208
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

It was a loaded diaper, but not like you would think.

Security officers found 17 bullets concealed inside a disposable baby diaper Wednesday at New York’s LaGuardia Airport, the Transportation Security Administration said.

Officers pulled the otherwise clean diaper from a passenger’s carry-on bag after it triggered an alarm in an X-ray machine at an airport security checkpoint, the TSA said.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Omnificer@lemmy.world 140 points 6 months ago

What's actually news worthy is that TSA managed to catch this. Their success rate is abysmal, so I'm sure this is a big confidence boost for them.

[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago

In their defense, they stare at a screen all day looking for contraband. The human brain can only do a task like that well for maybe 15 minutes before zoning out.

I know people who worked in manufacturing. There was a quality control position where a worker had to look at glass going by them on a assembly line looking for defects. They studied how long a person could reliability do that before they started missing defects. It was only about 10 minutes.

I think if that story every time I go to the airport, or when the TSA get trashed for missing half of the weapons they're supposed to be searching for.

AI should be used to assist roles like that.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 months ago

Have you ever looked at their screen? This isn't a 1970's scan, the computer automatically flags anomalies and makes a box around them.

[-] Beetschnapps@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Speaking from experience they seemed to actually catch more back then regardless.

I miss the days of a magnetometer and keeping my shoes on.

[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That's good to hear.

No, I can't really get a look at them. They're positioned to hide the screen an my airport. Well and airport security is a pain, so I'm trying to get through as quickly as possible.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

When I went to the airport last time they had one of those full body scan things we have to wave your arms in the air. I don't understand why I wasn't allowed to look at the picture, it's a picture of me. I want to see it.

It's night and day flying out of the US to somewhere in Europe. You go through all the rigmarole of TSA on the US side. Then when you land on the other side of the Atlantic they go "you look all right" and leave you alone.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You were not allowed to look at the photo mostly because the security can't be arsed to deal with your bullshit.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah but it took longer to say no than it would have to just turn the screen around so they're just being dick heads.

And they do love to do that. Then the most unpleasant people it's like they actually have a job and their job isn't security their job is to be unpleasant awkward unhelpful rude and aggressive.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Probably, but letting every tourist have a look on it, take photos, organize toured xray picnics and have their ass eaten in security check will just complicate their life. I do recognize they're assholes, but in this case I would do the same. Not my fucking job to tend idiots

[-] geogle@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

They're constantly being switched out at my airport (ATL). Either they are on a similarly short schedule, or I'm lucky enough to always hit shift change :/

[-] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

Very much this. Four times I’ve accidentally flown with live ammo in my carry on and gotten through the TSA checkpoint unflagged. I can also verify that the hand swab thing they do doesn’t pick up gunpowder.

[-] NataliePortland@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago

So then it’s not just a funny username

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 53 points 6 months ago

Why the hell would anyone need to carry bullets that badly?

The TSA identified the passenger as a man from Arkansas…

Never mind.

[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 43 points 6 months ago

the passenger initially claimed he didn’t know how the bullet-filled diaper ended up in his bag.

If anything, it just confirms how irresponsible they are.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago

He said he suspected his gf did it...

Like, why just bring bullets but no gun?

That's something entirely nonsensical even for an idiot that tries to smuggle a gun onto a plane.

But, if someone wanted to fuck another person over for any number of reasons....

Hiding some bullets in their carry on would do the trick.

[-] InEnduringGrowStrong@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 months ago

Who knows, maybe it's just my gf doesn't have a bunch of bullets in her pockets to shove in a bag while I'm not looking.
Whether it's him or her, that household kinda has an issue with safe firearm/ammo storage and handling.

[-] Duranie@literature.cafe 7 points 6 months ago

Back in the early 80's my sister was planning to travel with her infant son to get some time away from her husband (abusive addict when he'd relapse - real life Jekyll/Hyde.) She was waiting to board a plane in Chicago when several police pulled her, stating they'd gotten a call that she was carrying a bomb. All she had was a diaper bag with baby things, her purse, and saltines as she'd developed an ulcer.

They let her go once they realized what the situation was, but manipulative people can really create nightmares.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

And who knows.

Maybe this guy is an abusive asshole, and this is the gfs way of getting rid of him.

Maybe she's abusive and he was running from her.

But it's just a more believable situation that she planted it than someone really being dumb enough to try and smuggle less than $20 of bullets but not a gun.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

I used to run a CNC laser. It would cut 2-d shapes out of metal up to 19mm thick.

We had a supervisor who was going on a trip once, and we joked about cutting out the silhouette of a handgun and sewing it into the lining of a carryon bag. We didn't do it, but I could see a stunt like that causing problems.

[-] pohart@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

It looks like they came from two different boxes too. Like she wanted to include both in case one didn't get detected as easily.

[-] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 21 points 6 months ago

That's just what happens when you feed fully loaded guns to babies. Bullets are the corn of the consumed weapons world.

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I know this is satire but with the shit I've seen come out of america I would nit he surprised if someone has actually tried to feed their baby a loaded gun

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 17 points 6 months ago
[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space -1 points 6 months ago

iT's MuH rIgHt To HaVe A gUn On A pLaNe

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 12 points 6 months ago

The dumb thing is this wasn't even a gun, just bullets. Bullets are easy and legal to buy so why smuggle them?

[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Plausibly similar to people who have built bombs out of stuff that wouldn't normally be suspicious to airport security

It reminds me of the person who built a bomb in a airplane toilet with a casio watch and some other things

[-] NAXLAB@lemmy.world 14 points 6 months ago

Löded dïper

[-] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

All that trouble over maybe $10 worth of ammunition... You'd think they'd just quietly drop it in the trash or something. It's not like it's some kind of ultra-precious irreplaceable unobtanium or something.

[-] highenergyphysics@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Yeah this ain’t 5.7mm we’re talking about here

[-] Butterpaderp@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

TSA will do anything to justify their existence. Finding anything related to weapons is like pornography to them.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 6 months ago

TSA are pointless. Airport security is a necessity but you don't need the level of stupid that they go to. Every time they find anything it's because of the metal detector or an x-ray scan, not some super high level training.

They should just go back to having normal security. It's equally as effective and doesn't cost as much. Plus no more security doesn't drop my iPad.

[-] CADmonkey@lemmy.world -3 points 6 months ago

"BUT IT'S MAH RIGHTS TO CARRY BULLETS ON THIS AIRPLANE! FREEZE PEACH!"

/s

[-] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 6 months ago

I remember when I was a teenager flying back from a hunting trip and I had my sister with me, the TSA did their usual routine of giving me a hard time because they think fucking with the autistic kid is funny, she breezed through, we get on the plane and are in the air when she nudges me and pulls A HANDFUL OF SHOTGUN SHELLS out of her pocket. Like, put those things the FUCK back in your pocket.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

the otherwise clean diaper

I love that part. You mean he didn't put his bullets in a shit-filled diaper?

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 3 points 6 months ago

How else do you get shitgun ammo?

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago

Löded Diper

[-] EvilMonkeySlayer@kbin.social 6 points 6 months ago
[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Probs leading to an ass shooting.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Which is just bizarre because on their own, bullets aren't dangerous.

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I mean, it is still a few grams of explosive.

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
208 points (98.1% liked)

News

21695 readers
2959 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS