MangoCats

joined 2 years ago
[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I worked in industry for 12 years at market rates after getting my MS degree. In years 10-12 we hired post-docs to do some fancy lab work and publish findings - I could do that work but I was focused on other concerns. Welp, thanks to 9-11 those other concerns lost their funding, but the lab work continued. I inquired about possibly serving as the next lab-tech... those post docs were being paid less than 1/3 what I was making at industry rates. They were still getting around mostly on their bicycles, catching rides with other people when needed, and they had pretty much as many years of study and lab experience after getting their MS as I did industry experience, they just chose to continue on the PhD and Post-doctoral track for some reason... maybe they really like bicycles?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago

In the 80s it was "market rate." In engineering my TA position paid $14k a year + free tuition. The money was a little less than half of what I could earn in industry at the time, but free tuition (and an actual job offer instead of an open-ended job hunt) made it attractive enough to keep me around for a Master's degree. They offered me a PhD, with a raise to $18k/yr for the TA-ship, again right at 1/2 of what my MS was worth on the open market - I had had enough of academia, no thanks. Only took 6 weeks to find a "real" job.

Over in the business school, they had a lot more students competing for the TA positions, over there they paid $4k per year + free tuition. Seems that more business students come from families where their expenses continue to be paid by family through 6+ years of college.

I co-taught a lab with one other TA vs about 15 students, and we helped grade papers for the lecture class... could we have been replaced with AI? Maybe, but would AI stand over your shoulder and ask you "what happens when I pull this wire out of your breadboard?" then talk you through the reasons why your quick and dirty design may work in the lab, but it doesn't meet design specifications and will likely fail in real-world use where it's used millions of times a minute for years instead of 3 or 4 times for a bench test - pulling that wire is the same as your design being completely incorrect, and yet: your bench tests are all still passing... think about that.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

saying one thing and doing another

Such has been the nature of diplomacy for the past many centuries.

What's different for 6 years, and especially the past 2-ish, is they have been saying all the things - true things, false things, but most out of character for the country - but not the clown: the things that "just weren't said" in the past.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

We're almost up to 6 years of practice on the consistent inconsistency.... how do you know they're lying? Well, you don't, because about 5% of what they say turns out to be true-ish sooner or later and it's all very random sounding - see, that's the genius - nobody can predict what's coming next.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 7 hours ago

I was going more for the absurdity of a single person emitting more CO2 than a township of 150,000 people, plus the underutilization / hoarding of this imaginary construct: money by the people who have more than they need - as you allude to.

I also agree: the price of things does frequently correlate with CO2 emitted. Even when you hire someone for a service that emits virtually no CO2, what do they do with that money? Turn around and spend it on things that do emit CO2. Much of the cost of goods has to do with the cost of the energy required to produce and deliver the good (again cost correlating with CO2 emissions).

The only "industry" I can think of that moves significant money around without generating CO2 directly is finance, though when the money quits running through finance's internal spin-cycle and finally hits the real world, it's again purchasing the relase of CO2.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 8 hours ago

Is it really unemployment if nobody is there counting the unemployed?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Knew a guy who was sentenced by a judge to be a "trustee" at a prison, he was quick to point out he was never a (normal) inmate, trustees work within the prison, not as guards, for no pay - they do things that some non-inmate employees get paid to do. Depending on the situation, it might be a small transition from employee to trustee - but I highly suspect that whatever the employee did to be sentenced as an inmate would best be handled with him as an inmate (which trustees technically are) at a different prison.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 4 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

So, is it easier to change the behavior of 3500 people who can do whatever they want, 340 million people most of whom have some choices in their lifestyle, or 1.4 billion people of whom about half are just doing what it takes to survive?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 9 hours ago

To switch from Claude to Kimi in service forms available to me would be a 5x price increase for how I use Claude (milking the subscription 7 day token limit dry after 5 days pretty consistently.) Decent self-hosting solutions seem to be running around $20K+ in capital equipment and more than $20 per month in electricity costs alone.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

laws against trying to build biological weapons in your basement. That has worked pretty damn well.

Did it? And I suppose laws against dosing municipal water supplies with LSD and similar are the reason that hasn't happened yet too?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 9 hours ago

But Indian citizens, on average, can't afford as much energy expenditure.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (8 children)

The US has been cutting per capita emissions for 20 years, while China is still increasing.

But they haven't caught US yet!

United States: The average American emits roughly 14 to 15 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.

China: The average Chinese citizen emits about 8.7 to 9.2 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.

Next question: what's the average CO2 emission per capita of Billionaires?

A billionaire’s total average carbon footprint is roughly 1.9 million to 3 million metric tons of (CO_{2}) equivalent ((CO_{2}e)) per year.

So, Billionaire's income ratio is around 500,000:1 of an average US citizen, but their CO2 emissions are only about 170,000x - that makes Billionaires almost 3x greener with their greenbacks than an SUV commuting wage slave.

 

Not just water, but also resources: electricity, RAM and Flash memory, other things being over-consumed by the AI development explosion. This war doesn't have geographic or national boundaries, its the (heavily funded) AI companies vs everyone else.

 

What is this recurring connection between big missiles sending men to the moon and the military industrial complex sending expeditionary forces overseas?

 

996: 9 a.m. to 9 p.m., 6 days a week

Sure, they're burnt out, sluggish, surly, but... they're present. And when they're present, they're not out in the world spending their income. They don't need an expensive apartment or house, all they do there is sleep. Why have a fancy car when all you do is drive to/from your shitty job in it? Family? Who would have children with somebody who works such a schedule?

Even if you got more productivity from the same workers on a 9 a.m. to 3 p.m., 4 days a week schedule, you'd have to pay them more, not just per hour but overall, because they'd be out spending money on those afternoons / evenings and 3 days a week they have off. Organizing, demanding better healthcare, dental, more paid time off for vacations, and higher total wages to support all these "needs" they invent for themselves on their time off.

Keep 'em locked down, keep 'em tasked with ... anything, doesn't matter if it's productive or not, as long as it keeps them on-the-job and not spending their pay.

Edit: apparently this isn't clear: 996 is a horrible idea from all perspectives, it's bad for the workers and bad for their employers overall. But, in certain twisted views, it would be a bit like military service where the (bulk of the) workers get a pitifully small paycheck, but they don't have any real expenses so they have the option to save it all. 996 would turn that more into a wage-slave implementation where the pitifully small paycheck is just enough to meet their pitifully small expenses. In the China tech sector where they have implemented this (it is now illegal, but still practiced) they also do things like install anti-suicide nets in the stairwells of the highrises the workers work and sleep in.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/31879711

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20187958

A prominent computer scientist who has spent 20 years publishing academic papers on cryptography, privacy, and cybersecurity has gone incommunicado, had his professor profile, email account, and phone number removed by his employer Indiana University, and had his homes raided by the FBI. No one knows why.

Xiaofeng Wang has a long list of prestigious titles. He was the associate dean for research at Indiana University's Luddy School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, a fellow at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a tenured professor at Indiana University at Bloomington. According to his employer, he has served as principal investigator on research projects totaling nearly $23 million over his 21 years there.

He has also co-authored scores of academic papers on a diverse range of research fields, including cryptography, systems security, and data privacy, including the protection of human genomic data. I have personally spoken to him on three occasions for articles herehere, and here.

"None of this is in any way normal"

In recent weeks, Wang's email account, phone number, and profile page at the Luddy School were quietly erased by his employer. Over the same time, Indiana University also removed a profile for his wife, Nianli Ma, who was listed as a Lead Systems Analyst and Programmer at the university's Library Technologies division.

According to the Herald-Times in Bloomington, a small fleet of unmarked cars driven by government agents descended on the Bloomington home of Wang and Ma on Friday. They spent most of the day going in and out of the house and occasionally transferred boxes from their vehicles. TV station WTHR, meanwhile, reported that a second home owned by Wang and Ma and located in Carmel, Indiana, was also searched. The station said that both a resident and an attorney for the resident were on scene during at least part of the search.

Attempts to locate Wang and Ma have so far been unsuccessful. An Indiana University spokesman didn't answer emailed questions asking if the couple was still employed by the university and why their profile pages, email addresses and phone numbers had been removed. The spokesman provided the contact information for a spokeswoman at the FBI's field office in Indianapolis. In an email, the spokeswoman wrote: "The FBI conducted court authorized law enforcement activity at homes in Bloomington and Carmel Friday. We have no further comment at this time."

Searches of federal court dockets turned up no documents related to Wang, Ma, or any searches of their residences. The FBI spokeswoman didn't answer questions seeking which US district court issued the warrant and when, and whether either Wang or Ma is being detained by authorities. Justice Department representatives didn't return an email seeking the same information. An email sent to a personal email address belonging to Wang went unanswered at the time this post went live. Their resident status (e.g. US citizens or green card holders) is currently unknown.

Fellow researchers took to social media over the weekend to register their concern over the series of events.

"None of this is in any way normal," Matthew Green, a professor specializing in cryptography at Johns Hopkins University, wrote on Mastodon. He continued: "Has anyone been in contact? I hear he’s been missing for two weeks and his students can’t reach him. How does this not get noticed for two weeks???"

In the same thread, Matt Blaze, a McDevitt Professor of Computer Science and Law at Georgetown University said: "It's hard to imagine what reason there could be for the university to scrub its website as if he never worked there. And while there's a process for removing tenured faculty, it takes more than an afternoon to do it."

Local news outlets reported the agents spent several hours moving boxes in an out of the residences. WTHR provided the following details about the raid on the Carmel home:

Neighbors say the agents announced "FBI, come out!" over a megaphone.

A woman came out of the house holding a phone. A video from a neighbor shows an agent taking that phone from her. She was then questioned in the driveway before agents began searching the home, collecting evidence and taking photos.

A car was pulled out of the garage slightly to allow investigators to access the attic.

The woman left the house before 13News arrived. She returned just after noon accompanied by a lawyer. The group of ten or so investigators left a few minutes later.

The FBI would not say what they were looking for or who is under investigation. A bureau spokesperson issued a statement: “I can confirm we conducted court-authorized activity at the address in Carmel today. We have no further comment at this time.”

Investigators were at the house for about four hours before leaving with several boxes of evidence. 13News rang the doorbell when the agents were gone. A lawyer representing the family who answered the door told us they're not sure yet what the investigation is about.

This post will be updated if new details become available. Anyone with first-hand knowledge of events involving Wang, Ma, or the investigation into either is encouraged to contact me, preferably over Signal at DanArs.82. The email address is: dan.goodin@arstechnica.com.

view more: next ›