this fucking nag box?

[–] TeXniker@mathstodon.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

@xenomor
What vision? It’s a wrist watch (with extras), so it should look like one.

For the record: I hate wrist watches.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are you complaining about the hardware or the face?

  • Whats the point of changing the hardware? It’s a simple, shape, already comes in multiple sizes and has the number of buttons that fit.
  • Why complain about the face? Use a different one and now your Apple Watch has more design variety than a couple of dumb watches
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Apple: ‘melted lozenge’ is the platonic ideal for watches

[–] Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Oh no it won't.

[–] charokol@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“You looked at your phone for about 12 hours”. Thanks Apple

For 3 of those hours I looked at my iPad, ok? Thanks.

[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

You took one of your top 3 all time deuces today!

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The panopticon just got retrofitted and I’m not seeing an appropriate reaction. How is Apple getting away with what Alphabet, Microsoft, and Meta already tried and is still getting backlash for??

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That they will harvest to learn how to build a better prison around us all. People who use this shit are traitors to the very notion of freedom, or personal rights at all. They give away prices of their liberty one EULA at a time. Same strategy Putin has used to inch his way to empire without provoking an outright war with any nation that is too dangerous. Heat the water slowly and the frog never notices.

[–] DoctorWhoDMC@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Privacy concerns aside, if you need generated summaries of your own day, I don't know if I can relate to you as a person because wtf are you not paying attention to anything anyone says to you?

[–] rickdg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

EU: "Brought enough for everyone?"

Apple: "Forget I said anything."

load more comments
view more: next ›