this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
649 points (99.4% liked)

Memes

56052 readers
257 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I'd put money on China being able to pwn the USA with the click of a button. We know about salt typhoon, and there's been documented backdoors in IoT devices and some Unitree bots. Imagine all the things we don't know about. Especially regarding power generation and general aging infrastructure.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Buddy, I could tell you that based on the fact that they've lost every single war they've been in since WWII.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al -4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Tell that to Saddam and Gaddafi.

lol the downvote. Did those governments that no longer exist actually win the wars that caused them to cease existing?

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No, but the resulting insurgency forced America out in retreat? Do you think America won't he Iraq war lmao?

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

1st Iraq was a clear win, both militarily and strategically. 2nd Iraq and Libya were strategic victories because the real purpose was to maintain the petrodollar, which was attained.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Actually the reason your government gave was to get the weapons of mass destruction from Saddam, which was proven to be a lie, so how did you win an illegal war based on fake goals?

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

You believe US when they state the war reasons and goals? Lol, lmao even. They achieved a real war goal of stopping Iraq and Libya from breaking dollar monopoly on oil sale.

Also it's not my government, my government was actually quite honest, they admitted they went there to bootlick USA and loot Iraq.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Uhh no, I'm saying they didn't win the war because they couldn't meet their stated goals, I wouldn't trust that country as far as I could throw it.

My bad for assuming, btw.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Uhh no, I’m saying they didn’t win the war because they couldn’t meet their stated goals

I mean yeah that usually work like that but USA are in entire another layer of hypocrisy, their stated war goald are only a political theatre for their population, plausible deniality and propaganda purposes.

My bad for assuming, btw.

No problem

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 days ago

Have a good weekend, mate!

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Do you think Saddam's government won? The US won the war with Iraq if not the war with the insurgency.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think nobody won, but the US especially didn't win.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Ok so you can't win a war if it wasn't clean and easy? And since when has the publicly stated justification for a war ever had anything to do with who won? Lots of wars start with false justifications.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Show me a reputable source that claims the US won the war. The 20 year war, of a superpower, VS a small middle eastern country.

[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

20 years? The US ousted the ba'athist government in less than a month and installed a sympathetic regime in less than two years. Even a pyrrhic victory is still a victory. The US got what it wanted geopolitically and the government they waged war against was ousted. That's a victory.

It was costly, unjustified, evil, and probably not even worth it from the cold math of empire but it was still a military victory.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] spacesatan@lazysoci.al 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh ok I guess nobody has ever won a war because war is bad and even the winners take casualties. Very strong arguments you've presented of 'no lol', acting smug, and having your own bespoke definition of winning a war.

[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Lmao. You sound mad, bud. Despite what natopedia says about the war, it was a resounding loss.

[–] fanbois@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

An open conflict between the US and china would probably end with exactly zero winners and an uninhabitable glowing piece of rock orbiting the sun. Maybe the cockroaches can then find a better path to communism.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I feel like nukes are more just showpieces than item that anyone actually considers using.

[–] whosarlindo235@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Japan used to think that too

Honestly i don't think you are completely wrong. Most of the reason for having massive nuclear weapon inventory comes as a mean to dissuasion. However that doesn't necessarily mean they will never be used, just suggests it would not be like the apocalyptic war everyone thinks.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

If Japan did think that, they thought it before several other countries in the world had nukes. Even capitalist countries have the ability to see that if they send nukes then they will be receiving nukes back to destroy them in about a few hours.

[–] Tabitha@hexbear.net 5 points 5 days ago

probably depends on whose soil it's on and whether or not it's a proxy war and/or world war.