this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
652 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

56586 readers
733 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 85 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

hey usa, china is building tons of high-speed rail. they're the leaders in decarbonizing their energy mix. they're building tons of housing to handle population growth. they're financing infrastructure projects in the global south. why not try beating them at all that?

no? just wars again? okay.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Chinese people own their homes too

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Even with more property rights. If you own a house and you don't want to sell it when they want to build a new highway, they build the highway surrounding your house, instead of expropriating you like in western countries.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

tbh living there in the middle of a highway would be hell

it is disappointing how despite how ahead china is in terms of public transit, they still build car-centric infrastructure like this. at least, unlike north america, shitty car-centric infrastructure is not all there is lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've never had to use the term 'Passive-Aggressive Infrastructure' before but I'm here for it and loving it

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fascinating as it may be, that's a pretty horrible picture.

Imagine living that house. It's a pretty stark demonstration of the state gets what it wants, one way or another.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It is absolutely maddening to see American pundits defend every dumbshit, ruinous, genocidal policy over the last twenty years by pointing at China and claiming, "We had to show them we were the boss".

From AI to A-bombs, there's nothing you can't get away with by insisting "China Bad! This will stop them!"

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

We are operating from a position of strength!

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago

It's a very convenient go-to excuse. And as long as the American public keeps lapping it up, those in power will keep counting on it.

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They can't admit the only reason has been "Money!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China: "Wow they're a lot less tough than we thought"

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They lost how many soldiers in that?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm not sure how many US imperial troops died, but they did lose a good amount of aircraft:

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So glad that American's voted for the "No more wars" president while hoping for a better cost of living.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The US is not a democracy, its a one-party capitalist empire, and even its controlled opposition wing wanted to go to war with Iran for a long time. The democrats under Biden also massively increased funding to Israel to help destroy palestine:

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US is basically a "this is good for bitcoin", but as a country.

Its slow, humiliating, public suicide is even more pathetic than great britain's.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

I, for one, think it's funny.

[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'd put money on China being able to pwn the USA with the click of a button. We know about salt typhoon, and there's been documented backdoors in IoT devices and some Unitree bots. Imagine all the things we don't know about. Especially regarding power generation and general aging infrastructure.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Buddy, I could tell you that based on the fact that they've lost every single war they've been in since WWII.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] fanbois@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

An open conflict between the US and china would probably end with exactly zero winners and an uninhabitable glowing piece of rock orbiting the sun. Maybe the cockroaches can then find a better path to communism.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I think Americans should ban debate clubs. Clearly they're only teaching how to create mental convolutions instead of creating sound arguments.

[–] sangeteria@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Americans should consider doing mathematical convolution instead. Very important for functional analysis with deep connections to the Laplace, and thus Fourier, transforms.

[–] subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh no, debate clubs are actually very good at teaching kids how to discern good information from bad, and how to make proper arguments with supporting evidence. Right wing media teaches gish gallop and never be wrong, it's these two ideas that have taken over discourse.

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I will have to take your word on that. Got to admit my opinion is based on a limited set of people I had the displeasure of interacting with.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 23 points 1 month ago

Literally the equivalent of a homeless libertarian laughing at well to do, middle class Chinese people because he thinks he's better off

demonstrating that the US is willing

Yes, because America is famous for the ambiguity around whether or not we'd go to war with global South nations

and able

No

In that sense, it was already won

The government can behave like a rabid dog, but China would Old Yeller America

[–] mecen@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

I thing losing $400b will greatly help to put china in its place

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

China and Iran are allies.

If the US and China go to war Iran will close the strait to their enemies. And we’ve seen the US is impotent to that and overly reliant on oil.

I think China just has to deal with a first strike from the US and then wait for an impotent United States to fall apart and starve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Whoever wrote this is an idiot.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] axx@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago

How can people be so delusional?

"When their salary depends on it" is a decent first answer.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago

Remember folks, the guy is a master of the deal

[–] Ardha@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah giving away the weakness of all our equipments iranians hurt to china is such a huge deterrant bruv

load more comments
view more: next ›