this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2026
292 points (96.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41598 readers
3825 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's a whole lot of subpoenas being sent out for a marketing stunt...

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I mean what are they going to charge them with? Isn't the point of suing someone that they have to prove damages. So they would have to prove that slowly releasing information about their game somehow impacted their sales/profits wouldn't they?

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

Profiting off their IP for example. The leaker has their own shitcoin. And chances are the build didn’t just materialise on its own on their Harddrive and some cybercrime was involved to get it, if not just breach of contract.

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Their stock price going down is definitely enough to at least make it to trial. Maybe a jury or judge might determine that it dint actually cause damage overall, but it’d be silly to claim that there isn’t any damage claim whatsoever

If stocks drop because information that hypes people up for your product comes out it's worse than crypto and everyone is being scammed.

The reason the stock is dropping is because they said you'll get a product by x, and the product isn't going to be ready. If you don't make deadlines people think you are incompetent. People don't like to invest in incompetent companies.

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Well, I'm not sure what the burden of proof is exactly, but the argument that the game has a narrative aspect to it and that releasing information about the game, namely information related to the story and plot of the narrative, could spoil the game and curtail potential buyers seems reasonable, at least.

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Do you know house much a team of some of the highest paid IT forensics and lawyers cost? That's before stock and says damages the team will come up with.

They'll be buried with paperwork and costs for their own legal team and looking at wage garnishment as well as be unhireable for anyone doing their due diligence.

It won't be about the money. It'll be about pain for the leaker and discouragement for the next person dumb enough to do it.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'd argue if they sued the guy they should lose lose sales. As such they would be hurting themselves to sue him. Hell I'll just outright say I'll never buy or play another rockstar game if they sue someone for it.

Edit*: To be honest though... I probably wasn't going to play it anyways, lol. I haven't even bothered to look at the leaks. If someone thought leaks would possibly ruin something for them, why would they look at them?

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You guys are crazy. Why would they take legal action for a marketing stunt ? Don’t you think the legal system would clap back if they file just for marketing ? The leeks are real

[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You guys are crazy. Why would they take legal action for a marketing stunt ? Don’t you think the legal system would clap back if they file just for marketing ? The leeks are real

[–] Karl_der_Kleine@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks, this really made my Day!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 1 day ago

The same legal system that frequently gives companies fines that are a tiny fraction of the profits they made breaking the law?

[–] ThreeCheesesalute@lemmus.org -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The legal system? what system? Nothing they’ve done is illegal if this was a rockstar idea originally

[–] istdaslol@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

Seems like your out of the loop. They filed a dmca claim with California courts demanding records from Microsoft to identify the leaker.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gotta keep the hype up. The legal claims are just part of the marketing budget to make more news.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

There is literally nothing anyone could do to change the level of hype in either direction. Publicity stunts are just a waste of money at this point.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

They don't need that. It's not possible to increase the hype for GTA6. It is already at the physical maximum of hype.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How are any of the leaks costing them money or lost profits?

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

The main one is going to be a playable offline build of the game on PC.

[–] jay@pie.zerojay.com -4 points 2 days ago

Leaks as marketing is not a thing and has never been a thing, little bro.