this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
478 points (98.6% liked)

science

28382 readers
164 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Humans evolved to pay close attention to danger, but today that instinct is being overwhelmed by an endless supply of bad news from around the world. Researchers say the answer isn’t to stop following current events—it’s to build healthier habits around how, when, and where we get our news.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 160 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh, great… more bad news.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to read this in Marvin's voice from HHTTG

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 month ago

Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they've got me delivering bad news.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 64 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Your brain wasn't designed at all.

[–] sniggleboots@europe.pub 53 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Iteratively designed by evolution to maximize survival, I guess

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, so you could easily say we evolved to, or our brains evolved to... And so on

[–] higgsboson@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, in fact that is still teleological.

[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Is it? I’d guess 'to evolve to do smth' doesn’t necessarily need to be teleological. IIRC the verb 'evolve' means the fittest getting randomly selected, no?

I think I understand where you’re coming from but I think it’s fundamentally different to 'being designed with a specific goal in mind'

[–] oce@jlai.lu 4 points 1 month ago

Evolved into or evolved with may reduce the implication of an intention.

  • Our brains evolved into structures capable of supporting complex language.
  • Our brains evolved with the capacity for complex language.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Yeah I dunno about design as much as iterative adaptations over incomprehensibly large periods of time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Figure of speech. Perhaps "optimized" would be more accurate?

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And the people who are in charge and doing evil things know this and are using it to their advantage.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It's literally written down as part of the playbook.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] zerofk@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago (7 children)

My brain was not designed for anything. It was not designed.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

"The human mind has not adapted to this level of bad news"

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yet

I'm going to stare into the abyss until it blinks first

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 24 points 1 month ago

Don’t tell me that then, you’re just making it worse.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I'm not sure I understand what "build healthier habits around how, when and where we get our news" exactly means and how that would help. I mean if TACO drops bombs on little kids, I can't think of how digesting this differently is going to be any healthier for me.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

One thing I see a lot is the same event repackaged repeatedly with various headlines from different angles to elicit despair and outrage. If you heard about it once already, that is probably enough.

[–] Gorilladrums@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Spending an hour a day reading news from reputable sources is a lot healthier than doomscrolling questionable content for 8 hours on Reddit and Instagram.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flameleaf@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Switching from Reddit to Lemmy did wonders for my mental health. Less time doom scrolling, more time to engage with my hobbies

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I feel the opposite, my feed is almost entirely people describing how the world is falling apart, how communism is good but not that communism, and Linux

[–] specimen@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Absolutely, lemmy has such a downer vibe to it, it’s not doing me any good using this platform lately.

[–] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We need more jokes around Lemmy, this is all communism this and that gays blahblahblah trump yapyapyap, holy cow. Sometimes I can't help but doomscroll on Reddit, missing the community and the jokes and the friends I had there.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mearcfara@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Title is true even without the last two words.

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Honestly it's true with just the first 5 words.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Strider@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

I am painfully aware.

[–] TheparishofChigwell@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Isn't this the thing we are doing by being on Lemmy? My mental state is better when I scroll the feed here, as opposed to scrolling reddit.

I do both still, but I'm nearing the phase where Lemmy gets more attention.

It's just fucked that I read too much so I might run out of content on Lemmy which pushes me to read the news then back to reddit untill I wake up again

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You might take some of the time you're doomscrolling and read a silly book. Not a lot, like 30 mins.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've found my attention span destroyed now. I don't read much any more at all, it's kinda sad.

I think it's also because I work from home and a commute used to isolate me and I'd be forced to read.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] morto@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (5 children)

When you finally decide to leave reddit, remember to make some posts or comments inviting people to join lemmy

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] c64z86@piefed.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I'd argue that it was never designed for this much stimulation full stop. All the constant noise and things competing for attention all the time around you. Bad news is just the nasty icing on the cake.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a problem I struggle with philosophically. I have lived in the US with a degree of privilege and I feel the price for that should include knowing how the proverbial sausage is made, that is, knowing all the crap that is being done to allow me to live in (meager) comfort.

It's Poor Things cranked up to eleven. The British empire is holding the beer of the American one. It's just too much.

The continual rush of news, propelled by the addictive properties of the YouTube algo, have driven me quite mad, albeit, I suffer from behavioral health problems already. I haven't found a balance to this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MousePotatoDoesStuff@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've largely stopped actively following news because

  • most of it is stuff we knew already
  • I already find out all that I need to know and more involuntarily through occasional social media visits

I'd like to read summaries of a given week's news on the world, EU, national, and maybe local level once a week, tho. I'll check if there's anything like this for the world and EU scale and report back here if there is.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Our brains were not evolved for any of this. The modern world is very alien compared to the mundane life of hunter gatherers.

[–] Dreamer@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Maybe if we stopped letting bad things happen, there wouldn't be so much bad news.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I just stopped following a lot of it. Even reputable places resort to hyperbole. I switched off for my own mental health. I still know what's going on. I do not discuss it on social media.

Ultimately, to handle the fact that things are going to shit, you either choose, despair, ignorance or indifference. The last was my choice.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I find that filtering out where you get your news from, and specifically limiting how much you delve into social media discussions about it, definitely helps.

I find that reading headlines from the news wire services (AP, Reuters, etc) helps a lot in getting simple news that doesn't delve into the clickbait bullshit of other sites. That and I specifically avoid opinion pieces. I got plenty of my own opinions; I don't need some other assholes opinions too.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Its about the junkfood. News should be dry and chalky. Not only is it easier to process (rationally), you tend to just stop consuming when you feel done.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

In Soviet Russia, observing an event changes your outcomes.

[–] CentipedeFarrier@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

I find my days to be much better overall when I don't spend a lot of time online over an extended period. I’m more productive, more creative, and less anxious. I still find out all the impactful stuff, anyway.

Its not like knowing the bad news as it happens helps me in any way, genuinely, so why bother wasting all my bandwidth on it?

My dumb monkey brain is meant to tell five kinds of poisonous berries from the one edible kind. What does it do with an international pedophile ring, climate collapse, and rising inequality? Shuts down is what it does.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I use RSS now for news.

Its been so liberating. I can read offline, save articles for later, no ads or paywalls, no algorithms, no bullshit.

I highly recommend.

[–] ilillilillilillililli@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been doing the same. The issue is finding high quality feeds with full articles. Most are just a snippet of the article with a link saying "read the full story at..." (The Verge, PBS, The Guardian). Others are even worse and just link directly to the shit-laden website (Ars Technica). The best quality news feeds I've found are Techdirt and The Intercept. Would you care to share some good RSS news feeds you've found?

load more comments (2 replies)

what's your favourite rss aggravator?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BussyGyatt@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

bad news, everyone: bad news is bad for you!

load more comments
view more: next ›