this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
164 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

84731 readers
3124 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

"You'll eventually give in" Tells you everything you need to know about the power of large tech companies in the US .

We have the money and the power to force this technology in to the mainstream. Tech companies know that Congress is way too old, way too corrupt, and way too slow to really do anything about regulating stuff like this in a reasonable time frame. They have no real barriers and the heads of these companies don't give a shit about the user as long as they pay their monthly subscription.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It's not like we don't know the playbook already.

https://www.androidauthority.com/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement-3664806/

Now you know brain implants will be used as an authentication system, to protect the children, prevent spam, and maybe they'll manage to add something about terrorism in the justification.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

And your employment history, financial status, known associates, voter record, you get the idea.

[–] jobbies@lemmy.zip 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

knows you'll give in eventually

No, I bloody will not.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I resisted mobile phones until about 1999, and didn't get a "smartphone" until 2014. I was quite the Luddite.

[–] SaneMartigan@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I still don't play mobile games. I thought it was going to be a great opportunity but all the games sucked and I didn't like the interface.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 15 hours ago

I run hot and cold... I liked the BTD series for a while - it has a good phone interface IMO as well as "easy to multitask" play, unlike something like StarCraft that sucks you in and demands 110% of your attention. However, I haven't played it in years, I was just tempted to reload it tonight, and I did, and... it just doesn't do anything for me anymore.

[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I don't trust these ghouls to pour me a glass of water, they won't get anywhere near my body

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 2 points 20 hours ago

So creeps like Zuck can upload their LLM conscience into my brain? No thank you.

... Actually, that would make a great horror movie.

[–] bilgamesch@feddit.org 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

could we just like - tactically nuke them?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 22 hours ago

No need, at least not for several decades. The tech described in the article is millions of times more capable than current working experimental systems. Possible future? yes. Possible within 100 years? maybe. Kind of on the order of a self-sufficient expanding Mars colony of human settlers.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 3 points 23 hours ago

I will never ever.. hahaha okay you rascal, ya got me! Now get over here and stick that junk in my head-meat haha

[–] Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

The choice between the chip and a bullet?

Dont expect everyone to sit idly by for either option.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

We will all carry our "papers" around in our bodies.

[–] Archr@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can't wait for adverts for the ass blaster 9000® to be beamed directly into my frontal lobe without my consent.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 22 hours ago

If they can blast in the ads, the need for physical toys pretty much goes away...

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

I'd take it

[–] Zink@programming.dev 12 points 1 day ago

Another tech headline, another thing that would have sounded pretty cool 20-30 years ago but today sounds like an absolute nightmare to stay FAR away from. And this one more than most!

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only way I would ever even consider this is if the firmware was open source and the software to interact with it was open source and it had no direct connection to any sort of network at all and required an external device that I could turn off or on to connect to it an external network. Oh, and the hardware would need to be open source as well.

[–] KillerWhale@orcas.enjoying.yachts 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It will be proprietary and cloud based, when you skip a payment you collapse on the floor until a family member signs up for extended warranty.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

I wouldn't trust these assholes with a rabid viper let alone my own brain

[–] prex@aussie.zone 97 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A report in Politico details a TED talk in Vancouver last month

Oh so it's just rambling musings of some self-important CEO rather than any actual declaration of intent.

There are some good TED talks but a lot of them are just hot air.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 78 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Over my dead body.

Also, this is laughable:

We’re on the cusp of the next major transition, the merger of humans and AI.

These guys don't even have true AI yet, just a text predictor on steroids that frequently hallucinates and gets things wrong.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago

High on their own supply. Common human weakness, fuck I wish it weren't.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The cope is really deep in the tech sector. Way too many imbeciles who think they're geniuses and too much VC to throw around.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’ve been evangelising for smart glasses for years. But even if they get the functionality I’ve been hoping for I’m still not going to get them, because i don’t want every woman i meet to think I’m secretly recording her tits

There’s no way I’m letting Elon musk do brain surgery on me to harvest my thoughts

[–] Zacryon@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People forget about the other genders when it comes to the issues with smart glasses. And kids. Where is the "for the safety of our children" mob, when we need one?

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Where is the "for the safety of our children" mob, when we need one?

Busy being weaponized against minorities again

[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

What functionality are you looking for? Most I can think of is gimmicky at best.

Would be interested even in gimmicky use cases.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

My hard of hearing ass wants subtitles

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, plenty of what i want is gimmicky. GIVE ME A HUD!

But i can think of things like overlaying arrows on the environment when getting walking directions, setting reminders by seeing things/people, being able to fully view 3d objects when doing things like identifying something (say a flower you’ve seen) by image

[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah this usual stuff would be nice but the trade off with privacy and surveillance is not worth the risk IMO. :(

I want a health bar.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, as i say - i love the idea. The practical reality, at least so far, is shit. And i don’t see any way for it to get better rather than worse

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

That's a hell of a faustian bargain, good luck with that.

[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 50 points 2 days ago (5 children)

AI CEO D. Scott Phoenix laid out a vision of a world in which the chipped enjoy so many advantages of the unchipped that you’ll be forced to comply.

I won't even verify my age online. He can shove my advantageous chip right up his ass.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] valar@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

No, I don't think I will

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (6 children)

So many people are already functionally hooked up, even if it is happening through their eyes and not a direct wire. Prove me wrong, everybody: don’t touch any of your devices for a week. It’s nigh unthinkable now but I remember times when the internet didn’t exist, cell phones didn’t exist, I had no cable TV, no game console, and would only turn on my little black and white Mac to write a paper for school. We listened to music a lot, socialized in person, smoked a lot of… various things, had a lot of sex. It’s a rather poor trade we’ve made if you ask me.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 22 hours ago

There are people with functioning brain implants helping the blind to see, the deaf to hear, etc.

They don't work nearly as well as the evolutionary naturally grown versions, they have some nasty technical problems, but they do work after a fashion.

The underlying assumption is "exponentially growing scientific knowledge and technical capability" will turn these dreams real - and it will, for some very small subset of what is being dreamed. I don't think a practical "everybody gets one" smartphone in the brain is coming in the next 100 years, but who knows?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kommeavsted@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

We could be granting everyone in the world a high standard of living but instead we're going to charge them to self-induce early onset neurodegenerative disease.

load more comments
view more: next ›