this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
404 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40610 readers
3512 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone will now avoid sony, right???

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 1 points 7 hours ago

Been enjoying old games and a large backlog for quite a while. No intention to buy the latest and greatest anymore.

But I'm old.

No resale, no buy.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

You got nothing to lose, but your subscription fees.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 30 points 19 hours ago

They held out until Linux gaming got good. Now they're not needed anymore.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

I assumed this was memeing the fact that they removed access to movies that people legitimately purchased without a refund, then saw the news that killed physical games...

[–] asmoranomar@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago (6 children)

I know this sucks, but idk how to feel about it. I had a large collection of physical games, much like I'd imagine most gamers do, only to one day come home and find it all stolen. Insurance pulled the rug on me, and I didn't get much for any of it. Since then I've bought everything digital and, while I know it can happen, I haven't had any taken from me since. Of course, buying all the games physically would have been way more expensive as some of them are rare collectables now. I'm just happy I get to play them. I know I could lose it all again on a whim of some CEO, but I just feel there isn't any reasonable solution.

Make sure you guys keep receipts, take pictures, secure your games, and pay extra for any collectables insurance. And don't let insurance dictate the aggregate value lost, itemize everything and get quotes. You'll still get ripped off, but hopefully you can rebuild what's important if it happens to you.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t keep my physical games, I buy and sell them regulary, so I keep my cost per game low, even for new titles. My problem with digital is that I cannot resell, it’s just a license I rent for full price

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

Reselling does nothing for Sony though, so losing the customers who are buying and selling used games isn't a loss for them.

It's like how people freaked out about how Netflix would surely collapse when they cracked down on password sharing, but it's actually brought in a bunch more money for them. Losing viewers who aren't paying for the service was actually a bonus. Even if there had been a bet zero change in subscribers, they'd save money from the reduction in traffic.

[–] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 6 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Thing is, if "digital" actually meant "own" we wouldn't even be having this conversation. Is this one of those things where the old "block chain" could be helpful? Like, a mechanism for actual digital ownership where one can have reasonable assurance that the thing one has downloaded actually belongs to them? That, so long as there's a unique key, one can access that digital item whenever one desires--AND can transfer that to someone else by way of sale or trade?

[–] asmoranomar@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

At the risk of now upsetting cryptobros (but no, I'm sure they understand all too well): we need laws. not blockchain. Even if the perfect solution was created (looks at physical), there is no incentive for publishers to use it.

And we've already seen what amazing things publishers have done with blockchain. /s

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So far, it’s been very rare for digital ownership of games not to stay preserved. Ex: You can’t buy games from the Wii U anymore, but can still install owned ones. Some games are delisted from Steam, but you can install them.

Notable exceptions: Online games (not helped by discs) and Sony’s big attack on movie licenses.

In terms of resale ownership, yeah, it’s not so favorable. I’m ambivalent on that, because resale motivated a lot of changes in games - more online, more perpetual GAAS, fewer short singleplayer experience.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago

I've never been one to sell games, but I give, lend, and borrow games frequently with my friends. This (and some locked away exclusives) are the only reason I still even own consoles. Sony et al have decided they don't want my money anymore.

[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I've said this before it's indefinite access you're paying for when you buy a disc not ownership of the game. The only difference is, is that you don't lose access to those games when you buy physical, when you buy digital your games access can be heavily modified.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

while I know it can happen, I haven’t had any taken from me since.

I had a couple hundred bucks worth of titles in my Amazon Digital Comics account when they shut all that down.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago

Unironically, I can see physical game theft rising again as the supply is cut off altogether and plastic rot destroys what already exists.

Screwed from both sides.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Now Sony cuts out the middle man and steals it from you directly.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I think that for now Nintendo Sony and Microsoft are keeping old stores accessible even if it costs them because they calculated the negative PR would cost them more (people wouldn't hoard digital licenses for titles that don't have time to play if they knew there's a potential to be removed from their account before first install)

Ubisoft instead had no problems in removing titles from the Uplay accounts, instead

[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And as someone else pointed out in a different thread. No reselling disks or giving to friends.

Everyone has to buy their own downloaded copy per account.

And they dont have to soend the money for the reader. And the game company doesnt have to distribute hardware and can take more profit from the retailers.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great chance to lay off thousands of retail workers ❤️

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago

We never had game shops around me that look like the ones we saw online in other countries, those looked like relatively cool places to have around. I also once told a friend coming from the US to buy me a whole bunch of used games from a Gamestop and I was amazed how cheap they were. We only had overpriced originals or super cheap pirated games here, used cheap originals were neat.

I wouldn’t hang out in such a place as an adult (and I’m icked by retail-as-community-space) but maybe as a teenager it would have seemed nice. Just being able to ask the people working there for opinions or recommendations was probably a big part of how games work for people I’d imagine.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

At that point why not just play it on PC? Are people seriously going to buy a console that doesn't even read a disk, just to download a game from the internet? (Or worse, play via a launcher?)

Also, are the games gonna be cheaper now that they don't need to produce the disks and packaging, transport them, store them in warehouses, stock them on shelves, etc.?

If supply and demand were a real science, this would represent infinite supply, right? So, wouldn't you expect the price to approach 0.00?

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Are people seriously going to buy a console that doesn't even read a disk, just to download a game from the internet?

Are you seriously asking? Because I've seen time and time again, the answer to those kinds of questions seems to be yes. I think most people just don't care, and they don't need to, they'll only buy a few games in a console's lifespan to play for multiple years, and they'll either just pick up what's popular, or whichever one has a game they want to play.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Do they realize they can get their favorite console's controller with a USB cable so they can still use it to play on their PC?

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Nope. If you ever need a reality check, use your own family as a basline.

I'm sometimes reminded there are two Teslas in our family.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

So you want me to use your family as a baseline, you mean? Ain't no teslas in my family.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 27 points 1 day ago

It was just bound to happen. The moment Xbox had dropped the ball and PS became the monopolist, it was obvious that they would start doing some extremely predatory shit and that's just it. There you have it. The enshittification at it's finest.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago
[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is this what's happening with the data centers, too? We'll be expected to access the internet through the cloud or centralized servers, so it doesn't matter to big tech that computer parts are unaffordable to consumers? For the record, I am not happy about it.

Somebody educate me, please. It's worse when I don't know exactly what's happening.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. We will priced out or in the long term even forbidden from owning the hardware needed to run games and other demanding sofware natively. All this to grant us the honor to rent back what we used to own through the cloud

[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean... the internet is the cloud and such? Your local computer isn't generating the internet. The internet is all the accessible things from all the computers plugged in to it.

Theoretically browsing the internet is an extremely low demand thing to do with a PC. It used to be considered one of the lowest, until modern browsers became mostly one browser and every company decided it's job was to harvest as much of your data as possible.

Not sure what the image is referencing exactly, but recently Sony announced they plan to kill off disks entirely, and so their games and everything will all be digital download... and also they just straight up deleted 551 movies they'd sold for years to tons of people, with no refunds or fucks given, because... I guess they didn't want to pay to renew their license to sell them? And decided to make it retroactive. Because fuck poor people.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I, for one, have plenty of games to last me a lifetime. If I have to build another PC, even at these prices, I will because at least steam is not as predatory.

[–] snerkbleat@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

GOG is better.

[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plus worst case you can always just pirate it.

[–] AngryRedHerring@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Or best case, even. ;)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

Reverse that and we're golden.

load more comments
view more: next ›