this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
450 points (98.9% liked)

World News

57354 readers
1868 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Stonewyvvern@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

That's my bad...I was super gassy the other week. I'll back on the beans and onions.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Crypto farming, feeding the ai bubble, large scale wars of aggression, commuters replacing cars with trucks, buying throwaway junk has never been easier. That's the relatively new completely unnecessary hubris that I can think off atm. These should be the low hanging fruits to just not do, but apparently we're going to continue doing them anyways. If we can't address the low hanging fruits, then tackling the harder challenges will remain a pipe dream until it's too late. Climate stability is fucked, and we're in for a rough ride.

[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 1 points 46 seconds ago

The real "low hanging fruit to not do" is blaming individual choices for societal issues. Capitalism is the one and only reason for anthropogenic climate change. Ending capitalism is the one and only way to solve it. There is no individual action you can take that is effective, we have to reorder society in such a way that it is impossible to profit from environmental destruction.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

We can't even stop a rise in fascism, an incredibly stupid thing, across the globe. We don't stand a chance against global warming. We're cooked.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

We've done more in the last five years to curb fossil fuel consumption than at an point in human history.

From a massive pivot to renewable energy to our Green-Centric foreign policy of blowing up Nordstrem II, embargoing Venezuela, and shutting down the Straight of Hormuz, we are absolutely turning a corner on future fossil fuel consumption.

Donald Trump may go down in history as the most climate friendly leader in our generation. A hundred thousand Greenpeace activists could not have achieved in their lifetime what he's done in less than two terms as president.

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

So we need more taxes to fail stopping it with windmills and solar panels trash? but no one plants trees? yeah, trees are not profitable.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Goes outside

Ah shit, no way!

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I wasn't aware they could close them.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago
[–] bobbbu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (12 children)

There is some hope if we chip at it as much as we can. No action is too small:

  • less travelling. Life is fun near home. Happiness isn't tied to an airplane and a beach far away
  • eat less animals. You ll get used to whatever diet in a few weeks. It doesnt have to be vegan or nothing. Also, beans are delicious:)
  • bamboo toilet paper. Grows fast, renewable.
  • plant bushes, trees. Look up local resilient species. I've been planting everywhere I can. You can call your local municipality, they have regreening programs.
  • buy less stuff. Available tech is already good enough.
  • vote with your wallet. This is the only real power we have over corporations, imo. Lots of great easy to repair brands. Fair trade, etc.

If we convince ourselves we are screwed, we ll give up. Be the hero of your own story. YOU DO NOT NEED TO GET IT 100% RIGHT. Any improvement is improvement. We all live different lives, and the economy is hard on alot of us.

I believe:)

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Individual action was a myth designed by FF companies to shift responsibility

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

vote with your wallet

"I don't think I'll super size it after all", I saw as I drive past the MegaCity One GigaChad data center.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

less travelling

Lol. I don't think anyone reading this is going to stop the minimal traveling they do in the short breaks from The Grind that they get while dipshit rich people are yachting and jetting all over the planet. And they shouldn't. Average people shouldn't have to give up any travelling whatsoever because their budgets prevent them from doing enough to actually cause significant harm anyway. We need to use force to make the real culprits adjust their habits.

Other than that I fully agree.

[–] chinaski@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, you missed the mark. The individual is not the problem and will not make an iota of difference.

Billionaires are the enemy. They are useless. They are pitting the average citizen against one another. There is no good billionaire.

https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/billionaires-emit-more-carbon-pollution-90-minutes-average-person-does-lifetime

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] chinaski@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 hours ago

The kys comedy is too low hanging fruit nowadays. Do better.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago

If we dont support billioniares business is, and turned "the individual" into an organized mass, it would work.

I dont know if this opinion, to change using amazon and the other big retailers, will ever come though. I saw someone legit promoting aliexpress for a product not too long ago, and I was surprised no one gave them shit for it.

If Working for and using, for example, amazon, was suddenly shamed and everyone stopped using it, it would stop making the billionaire at the top money. If no one buys the product, no one is willing to work for the company, the company would disolveand bezos still wouldnt be broke, or held to account, but this revenue stream would stop.

Will it happen though? I feel like a nhilist for saying, I dont think so.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

bamboo toilet paper. Grows fast, renewable

The bidet gang would like a word with you.

(Seriously though: I agree that every action counts, but I also think that, even if the majority of the population followed that list perfectly, the globalized corporate structure would still be operating in such a way that the personal impact wouldn't be noticeable. When agriculture produces more than what's sold, they have no issue dumping the items that don't sell into the ground. Clothing outlets will shred unsold merch instead of giving it away. The waste is built into the system and a structural change is needed NOW if we are to survive.)

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

If there was a decline in consumption of climate harming products, large enough that these companies could see it in thier financial reports, I cant believe it wouldnt have any effect on the market.

Youre points are valid, and I agree with them, but if a majority wanted to (ideally, and I dont think they will) I think "voting with our wallet" would work, it is simple, but not practical because humans seem to love convience.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

and yes, more putting the onus on us, when all of our individual yearly pollution barely amounts to a day of pollution released by average industry.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 9 points 7 hours ago (7 children)

I understand the sentiment, but doesn't "the industry" essentially produce things that are for "us", even if indirectly?

Factories don't exist for their own sake, they exist to make an end product for people. So if you want to change that, we do need to consume less, like the parent you replied to said.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ClamDrinker@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think you should think about it in terms of blame, I think that's a big part of the propaganda. Seeding of anger, frustration, and apathy. Rather than allowing empowerment, organizing, and hope.

Blame should only be reserved for those that act with careless disregard. And doing things that are good for the environment shouldn't be seen as 'paying back'. You are actively doing more than you should and letting your actions speak louder than your words. And those actions can (and should) be part of building the collective that will force those truly responsible from stopping.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Spooge@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

EDIT: WHOOPS! Wrong comment.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Where did I even allude to that?

I very clearly laid out where the problem is that we have to deal with. Which is the actual drivers of climate change. Not you choosing to drive to work instead of walking 8 miles in the heat.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Your first point is so huge IMO. If you can't enjoy being at your own home then trying to have some kind of fulfilling life is going to be a steeper uphill battle than it already was.

Look at it like the Buddhists and stoics. Thinking your happiness is out there waiting on some beach, or in some fancy car or McMansion, is only going to perpetuate your suffering in the actual real now.

Or put another way, if you decide to find happiness and fulfillment in your home and your local community, and it works, then THEY can't stop you. Whoever that is in your case.

[–] Hazor@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Your first point is so huge IMO. If you can’t enjoy being at your own home then trying to have some kind of fulfilling life is going to be a steeper uphill battle than it already was.

Been on the dating apps recently. The number of people who present "travel" as their entire personality is unsettling. Every photo somewhere exotic, every prompt answer is about traveling. It makes me wonder what they're all running from. I don't disagree that vacationing can be enjoyable, but there's more to life.

And don't get me started on the people who try to say that "traveling" is different from "vacationing" and that what they're doing is travelling and not vacationing. Egads.

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 hours ago

Prolly they all live in a big city. And living in a big city sucks ass, but most people have no choice because that's where the jobs are. I luckily live outside a big city in small village with forests and fields around me. But still near enough a medium-sized city so that I don't have to commute for ages. But I see that not everyone can live in places like mine, so the big city it is, where it is loud and full. Kinda understandable that u want to get away from it, then. But yeah, it doesn't mean that u need to fly to other side of the earth to do vacation, usually your own country has enough pretty spots to spend ur vacation.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

And vote. Pay attention to issues and vote. Don’t get caught up in a single issue, or voting with emotions or spite: vote for your future

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, we can do that, but keep in mind that unilateral individual actions will not make the difference, all you can do is trying to create more broad awareness, form coalition and support for tighter laws and regulation, in order to have meaningful effect.

Also avoid blaming or moralizing individuals for their own choices, this will cause fatigue and infighting, which will distract from focus on policy change.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boomlandjenkins@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The US military is one of, if not the largest, enemy of the environment. Every one of us could do our part but without militaries being mindful too, the environment is cooked.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›