this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
499 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

85804 readers
3069 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 135 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

Ah yes, Cortana and Copilot both suck, but surely third time's the charm. And when Scout is, inevitably, unpopular as well? We'll see what they call number four.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 52 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

You forgot clippy, but everyone forgets about clippy unless it's in this exact context. Or it's Norfolk wizard game.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago

I can't believe I forgot Clippy...

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is there any fundamental difference between Copilot and Scout, or is it just a straight up rebranding?

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My impression is that scout is specifically going to be an agentic ai. Agentic ai platforms are supposedly a little more competent than chatbots, but still subject to the same llm chicanery and enormous energy usage.

It's hard to compare against copilot because MS has called a ton of distinct things copilot (see the diagram below).

diagram of different MS products called copilot

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

You forgot they called it Bing in the middle too

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Cortana was actually really good on Windows Phone but they dumbed it down and added all sort of crap to it by the time it was integrated onto the desktop. They could've doubled down on whatads it good but nope.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 80 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think you mean to say: "microslop can slop off"

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Neon_Carnivore@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AntY@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is what happens when bots train on each other's comments

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 53 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

do you really wanna be admitting that addiction is your goal?

A $6 Million Jury Verdict Ruled Social Media Is Addictive.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/anishasircar/2026/03/30/a-6-million-jury-verdict-ruled-social-media-is-addictive-now-what/

[–] uninvitedguest@piefed.ca 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That kind of fine is a pittance.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

true. but this one wasn't a class action, either.. just one plaintiff.

[–] stretch2m@infosec.pub 47 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I will never EVER give an AI agency over any of my personal accounts.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You are not the target audience.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 35 points 3 weeks ago

Oh we're the target, just not the customer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] magnue@lemmy.world 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Instead they made me addicted to Linux.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Yeah every time I get on my laptop it's a little more unrecognisable and unusable to me. Will be getting in Linux as soon as I get a chance.

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 8 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

What’s stopping you so far?

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Time more than anything, im only on it about 2 hours once a month

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kablez@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My non Linux savvy spouse is currently dual booting Linux Mint because Windows has become so frustrating to use.

Mint isn't perfect. We've run into a few bugs and shortcomings. But there's a big difference between dealing with genuine issues in an OS and using one that feels actively hostile and designed to exploit the user.

If both experiences can be frustrating, why choose the one that's frustrating by design (unless you absolutely have to) ?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

I've used Linux for a decade now and windows is so much more buggy and shortcoming. Including new bugs.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gotta produce dopamine for that to happen. Not cortisol.

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah but one day they will hack it, like every form of advertising and addiction that was pushed on us since tobacco. This is just a new frontier that is unknown right now, like explaining the ridiculous idea of future social media addiction to a user in 2005.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

adding new "features"

look inside

enshittification

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 16 points 3 weeks ago

We're going to MAKE people ADDICTED by ~~making a REALLY Good Product!~~ ~~SOLVING annoying Problems!~~ ~~TREATING Customers respectfully!~~ FORCING ourselves Onto people like Donald Trump on Little Girls!

[–] flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Did they try making it good?

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 11 points 3 weeks ago

That's the beauty of it (from their viewpoint), they don't have to make it good, just unavoidable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, we know

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 3 weeks ago

Have they tried making it better, I feel like I'm more likely to become addicted to it if it was good.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If they want people addicted to an AI, it's going to have to be a lot better than fucking Copilot.

As slop generators go, it's about the sloppiest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

Duh. I wouldn't have called it "addiction", but dependency was clearly the goal, otherwise they wouldn't take away classical search.

I thought that was obvious from the start.

Hahahaha suck it, Microslop. I look forward to your Chapter 11 filing.

[–] Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml 12 points 3 weeks ago

Create a captive audience through monopoly or near monopoly on a given market, then charge them more for a worse version of the product, reducing costs and maximizing profits, it's always been the goal with corporate capitalism, look at the whole Copilot and GitHub situation right now.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This strategy worked so well for Bing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

No shit, Sherlock.
And people would actually happily get addicted to an AI assistant which is reliable, safe, capable, kind, and fast.
They really should try making a great product. Then they don't need any tricks. People love great products.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

I can't fault them for this business plan. It has worked for the opioid business professionals time and time again, for centuries!

[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Oh they're making me addicted alright. I can't stop installing Linux on things. Its like a new vice for my devices

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Hold on let me put on my surprised look

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

BREAKING - Companies want customers to get addicted to their products!!!1

[–] Qzr@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

At least they're honest (internally) about their intentions. Obviously this is also the goal of the other big AI foundries; it either already is or it will be in the future.

Luckily Microsoft is famously bad at this, but Google and perhaps OpenAI will be more successful. We're still in the subsidized honeymoon phase, but this window is closing with the increasing pressure to return profit.

As a skeptic, I'm not worried about myself, but I'm scared for the people who will get addicted and then ruined by full prices or devastated when their mind drug is taken away again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

Explains why they want you to think it's also a person.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

That shit should set off alarm bells of all regulators… but we elect people who don’t give a fuck so…

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 6 points 3 weeks ago

Legitimately most modern games or all of social media.

[–] FE80@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only Scout believed in himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›