PowerCrazy

joined 2 years ago
[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Eh. The national guard could be used as a moderating force. For example they could require that ICE Officers be escorted by national guard members at all times while they enact their "lawful" duties. Failure to be escorted could be declared unlawful action and the transgressing ICE member would be arrested and turned over to federal judicial branch, after a lengthy bureaucratic process. Of course this would require democrat politicians to actually want to disrupt the very system they were elected to uphold.

I also don't think the national guard gives a shit one way or another about any specific private property. In the aggregate as a construct of a capitalistic state, sure they will support capitalism, but in the reality of the individuals who make up the state national guard, they are being abused by the very system they are supposed to protect. They seem fertile ground for revolution. It's not oligarchs and billionaires who join the national guard. It's not senators' sons, and the daughters of NGO founders who are in the national guard. In short, the members of the national guard are not the ones benefiting from our current system, in contrast to the federal officers and police that do benefit.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

"Gun Lobby" is just another capitalistic industry that did successful regulatory capture a century or so ago. Who cares about them. The fact that guns are useful tools is beside the point. It's like claiming that Trump is making a an enemy of John Deere.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

I'm still using DDR3 as I haven't upgraded my computer in like 6years. It's fine. I can play most games at 4k and I'm rocking an Nvidia 4070. I don't really see any compelling reason to upgrade until GTA6 comes out. (I can play gta5 just fine)

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

They don't need an excuse and what do you think the next level of "escalation" would look like in Minneapolis? Armed forces refusing deployment orders? The end of the US? This admin is walking a dangerous line and using the cover of a "law-enforcement" action is doing a lot of work. As soon as it escalates to "putting down an insurrection" everyone in the admin is at risk of being vacated from office, mortally. Trump may not realize it, but the people on the ground will.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Now ban all advertising, please!

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only thing that matters is how clean our power is. If you are worrying about "cost" you are supporting capitalism and the fossil fuel industry. And cost to consumers is extremely misleading mostly as a result of power policy, completely divorced from cost to generate. Nuclear can absolutely be cheap, just end the subsidies on other fuel sources, allowing fuel recycling, and imprison all shareholders, congressmen, and lobbyists of the international energy cartels.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

God I want a nuclear reactor in my literal backyard.

Fortunately I live in Illinois the state that has over 50% of it's power provided by Nuclear, the most in the nation. (As of 2024, Illinois generates 53.62% of electricity from nuclear power, 31.10% from fossil fuels (comprising of coal, natural gas, petroleum, and other gases), and 15.28% from renewables (comprising of wind, solar, hydropower, and biomass)). It will be nice to get the renewable mix up too, but in the meantime I'm quite happy. Electricity isn't the cheapest, but it surely is the cleanest which is the only thing that actually matters.

https://cleanenergy.illinois.gov/tracking-illinois-progress/electricity-generation-mix.html

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Nice. More previous administrations need to be held accountable, even if for the wrong reasons.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Author of the article thinks its "punk rock" to support the blue capitalist party. It's just not realistic to do anything except vote blue no matter who. You have to be an adult about this. Until Communist Jesus arrives and saves us from ourselves, it's just not the right time to do anything except maintain the status quo. Very Smart author.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I mean impeaching cabinet members is kind of pointless innit? Trump can easilly find a replacement that is functionally identical. You have to cut the head off VP+President at the very least. But really just skip all that bullshit and start advocating for a Constitutional Convention, the US government is broken and a CC is the only non-violent option.

 

The idea of "student loan forgiveness for entrepreneurs" is something I noticed 10 years ago during Hillary Clinton's uninspired campaign for president, even before Trump entered the arena as a serious candidate.

Looking at a few search-engine hits filtered for only 2015, and I see the following article. There are a few other derivative articles with same idea.

https://www.nbcnews.com/better/careers/helping-millennial-entrepreneurs-conquer-student-loan-debt-n408636

But basically the idea of this group of young "entrepreneurs" who were saddled by student loans deserved special government attention. Especially from the Clinton campaign.

Kind of weird, but they had a campaign full of weird shit, like Russian Drone submarines, or a no-fly zone over Syria, or the declaration that universal health-care "will never ever happen."

But then 4 years later after Clinton was humiliated, we have her heir-apparent Kamala Harris talking about the same oddly specific policy: "According to her plan, Harris intends to give student loan debt forgiveness to Pell grant recipients who successfully open businesses in underserved communities and operate those businesses for three years."

https://psmag.com/news/kamala-harris-student-debt-forgiveness-plan-part-of-proposal-to-support-black-entrepreneurs/

And now it's 4 years later, and we have a very old representative of New York City, Nydia Velázquez introducing the same policy!

https://democrats-smallbusiness.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4769

Who the fuck is pushing this policy? Who is it for? Why are Democratic Politicians so fixated on this fucking worthless extremely narrowly targeted policy? It's been 10 years, and this policy keeps coming back almost as a slogan. Why?!

 

Garbage Island full of garbage people thinks cars prevent sexual assaults.

 

A pretty standard pro-environmental piece, however I do appreciate how it calls out the "German Green Party," which is obviously just an astro-turfed political party funded by the coal industry.

And of course the criticism of about the farce of Carbon Capture is spot-on.

 

A growing number of Senate Democrats appear open to making it harder for migrants to seek asylum in order to secure Republican support for aiding Ukraine and Israel.

This is what the democrats stand for. Unlimited funding for the MIC and border-control, but social issues are not a priority.

Stop voting for the parties of Capital.

view more: next ›