Well, when the question is: why isn't my server access working, and the result from gpt gets their server access working... I hope you can trust a result like that?
MangoCats
It's not that I don't know, it's that I've already answered their questions, in writing, if they would just read a half page of text and do what it says.
I get questions like: why can't I access this server, I followed the wiki page (first clue, they didn't follow the wiki page). That's not asking for insight, that's asking for where they failed to follow a set of 5 step directions by doing things like: changing the default filename of their new ssh key to something they invented.
GPT explained, far more patiently than I would have, how indeed to do 4 more steps and rename your ssh key to anything you want, but I did offer the insight: if you just leave the name as the default value, you can skip all of this extra work.
They're really good at digging for stuff, like: this app is reporting the git hash it was built from - somewhere in the log files - go read that and show me which branch that hash appears on (hash is 8 commits back in some branch...) Yeah, I could do that myself, but why would I if I don't have to?
Increasingly, people ask me questions, send me screen shots, I copy-paste that into gpt, gpt's answers are helpful and correct... they have access to the same (free to use) gpt themselves...
grab a router and install OpenWRT onto it, and turn it into a wireless bridge. Use the router to connect to the office WiFi, and have a wired connection to your laptop
A setup like that would trip our IT security. I actually killed all the phones on our floor by doing a simple packet route they didn't recognize, they have the routers set to kill all the PoE and block all data when anything they don't recognize comes through.
I miss the days when the SEO bots weren't winning.
The ruling is flawed, searching the Internet has been an "AI" battle for 20 years using the predecessors of LLMs to sort out "what people really want" vs the websites that are precision honed to receive as many top-ranking search result returns as possible. Then, of course, Google forgot the n't in "At least don't be Evil." and they started pushing promoted (aka paying customers') results higher in the rankings.
If you simply unplug Gemini, what replaces it? Is Hadoop "too smart" for the ruling? Multiple cross references of content and links and what all else proprietary algorithms the Google goblins cooked up over the last 20 years, at what point is that AI/not AI? If Gemini gets repackaged as "totally not AI tech" - does that make it now legal?
People do need to curb their enthusiasm, on both sides of the AI questions. It's a tool, it's not perfect for everything, it is good for some things, better than the best of what came before - for some things.
And the children over 65 clearly don't take any shit from City Hall.
remind yourself of things you already know (what was the command for X again)
Speak for yourself, they remind me of things I used to know. I have reached a point where I feel like I have forgotten more than most people know.
This isn't new since ChatGPT and friends dropped. For years before that, Google search results did limited interpretation of natural language requests, not just keyword match frequency. The SEO arms race drove a different kind of AI in search fetching for at least a decade before natural language chatbot tech hit the scene.
I don't know how much is intentional enshittification to make AI results look better vs how much is simple neglect of the SEO arms race vs maybe it's genuinely getting harder to deliver good simple search results with LLMs acting as SEO agents?
What I do know is: "AI Mode" delivers more useful information than the old style page link list does these days. The pages linked from the AI Mode results tend to be relevant and useful more than the top page of page links. Hallucinations are way down from where they were 2+ years ago, even better than "top results" misses used to be, IMO. If you're not getting enough sources in your first AI mode response, ask for more - it delivers.
As was true since the first days of the internet: trust nothing. This is random junk people stick on the web for their own purposes, you have been warned.
What the kids themselves are saying, or what they're actually doing?
Self-reported behavior among teenagers is... inaccurate at best.