this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
139 points (96.0% liked)

World News

57576 readers
1078 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 60 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Who could have ever foreseen this result when we outsourced all of our manufacturing and skilled labour to China???

It's almost like chasing thoughtless, short-term profit gains is a horrible idea.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Our design engineering is lacking too. I read not long ago how the president of Ford said how they tore down a Chinese EV and said “we got it all wrong.” I’m in the automotive manufacturing industry and we source some parts from China. The factories I work with are all IATF/ISO certified and they can make parts for 10x less AND not require a minimum production that would last me 5 years. And the comment about working around the tariff is absolutely true. One of our Chinese suppliers started building a plant in Thailand not long after the election. State of the art. less tariff. Quality parts. My first order is shipping this week.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Chinese industry knows how to manufacture at scale. With a hundred year head start, US auto manufacturing is still a joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 38 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The world's car makers struggled to compete with Japan back in the '70s, but I would argue that struggle gave people access to better vehicles.

Turned out the winning move was to make affordable cars that were fuel efficient to operate and people would rush to buy them.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Japan even failed to learn from Japan judging by everything I see here. Not necessarily as badly as the US mfgs did, but still. Especially for those chasing hydrogen right now and Nissan going through its thing (and I drive a Nissan kei car).

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Nissan/Honda/Toyota/Subaru have the worst EVs on the market. They learned nothing lol.

Bad screens, tiny screens, bad software, uncompetitive range, bad interior, zero competitive features above the competition.

Japan is an insular society that discourages talking out against your superiors in the work environment, so this was bound to happen in the days of the aging-out boomers holding onto leadership positions. With the head start that Japan had, they should’ve produced a 1:1 Tesla in 5 years, but they didn’t. It’s been 15 years since the best cars hit the market, and now China leapfrogged Tesla to be the best like Japan did to American car makers 40 years ago.

All of this was made possible by Chinese government cash infusions and social programs to invest in car manufacturing/ecosystems. The west did that in 2010, but let the companies spend the money how they wanted (the top executives were allowed to get away with embezzling all of it. surprise!) with no stipulations, and that’s how we got to where we are today.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

But that requires R&D, and that means hiring and paying more engineers! And maintaining multiple production lines! And paying people to work on those! Can't we just make a law that all Americans have to buy an F-150 by the time they turn 30???

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

I mean, from what I can see half of them aren't even trying.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Alternate headline: "The World's Carmakers Have Become Too Fat And Bloated To Compete With China".

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This is my take too.

It's not that America and Europe can't compete. It's that they've got their fat asses propped up on piles of misbegotten cash and are too fucking lazy and greedy to make a good product.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

I wonder if the fact that most American and European carmakers are stubbornly clinging to the 1800s technology known as the internal combustion engine while Chinese ones are actively embracing the modern technology that car buyers actually want has anything to do with it 🤔

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What? Rubbish. Total incomprehensible rubbish.
Right, time to get the coal burning in my steam tractor!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

It probably has more to do with the cost of labour in China.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (15 children)

That's another part of it, sure, but DEFINITELY not the whole or even main reason.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] agelord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

And also the fact that they control all the resources (like rare earth minerals) needed to make EV batteries while every other manufacturer is forced to buy them at a markup from China. They even have their own slave labor force to work the mines so that they can keep prices low for themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TuringCompleteSocialist@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Then don't. Make cities walkable and invest in public transport.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago

China is also doing that, believe it or not.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

In my experience, the best we can do is change the bus schedules so you have to walk further to a bus stop and wait longer for a bus that never arrives at the scheduled time...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

They go for next quarter profits instead of value for consumers . Stopped building affordable cars favoring trucks. Shipped car industry to China. The end

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Went for trucks for greater profit margin and lower regulations but lost the volume game. For capitalists, they sure suck at it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Even if you ignore the US obsession with trucks, western manufacturers labour costs are much higher and there aren't subsidies on manufacturing EVs, only buying them. Chinese EVs get manufacturing subsidies and then in many countries they also get a local subsidy at the point of purchase. It's an underhanded tactic, the Chinese government is essentially paying people outside of China to buy Chinese EVs so western competiton would die.

[–] Grumpus_Maximus@thelemmy.club 7 points 2 months ago (14 children)

they have all the manufacturing there, I'm sure all the parts are dirt cheap for them if you don't ship em cross ocean.

I'm not sure about china paying for you to buy them, many countries counter that with tariffs. I think those prices are close to natural prices given the enormous scale of china and nearby markets.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

US car makers get tax incentives and bailouts, effectively subsidized by the government as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It’s an underhanded tactic

It’s a normal tactic

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago

Maybe they should try practical and repairaible cars for a change?

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Think U.S. car manufacturers did a couple billion of of stock buybacks over the last few years. If only they had invested that money back into the business to make better vehicles.

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Short term profit and doing compliance cars and half assed attempts with certain irrelevance in a decade or so, or choosing to forgo profit and really go for converting to EV.

Every board room figuring a golden parachute in 10 years sounds really good.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

You mean China has a comparative advantage? Maybe the West should make more port instead.

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They don't even need cars to do it. The BBSHD kit from Bafang I'm gonna throw on the bike I'm building will save me thousands of miles on my existing car.

China is keeping me from buying a new car by helping not need to use one.

  1. Lobby to become the default mode of transportation in the postwar period
  2. Get dragged kicking and screaming towards efficiency
  3. Successfully lobby to gut regulations and manufacture demand for SUVs and crew cab pickups
  4. Stop building cars altogether
  5. Help get a fascist elected who kicks off another oil crisis
  6. Cry about China eating your lunch
[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

For years it was all about cheap labour in China but what it really is about is innovation and robots. Western car makers have largely missed the warnings by assuming the Chinese market was like our own.

The other point is that capitalism has been whinging about market distortion while the Chinese government was planning for dominance.

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

China funds all these companies and their projects, that's why China is pushing forward.

[–] Peck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

So like you think us and Europe not prepping their manufacturing by combination of loans and tax breaks?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago

Good, maybe it'll stir them from their oligopolist stupor.

The days of fat, dumb and happy are gone. The options are to get tough or to get driven out of business.

load more comments
view more: next ›