this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
451 points (99.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

11720 readers
3278 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 19 minutes ago

Well in fairness to ford this is the first time that any company has ever tried to replace all their stuff with AI. There has been no prior attempts and therefore no cautionary tales they could possibly have learnt from. This was an utterly unavoidable mistake and no one needs to be fired over it.

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

"Yeah I'm really into cars"

drives a Mustang

lmao, sure thing, buckaroo

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 hours ago

They didn't buy the hype; they knew it was bullshit from the start. Seriously, do we think upper-level management can't understand such a simple message that we've been repeating for years? ... Of course they knew; they always knew; they got bonuses for pretending not to know.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 10 points 7 hours ago

Im glad they are struggling. All corporations are bad.

[–] jack_of_sandwich@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Hope the engineers asked for significant hikes over their previous salaries

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 51 minutes ago

i would asked at least triple, and 1-2 years(for each worked previously) of severence if laid off again.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

There was a brief time in the early 90s when Object-Oriented Programming was still new to the business world. Clueless managers thought it meant somebody could draw a box labeled "Do Payroll" and somehow software would appear. They're doing that same thing now with AI.

[–] Hasherm0n@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Clueless managers and completely misunderstanding new trends, name a more iconic duo.

Except object oriented programming is a real thing that exists.

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

The one good thing about ai is that it exposes the morons

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Funny thing is, its all in the C-suite.

Listen to your engineers for gods sake

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Idk of it even does though.. Who at ford is going to take the rap for this?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 35 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (6 children)

So scary to realize these business barrons have zero qualms with putting our lives in the hands of untested technology to make a few more buck to light their already full coffers and that it’s already happening with AI

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The American business model is obsessed with cutting costs to raise profits. Increasing market share and developing new streams of revenue all have an investment cost and take time. Cutting labour has no immediate cost and it makes line go up for the next quarter, and that's what their compensation packages are dependent on.

That's why the idea of AI is so attractive to pretty much every CEO, it's the business hack to reduce labour cost that they've been looking for since we outlawed slavery.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 53 minutes ago

i would like to see the day when a PE firm buys ford, GM.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

It's because their positions are often like that "rest of the owl" drawing meme, only it makes sense to them because other people do the filling in of the details and solving the problems. So when an AI can produce the early part of that drawing and confidently promises that it can fill in the rest of the owl, they see it as the same as what their teams were doing prior and unironically believe that them saying "ok, go do that" is the important part, so an LLM should be as competent as a team of engineers.

It takes an engineer who knows the material well enough to see that LLM accuracy is incredibly low, even when it seems to be making sense.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It takes an engineer who knows the material well enough to see that LLM accuracy is incredibly low, even when it seems to be making sense.

This was my take until even this year, but honestly it has improved since a year or even six months ago.

It still lies to you and needs to be given pointers constantly, and many other caveats, but the reality is that all of the investment and coming up with the failure loop perfected by Claude Code changed things IMO.

It's really depressing to think about how all of these rich fucks set a trillion dollars on fire to eliminate one of the only good paying careers available. It's almost like it's time to riot or something. 🤷

I still don't think that means the c suite will be able to fire all of the programmers. It'll still be the nerds' job to get the robot to produce the software. It's likely just to going to make life more miserable for the remaining programmers because more and more will be expected of less of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] viertesauge@feddit.org 74 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Did they include "do not hallucinate" in the prompt? Didnt think so. Classic mistake

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 31 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

"Write program worth 1 million dollars. Do not hallucinate. No mistakes. Good code only. Make secure. No vulnerabilities. Follow all standards. No spaghetti code. No anti-patterns. No deprecated dependencies. Runs fast, and cheap, and completely functionally. Does what it is supposed to. Minimize token use."

Perfect. Iron-clad. Let the profits commence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] warbond@lemmy.world 41 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

Unbelievably, this is real advice I've heard from corporate AI experts.

[–] PoorYorick@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago (6 children)

It is included in the guardrails for my orgs copilot integration. Surprisingly, it still hallucinates.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If you ask chatgpt for 100 5 letter words around a single topic, instead of saying it can't give you 100 words it will just start adding 6 letter words and then start cutting off a letter.

It's astounding how much faith people put in this software

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Classic Ford

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

How did rehire affect pay?

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 19 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Bingo.

If I were one of those engineers then the only way they'd get me back is by offering me a shit ton more cash.
And even then I'd be actively looking for another job asap because, let's face it, the next time a Ford corporate goon feels they could fire me and replace me with a bag of shit to make their profit line go up then they would do in a heartbeat.

[–] Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Not sure how it works where you are but in my country companies had started this trend where they began laying off “overpriced” programmers programmers who’d been hired in the dotcom boom, had remained loyal employees for decades and (here’s the real point) were reaching retirement age. They ‘offer a package’ (early retirement) and then manage out anyone who didn’t take it. Comes to pass that these devs have such deep domain expertise alongside their technical abilities that the majority of them get hired back as consultants at what amounts to a name-your-rate deal. Learn from us. Take the package and go freelance.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 46 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Imagine all the recalls they didn't do because being sued and settling costs less

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 38 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The people responsible for this obviously stupid mistake were replaced, right? Right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 29 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

🤣 How Ford Is Embracing AI To Drive Innovation In The Automotive Industry

Nov 23, 2025, 04:58pm EST

Today, Ford is betting on the next stage of technology innovation--AI. With annual revenues of $185 billion, Ford ranks 19 on the Fortune 1000, and markets automobiles and commercial vehicles across the globe. So, how does a company that pioneered an earlier era of innovation adopt the next wave, manifested by artificial intelligence (AI), to optimize its business operations for the next generation of customers?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›