this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
308 points (99.4% liked)

News

38224 readers
1633 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Several months before blue strips started floating to the surface of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, a company involved in its last renovation more than 15 years ago was approached with an opportunity to do this remodel as well. But the company said no.

Specifically, it balked at two requirements – the Trump administration wanted it done by July 4, and the pool bottom had to be blue, according to two employees with the New Jersey-based Sika Corporation, which provided the concrete construction and sealing products for a 2010 renovation project to the Reflecting Pool.

According to the two employees, who spoke to CNN on the condition they not be identified, both demands made the job “unfeasible.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Wait, people were driving on the reflecting pool just after the bottom was painted blue?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

His upcoming appearance in front of the pool (because milli vanili canceled and are dead) will be at 9pm for... important secret reasons.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 96 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the time delay made it unfeasible because to paint something - even if it's polyurethane based or epoxy based- you have to dry it out first. otherwise the moisture does bad things. (aka, causes it to not adhere properly.)(aka causes it to flake off.)

It's rather like painting over wet drywall mud.

The "it must be blue" because blue absorbs more light than white- and that caused the massive algae bloom.

But Trump is a moron who can't comprehend just how fucking stupid he is, or that he's not the smartest person in the room; so of course he gave it to his buddy who was happy to do it for a "small" bonus, even though that guy is at least as stupid as Trump is.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And apparently they drove on it, like an entire motorcade

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (4 children)

that probably didn't actually do any harm...

the water weighs more than even trump's fat ass.

[–] Kvoth@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

It does, but it's essentially static weight distributed over the whole thing, rather than specific moving points if pressure

[–] Fluke@feddit.uk 9 points 6 days ago

Yeah... Those big "slashes" claimed to have wrecked the coating? Likely done by the edges of the tyres of the motorcade.

Water may be heavier, but it applies that pressure evenly, not in very narrow strips.

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 4 points 6 days ago

The contact area of a vehicle is a few sq cm however, and is applied with torque.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

It's more about the friction from the tires

[–] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'd think you'd want the bottom to be black, so that it reflects the surroundings instead of being visible. You say the blue color caused the algae bloom by absorbing more light, is that a temperature thing? I would think absorbing more light would leave less for photosynthesis. I thought the algae bloom was caused by not maintaining the filtration system.

It's classic Trump, slap a coat of paint on a problem instead of fixing the rot underneath. Change the aesthetics while destroying the purpose of it. I'm just amazed he didn't paint it gold.

slap a coat of paint on a problem instead of fixing the rot underneath.

I think you just described why he wears orange makeup everyday

[–] fulcrummed@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

The impact of the blue (Or any dark ) paint was that it absorbs more radiation from sunlight, increasing the temperature of the water in the pool. It’s this temperature increase which gives rise to the algal bloom. Theoretically painting it black would have been even worse.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Obama painted the bottom ~~black~~ grey for the better reflection.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't see why they just don't replace with water with a blue mirror for a real good reflection.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Preferably a parabolic one that automatically focuses sunlight at StarLink satellites

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They're too stupid to understand bodies of water are blue because they reflect the sky. Typical failure to grasp a simple idea by the a profoundly stupid and incurious child rapist.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

... That isn't why water is blue though...

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I know you think you're being clever, but the sky is blue because it reflects the water, too. It only works with sunlight, which is why everything would look blue if you stood in a small room with water, air, and the sun.

[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

You shouldn't have started your comment with an insult to their intelligence and then immediately talked bollocks. Now I'm duty-bound to correct your arrogant nonsense.

the sky is blue because it reflects the water

Nope. It's blue because the atmosphere filters out bluer light.

It only works with sunlight

Nope. There's nothing special about sunlight, you can reproduce the effect experimentally with a torch and a tube of water

everything would look blue if you stood in a small room with water, air, and the sun.

What? How you gonna fit the sun into a small room?

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The sky is blue due to differential scattering. Blue light scatters more than red. That's also why sunsets are red. It's the remaining light passing through the atmosphere.

Water is often blue due to reflecting the sky. It also has a slight blue tint. This is only obvious in large, deep bodies. It's why the sea around some tropical islands looks so blue. They are volcanoes, so the water drops off rapidly. That much water has a significant blue colour. The sky then adds to it.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The sky then adds to it.

AH HA! So you admit that I'm right that the sky is blue, which makes the water blue, which makes the sky blue! If only we could harness this perpetual blue for energy production...

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The sea doesn't make the sky blue. The sky simply is blue for most of the day.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

The sky simply is blue for most of the day.

Yeah, when the water is blue.

^For real, though, I'm starting to feel bad about this persona I started, and I'm probably gonna stop now.^

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

... That isn't why the sky is blue though...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Online commentators have also speculated that the bottom of the pool may have been affected by the presence of heavy equipment and trucks — and a presidential motorcade that drove through at one point — shortly after the coating was applied.

Ravi Kurani, President of Standard Water Corp, an industrial technology company, told CNN he would never recommend driving cars out onto a pool surface, especially when renovations are being done.

“It’s like you’re putting flooring on your kitchen floor and then you’re take a really heavy tractor on top of it – it’s going to mess it up a little bit.”

lol

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Never heard about the motorcade thing until I read the story. That’s not just everyday stupidity - that’s a whole new level of moronic.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd heard about it and seen the photos. If it was indeed vandalized, these are the vandals. I hope they get arrested soon. They've got a long record of destroying things and need to be stopped.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Dude can't even walk 100 yards.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, in what way is this not a distraction from child rape and mass murder from starting pointless wars (to distract from child rape) ?

Back to basics ppl, unconscionable abuse and straight up murder, or, a water feature in Washington.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

Yeah I agree that this is a distraction from far more serious shit.

Unlike many other times when the thing people claim is a distraction is in itself as serious as a heart attack.

Yet I don't see any "NOW where's the Epstein files" meme here. It's like they purposely only post it in posts about serious issues.

[–] lividweasel@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Unconscionable abuse and straight up murder, and, a water feature in Washington.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You can talk about all three just fine. Not only do Republicans love a pedophile, but they also love an incompetent and corrupt pedophile.

The owner of the Greenwater company is also in the Epstein files so it all ties together nicely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] taco@anarchist.nexus 21 points 1 week ago

could further enflame mounting criticism that the project was rushed and potentially improperly completed.

Potentially?

We were promised a result that "will last for at least 50 years" and "if you had a knife, you couldn't even cut it" that didn't make it a month. This situation is my current litmus test to determine if I'm interacting with a propaganda bot or not. This job being improperly completed is potentially the most certain fact in the news today.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably objected to the requirement to kick back half the project's funding to Trump.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump probably has all the kickback he needs from the Iran deal.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The point of a game of monopoly isn't to have a comfortable cushion of cash, the point is to drive everyone else into abject poverty and own the board.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even so, part of $14m is a rounding error after his other grifting. Doesn't quite compare to bouncing the stock market every other week or the $300b Iran deal or the bribe lawsuits that the media companies had to get the judge to not dismiss so they could "settle".

Imagine begging a judge to not let you win a case.

[–] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

That's exactly what I said. It's not about the money.

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

He runs in all the circles where all the money in the universe is never enough.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sika Corp. did not reply to CNN’s request for comment.

They (wisely) turned down the job, so why would they comment now? Why did CNN even ask? I’m sure that whoever made the ultimate decision to pass on Trump’s little fiasco is smiling.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

A responsible journalist would be happier if Sika agreed with the other side’s quoting of them. We currently only have the retelling of a conversation from one of the two parties. It’s a pretty credible retelling of the conversation, but we can’t be sure unless both parties agree thats how the conversation went.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 week ago

If they mean this Sika, turning it down for feasibility concerns, means it’s not feasible.

[–] tunetardis@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ironically, the only solution may be to drain the swamp and start over?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Don't stop at the reflecting pool

[–] elvith@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

No, you misheard. He never wanted to drain the swamp. The plan was to train the swamp!

load more comments
view more: next ›