this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
175 points (97.3% liked)

Fediverse

43296 readers
830 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

idk it's my first time (kind of) trying to do dataviz, I thought the original post was super interesting but like other comments said, it was hard to read.

I think in a way it's mostly because defederation is complex to show as links, since it is the break of said link, but hopefully this type of graph is better ?

you do lose the "group" of instances view, though (and also I did not bother with per instance MAU as raw number + percentage, or sofware used)

let me know what you think!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

So why does everyone hate lemmygrad and hexbear? I'm out of the loop on that.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

they are too extreme for the normal extremists.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

tankie bullshit

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I notice that it presents sites with the same editorial body as separate cases, such as piefed.ca and lemmy.ca. Perhaps it would make sense and potentially improve readability to collapse any cases that have the same in and out arcs as each other. (So, all the cases that have no blocks and only block lemmygrad as one collapsed entry, for example.)

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

It doesn't even Include https://lemmy.today/ that has no defederation or blocking at all, and has never had, since the admin feels it's up to the user and not the admin to decide these things. You know, free and open internet, remember?

Also one of the best themes of all Lemmy instances if you ask me.

[–] Pika@hikki.team 1 points 1 hour ago

Came here to say that!

I can't comprehend why people would join instances in the list. If you don't like a particular instance, just hop into the user settings and block it! Why let others set your blocklist?

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You gotta ask the OOP about that, but my guess is, in a graph that shows instances that defederate, why include an instance that doesn't?

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

I see your point I guess. Perhaps defederation is something that users want, and then they are happy to see who does it the most?

Im not like that myself, but I can see the point.

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Now I am curious what is going on in fedinsfw.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

porn that makes most folks uncomfortable

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Reposting porn from other sites i assune

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Hexbear uses a whitelist so they are not federated with a bunch of these instances besides .world

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

The Hexbear Great Firewall exists to keep the Beanis contained

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 17 hours ago

This makes much more sense thanks

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A bit scarier than the previous one at first glance, but the single line explanation including everything needed to understand makes it easier to read.

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Something though, I think it'd be better to have a cut-off of MAU or some other relevance metric, as otherwise smaller instances defederating from major ones may sneakily make the major one seem more isolated than it really is.

[–] gon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or scale arrow size by MAU, I don't know.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ozoned@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I know lots of folks look at this and see a shattering of the what they expect. The Fediverse is NOT a platform. Lemmy.world is NOT the Threadiverse. Let's break these bonds. I left a server because I was suspected of being a CIA plant. I went to one that was more welcoming. I found they were too strict for me on their rules. I left that. I'm not on piefed.social. I'm planning on running my own piefed for ME and MY family/friends hopefully SOON^TM. If someone defederates from me, that's ok, they didn't want me to be a part of their community. MY community still exists.

These aren't platforms that are out there trying to save the entire world. They're building a community that interconnects to other communities. Don't like how they're doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

Yes, if you want your stuff to be found you have to advocate for it.

I think the Trek communities are stand outs of how this works and how it should be done. Think of like old Forum days. Normally folks would create a forum for a specific topic and other thigns would go other places. But now those forums connect and you can run your own and connect to everyone.

Break this idea that this major pillars disconnecting are fracturing the fediverse. IMO the more small instances we have the stronger the network.

So build a Piefed/Lemmy/Mastodon/GoToSocial/Bonfire whatever for your community and then allow those to connect out to others.

The idea of this change is scary though. And maybe I'm wrong. Maybe we can't exist the way I hope we do. But I think humans strive for community and communication and we have a new way to provide it to them.

[–] Bombastic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago

Well said, agent Johnson.

God bless the U.S. of A

[–] Auster@thebrainbin.org 12 points 1 day ago

Besides, and related to "not being a platform", it helps break the idea of everyone having to share the same space with everyone. If two groups can't have a healthy relationship, it is healthier for them to cut ties with each other. Meanwhile, the oligarchic platforms being as big and with barely any internal borders makes for the toxic environment of places like Reddit and Twitter that predates recent polemics.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

There are 500 Lemmy instances and 80 PieFed instances which are too small to show on the graph :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] testaccount789@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago

Don’t like how they’re doing it, you can literally spin up your own for dollars per month.

Not so easy.
Mostly a liability issue.
First there's security - make sure the server doesn't get compromised.
Then you need to figure out how to deal with illegal content like CSAM (was already a widespread issue on Lemmy at least once, causing multiple instances to shutdown) - even on private instance due to content caching.
And legal issues such as minimum age and privacy regulations that you'd have to comply with.

3rd one is not an issue if you only use it yourself, and perhaps with a couple of friends that won't try to sue you when they get mad.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago

I'm on sh.ijust.works because it has a bad word in it. I don't know what you're all complaining about

[–] Snoopy@piefed.social 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The similar color makes it slightly difficult to read but the graph is better, and easier to understand. Anyways, you are skilled, good job :3

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Yeah the 3 yellows really are hard to differentiate.

[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

In addition to comments others have made about some of the colors being difficult to see/differentiate, I think it would be worthwhile to distinguish one-way defederation from mutual defederation, perhaps with a texture?

It would make the graphic busier, but I also would enjoy seeing population percentages next to each instance name (to give weight to the significance of certain defederations, e.g. how much of the fediverse are you excluding by defederating with hexbear vs lemmy.world).

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

This graph is a lot more understandable, but the yellow is hard to see. I can't tell what instance lemmy.ml is defederating.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I assume for you it may be because of your display type. But that made me think of colorblind people and how much this format probably totally excludes them as an entire swath of the population

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But that made me think of colorblind people and how much this format probably totally excludes them as an entire swath of the population

I'm colorblind. It does :/

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Do you have any design suggestions for op? (Assuming they're the originators of this chart)

Because as it is, this data is pretty hard to concisely portray. Whoever made this decided to use color, alone, which, even for me who is not colorblind, thinks could use some improvement. Design IS hard, the question is how.

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 6 hours ago

Chiming in as the OP, I used rawgraphs.io which only has 2 colour palettes for this amount of data (the first one only covers 7 colors the rest becomes grey), there's the option to pick your own colours and I considered picking colours from instances logos so they would fit. No idea if that would have been better for accessibility. In general there are colourblind-friendly colour palettes suggestions out there and I should have checked them first!

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

In this particular instance, I don't have many suggestions other than, maybe change the saturation?

To give an example, the rainbow pride flag has always looked muddy to me;

But I recently saw a colorblind friendly version that, to my eyes anyway, looks really good. I can much more easily distinguish the stripes in this one:

I don't know the exact mechanics of how these are different. But maybe there's a lesson here about colorblind friendly stats representation?

[–] mobyduck648@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

You've managed to nerd snipe me with the colourblind friendly Pride flag, the second one somehow looks really good!

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

The second flag's colors look extremely well balanced in both brightness and color variance between them. That's weirdly satisfying to look at.

But yeah, just having higher contrast in the chart would be a good start. Maybe some kind of three dimensionality with graded shadows? Or like have them as lines, and have them not have such similar angles? But then I expect that to be messy and not quick to read, either.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] waldfee@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

This graph is indeed a lot more intuitively readable. I think it could be improved further by avoiding needlessly crossing the arrows, like for example pawb.social -> lemmygrad.ml is crossing multiple other arrows, even though they are right next to another. Some arrows could also be shorter to avoid crossings, like beehaw.org -> sh.itjust.works

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Lot of unnecessary lines crossing. Why do the 5 at the top left not just swoop around instead of crossing 2 or 3 others? Why do the two defederating lemmy.world cross each other?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I’m kinda surprised that so many instances have defederated from lemmy.nsfw. It’s just porn, right? Who cares?

Maybe I’m naive and missing an important point. If so, I apologize for my ignorance.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lack of people willing to moderate it? If people want porn there's a million places they can look instead. It makes sense to just remove porn spam from your instance tbh.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dadarobot@lemmy.ml 6 points 23 hours ago

i havent seen any of the discussions leading to this, but i assume the sheer amount of images/video takes up a lot of space, so they instances decided to avoid it altogether.

that and potential risks if something particularly unsavory becomes mirrored on your instance.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

i know blahaj at least defederated it because of "a community for porn of women that appear to be under 18" (direct quotation from a local-only post)

i couldn’t find it myself (there’s a lot of communities on there!) but i’m guessing it’s some sort of "barely legal" porn community, which is gross (but unfortunately very common). so good riddance imo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dil@piefed.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

The way the apps and frontends are setup, its easy enough to use alts for different usecases instead of having porn attached to general instances. Seperating gooner personas from regular is a positive imo. Keep that energy on the nsfw instances, banning them isn't like reddit getting rid of a community, everyone still can sign up and access it on the same app they already use. I always hated scrolling on r/all and seeing porn every 5 posts (nsfw tag covers a lot of non porn) Doesn't mean I don't use reddit for porn, I think I wouldve preferred having an alt there that only showed porn subs and vice versa with my main account showing none. Some seperation is healthy imo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quill7513@anarchist.nexus 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

One point of order, you lost slrpnk.net's defederation of hexbear.net

[–] inlandempire@jlai.lu 1 points 6 hours ago

Ah my bad I gotta redo it now

[–] yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

When I saw it I thought of this quote: "Why Is It When Something Happens, It's Always You three?" Tbh I didn't know about 2 of 3 Top 3 defederated instances, I know why feddit is defederated, but why is lemmygrad?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago

nifty strongly curved arrows

I should sort my ties this way…

load more comments
view more: next ›