it's experimental, it's not supposed to be an actual terminal to be used (at least i don't think anyone would), the potential is future implementation of 3d rendering inside the terminal. it's a similar scenario to when kitty started to introduce images inside the terminal. is it necessary? no. but it's fun.
gary_host_laptop
joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF
is this like the second or third npm vulberability in a few months?
i would download everything i could i have one of these.
why would you be a follower of a billionaire?... that's the lame part.
i've been considering trying to start using vim recently, but now i don't know really, are they too different to learn to use? i'd love to spend time on something i'll end up using for years hopefully
edit: i received a mod report from this post, i just now found out it's a 3 year old post, sorry
it's not that cia agents sound like liberals, but rather that liberals sound like cia agents. liberal parrot these points because it's what's been propagated through psyops to promote the us rhetoric. i made this kind of like a meme, it's worth keeping in mind but i'm not saying to use this orthodoxically to 100% confirm they are a fed.
im not saying we should set up a bot, just that the arguments are so repetitive that they end up being formulaic.
i guess maybe they realized that they couldn't do much psyops here so they're focusing on liberal instances. i might be losing my mind but i can't think of piefed as anything but a psyop.
it makes sense, i actually was inspired by your post, and tried to compile what's essentially the very tiring and repeated arguments they use and ended up writing this. i honestly believe you could wire up a bot to reply to them, because there's literally so few "arguments" that could be debunked with a parenti quote.
one thing i noted from your post is that you've mentioned high post to comment ratio, but you didn't mention numbers and in my experience there are probably 2 groups, one that only want to post propaganda to get upvotes and the other that focuses on spreading imperialism in the comment section.
i dont disagree, but if you don't mention stuff like threat model to n00bs they end up thinking they need to only communicate telepathically in order to not get spied on. every attack is possible, just not for every threat model, for example a very sophisticated js attack wouldnt be used on the wild, but more likely targetted on a specific individual because once it's known it's fixed and you can't use it. it's worthy so you use it on a worthy individual.
instance-level signals
- brand new account with no post history outside political threads
- account from a known bad-faith/large general purpose instance (lemmy.world etc) that only ever shows up in communist/.ml communities
content signals
- "both sides" framing but applied asymmetrically, equating us imperialism with defensive responses from targeted states
- humanitarian interventionism: "but what about the people of x" used specifically to justify nato/us positions
- treats western ngos and media as neutral baseline, demands extraordinary evidence for any counter-narrative
- whataboutism that only ever runs one direction, deflects from western atrocities but never from the targets of western aggression
- "im a leftist but..." followed by a position you could copy paste from a state dept briefing
- disproportionate focus on us adversaries (china, russia, cuba, dprk, venezuela, iran) with zero comparable scrutiny of us allies
- concern trolling about "authoritarianism" that somehow only ever applies to socialist states
behavioral signals
- posts consistently during us business hours
- only shows up when a specific topic is active, disappears otherwise
- never updates their position no matter what evidence you put in front of them, the argument is purely performative
- high comment to post, or post to comment ratio, always replying never posting, reactive disruption pattern
- posts are concentrated in the same few communities, often with overlap between suspected accounts suggesting coordinated targeting
i think the image size limit has been reduced some time ago, because of this i've encountered various situations where i had to manually compress images to be able to upload them. i think the size limit is at around 800kb, at least based on my experience. is there a way that images could be compress upon upload to avoid this? i genuiley rather have them look like a blurry mess than to have to edit them manually.
https://github.com/gary-host-laptop/ushiro https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/%E5%BE%8C%E3%82%8D-ushiro/
Every image a website doesn't want you to have is still there โ just gated. Ushiro drops you behind the scenes to find it. Background images, clickable decoys, alternative resolutions, inline SVGs, base64 chunks, shadow DOM. If it rendered on your screen, you can take it.
I forked behind! extension and added a little extra touch, plus some improvements
view more: next โบ
daddy why did you ate my fries