A dedicated server that gets anywhere close to "frontier model" performance is still about 100x as expensive and power hungry as an average home PC.
MangoCats
The load characteristics aren’t conducive to parallelization.
Not on tiny nodes separated by tiny fiber pipes... as I said elsewhere: a $100K node sucking down $1500/month in electricity could start to serve some useful loads, and provide all the hot water you could ever need.
If they would just install $100K compute nodes in every home, that should be enough local high bandwidth to do the job. It will also run about $1000-$1500 per month in electricity costs, but, hey, it's about time to upgrade that grid to be able to quick charge EVs whenever we want, too, isn't it? You might even try using the compute node to make hot water and heat your home in the winter - gonna be kind of a challenge to muffle the fan noise though.
Never forget: Han shot first.
When I get an oil change now I also get "three free months" of Sirrius Satellite radio... racket and a half subscription seeking scum.
have a larger profile in the surveillance capitalism machine.
This is why, when I'm not watching, I'll set Netflix to stream movies I like.
Well, aren't you quaint. Next thing you'll be asking for is seed corn that you can replant year after year from the corn it grows, heated seats in your cars without a subscription payment, replaceable batteries in your battery powered electronics.
Everybody, everywhere has paid all sorts of services to "polish their online reputation" for decades.
I worked in a building where the entire floor beneath us was full of "reputation repair specialists" who did nothing all day but make people look better online, for money. It's not surprising that they are being replaced by bots.
what you’re trying to say with arbitrary numbers pulled out of the air about the amount of “coders” and potential users
No matter how wonderful and loved a project (aka business) is, it has expenses. A project like Codeberg's expenses scale with the number of users and how they use the system.
This policy allows them to get rid of the worst offenders and point to the policy as their reason.
Agreed. However, at the scale they are operating at, I wouldn't be surprised if they end up using a LLM assisted AI implementation to give them short lists of projects to review as potential "worst offenders".
It's like pornography - they'll know it when they see it.
I think they're great for what they're doing, but, truthfully, any "free use" system which has non-zero operating costs for bandwidth and storage is going to have potential problems that can't be waived away with simple policy statements. 8 billion people on this planet, maybe only 80 million coders, maybe only 8 million active in creation of projects that would end up on Codeberg, but AI probably tripled that number to at least 24 million people, and those people (including myself) are making 3-300x larger projects with AI, not only because they can now, but because AI needs that extra documentation to successfully implement larger projects... just like teams of human programmers do, but AI makes it faster with less humans in the loop.
It's a matter of degrees, one in a million consumers might be enough of an "enthusiast" to spend the money to setup a personal server. Even if I had the money ($100K) for a "powerful enough" server, the market is changing so fast it's definitely rent-not-buy territory for anybody with any sense.