Got to love UNIX's everything is a file.
ProcFS is from Plan9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_9_from_Bell_Labs#/proc
Plan9 is worth a deep dive, but maybe not worth running. It is more UNIX than UNIX. (Also where UTF8 came from.)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
Got to love UNIX's everything is a file.
ProcFS is from Plan9. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_9_from_Bell_Labs#/proc
Plan9 is worth a deep dive, but maybe not worth running. It is more UNIX than UNIX. (Also where UTF8 came from.)
I'm surprised it doesn't mention that /proc/self automagically points to the directory of the current process. So if you're writing a program, you can just look there for information about itself
I didn't know any of this. Amazing. I usually just look at /proc/net/ for routes and bonding config etc.
/proc is quite useful when it comes to hiding root on Android.
I love *nix’s commitment to the bit on the core abstractions.
I’m aware of /proc but usually use lsof to find open fd’s for a process.
Is one better than the other?
lsof just reads from /proc and gives you formatted output
https://github.com/lsof-org/lsof/blob/master/lib/dialects/linux/dproc.c#L297

Okay, this is legitimately cool as heck. This finally helps me wrap my head around the “everything is a file” concept in Linux. Of course it can just copy the executable to memory for later reference. That’s how the system would not completely have a meltdown when you do live updates.
Excellent share!
Wait until you see the Plan 9 API
I bet this is done with inodes. Deleted files aren't truely deleted until nothing has it open and its inode gets dropped. Like ARC for files.
You can also do interesting things like overwrite a "file" (as in a specific filesystem path) with new contents while keeping anything that already has the file open on the old contents by unlinking the old inode to the path and writing the new contents under a new inode. I believe mv does this. The kind of lesser known feature that probably strikes a good balance between preventing super annoying silent errors/corruption and causing them.
Thanks for explaining, I was wondering about that.
Wait, is that why renaming or moving files on android takes forever?
No, that's because Android. It's also overlaying all filesystems to enforce stupid rules, like no files named "CON" and no files named the same in a different case (like in DOS).
It's a bit more interesting than that...
Linux, unlike Windows, will let you delete a file that is actively in use. It removes the reference on the file system but the contents of the file won't be deleted until all file pointers to it close. In fact it will still be seen as taking up disk space until it's garbage collected (deleting a large file that's in use can be frustrating).
So the file is actually still available to that running process. If you replace it with a new executable and run that then you get the new version.
Julia Evans has such great and accessible content, they're awesome
they are a youtuber?
Better, they make zines! https://jvns.ca/
thanks, it's got really hard nowdays to find quality content.
I seem to recall in an Operating Systems class we wrote a kernel module and communicated with it through the proc interface?
I may have been through "SysFS" as well? In /sys/class you can setup char dev IO with a kernel module (and more). Very helpful for userspace <-> kernel communication (like DMA drivers for userspace applications)
Hmm yeah maybe it was /sys, it’s been so long I can’t remember.
I seem to recall echoing into a file to set some value which we then checked the value of in the kernel module code. It was just a hello world type of thing for a college class.
I am saving this, both for the post AND for the comments.
This is awesome, and I really no no idea about this!
We need the whole set of these in one post
THERE'S MORE?
Wait, is there not?
Damn, I really could have made a lot of use of this over the last 20+ years.. Thanks for sharing!
I know what a symlink is, but what is a magic symlink?
Also known as zombie files. If you are unlucky they can take up all space on a drive, or even tmpfs (so your ram) and you can't easily find them. At least until you end the right process or restart.
Had that happen once and had to write my own script to trace it to the log of an open terminal emulator tab that had billions of lines.
A symlink that has been blessed by Richard Stallman.
If you delete a file that's still open by the app, the link in proc will still exist and you can copy the file back out of proc.
Did you know openBSD does not have this folder? I think the BSD's do not use /proc. I do not know why though.
That raises the question of how their ps, top, lsof and such work, since afaik in Linux they read from /proc.
P.S. Looks like BSDs tug at the kernel via syscalls, namely sysctl and also the ‘kvm interface’ in the case of MacOS (not sure what ‘kvm’ thing is meant here). Seems vaguely reasonable, since procfs also queries the kernel for the info, so about the same resources would be used, perhaps even with the overhead of filesystem traversal and string-numbers conversion.
Do you know how to build portable executables?
configure --prefix=/proc/self/pwd
It even works in .so files and libtool.
I would generally just set the RPATH to $ORIGIN in the ELF file
Great tips! Although if i may 🤓 just a little for the top right, it works because what you deleted isn't the binary, it's the pointer that points to the binary's location. The data is still exactly as it was before "deletion"; the symlink is simply a copy of the original pointer's info; and I'm speculating that the existence of any pointer prevents the system from recycling those addressed bits.