this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
549 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

6991 readers
1151 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Another article for free (but seriously subscribe to 404 they do great work) https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/graduation-speaker-booed-ai

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Love it how she started looking around when everyone started booing her, like "hey someone tell me what's going on", but there was no Claude around to explain it to her.

That's what happens when you surrender your critical thinking to AI.

I bet the delusional cunt spent the rest of her afternoon asking AI what happened and getting consoled by it.

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I thought the background was baked beans

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 39 minutes ago

This is Lemmy, after all.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago

That was such a "don't you have phones" moment.

Amazing how horribly out of touch these folks are.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 9 points 22 hours ago

This is like the groom on his wedding night, going on and on about how fuckable all the Bridesmaids looked, and then being shocked that his bride is pissed off at him.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 14 points 1 day ago

The kids are alright.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I remember watching Bill Clinton speak at UCF. He called the school the military simulation capital of US academics.

The school's large population of future debt slaves in the audience (getting worthless degrees in Psychology or Business) didn't understand.

I found it elucidating, being a student of Engineering. I studied with fellow students working in Research Park working on computer vision algorithms, teaching missiles how to be more effective at bombing schools and hospitals abroad. They badly needed the money to pay for the college education.

Few students at UCF were aware of their own school's involvement in the military industrial complex. Clinton was very aware.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She tried to justify AI by citing the success of the Internet? The Internet was not created for the express purpose of replacing workers.

[–] northface@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 day ago

And in contrast to the avalanche of slop we are currently enduring, the pre-commercialization era of Internet was wild, in a fun way. Yes, we had slop back then too, but it was naïve, gorgeous, hand-crafted slop.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The number of competent experts who are impressed by an LLM wielded in their specified field, is as vanishingly infinitesimal as legitimate and justifiable invocations of the term ‘AI’.

Those who have expressed the greatest enthusiasm for ‘AI’ are typically the farthest removed from actual, nuanced comprehension.

It’s a grift economy built on statistically luke-warm, vibe lobotomised corpses.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Problem is the targe is not the competent experts, but the managers of the competent experts, who have basically eternally been inherently skeptical of those experts and looking for the flimsiest hope to discard them.

Many of the best and most important people let themselves be subordinate to some idiots.

Not pertinent to AI, but just had one of these 'leaders' laying out how some project was going to go and why we didn't even need to bother with any contingencies and that folks would be wasting their time. Every one with a whiff of experience knows these projects don't go as described 90% of the time, and prepping the usual contingencies is less than an hour as long as you just plan to do it in advance. However, the very expensive partner service says they have it in hand, and despite this same partner boffing the last 6 of these in a row, the idiot still has absolute confidence in them...

In short, these guys get put in charge and are idiots and folks let them stay "in charge" because they don't have the will to fight it.

[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 96 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She's a Real Estate VP. Out of touch by default.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Who chose a real estate VP for commencement speaker in the first place. That's the peraon we should be calling out of touch.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's Florida, her company probably donated a ton to MAGA.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Where were they 5 years after getting the first successful steam engine? This shit is just getting started..

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Her reaction was shock that they weren't totally on board with being excited about their primary competition in the job market.

Who booked this clueless tool?

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't even consider LLMs that. I just consider them a massive waster of power and water that inherently degrade everything they touch and have terrible impacts on cognitive and behavioral health.

I'm not worried that AI is gonna take my job, not in a thousand years, what I'm worried about is that AI is going to BURN THIS PLANET on top of being a constant daily annoyance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

The sorts of folks that get invited and accept these sorts of engagements are frequently self absorbed and out of touch. The hubris needed to think some randos want to hear you speak... Only hope is if the person has some particular reason they would make sense (e.g. if they are an alumni, then at least they might feel like they have a connection).

The same general phenomenon as when they thought a centerpiece of the Xbox One release should be.... DVRing the Price is Right..... The same as when blizzard said "Do you guys not have phones?"

If you are lucky, a speaker will just say nothing vaguely specifically.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] november@piefed.blahaj.zone 79 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] cloudy1999@sh.itjust.works 72 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I had to watch the video. She looks so confused when they start booing. She tries laughing it off, says something else to tout AI and is booed again. Completely tone deaf.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 66 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She gets booed, regroups, then says "two years ago AI wasn't a part of our lives" and then gets cheered for it 🤣

[–] SmackemWittadic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah but she doesn't realize that the people are cheering because they miss those days

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

She definitely did lol watch the full video, she's totally surprised.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Droopy@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Shorter Version Gloria Caulfield Booed at UCF Graduation Speech the comments are on fire.
youtubeUser - "Watching this was so cathartic you have no idea"

another User - "I hate when people compare AI to the birth of the internet era and cellphones. Those eras did not have anywhere near the same level of job loss implications and the threat of eradicating as many junior positions as AI does. When boomers make this kind of comparison, it comes off as so disconnected and tone deaf. I hope I'm wrong about AI and that it actually creates massive new industries for entry level workers, but I don't see that happening anytime soon. Not in my lifetime at least. We're about to see mass homogenization of culture and entertainment, significant privacy concerns, mass surveillance, scams, and an absolute gutting of entry level jobs; this is already beginning to happen. I just don't trust corporations and business owners to not squeeze every last cent out of AI agents and only hire employees as a last resort. That's their end game and they don't even hide it at all."

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I wish more people would understand that LLMs are "taking" extremely few jobs away. The "chatbots can do a real job" narrative is just there to bump up the stock prices.

A real AI would incur massive job loss, but the job losses we're seeing now being blamed on AI are really just the same normal oligarchal greed at work.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Right now the ai companies are highly substadising their products. They announced recently that it actually costs them more than it does to pay a human engineer to write the same code.

That means it's just a trap. They are trying to get companies to go all in so they will be dependent on them when the engineers are gone and they will raise the price significantly.

They are betting on it VERY hard with massive data centers though.

I see not only an era of scamming that will break basic human trust systems but the reliance on it will riddle previously methodical fields like medicine, design and law with a barrage of flaws and falsehoods no one will check until they cause failures.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Not just jobs, but:

  • Scammers that make convincing fakes
  • Knock-offs that get your views before you realize that it's hollow slop instead of what you were expecting for
  • Flooding the field of creative content with hollow stuff devoid of actual creative intent, mistaking verbosity and detail for quality creative content.
  • Exploiting small communities that either let big tech walk over them in general, or they just have to bribe a few city managers at pretty modest prices.

I suppose the scammers are about the only arguably common downside between the AI boom and the dot-com boom, but it was at the time less compelling because it was such an 'alien' medium that people weren't trusted, whereas AI is corrupting a familiar medium with even more scam than people are used to.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 53 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Industrial Revolution: New machines almost instantly made factory owners 1000 to 10000 times wealthier.

LLMbeciles: New machines can't count the 'r's in "strawberry".

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

New machines can't count the 'r's in "strawberry".

No, they can! They just first need to have a system prompt instructing them to generate and run a python script to do it.

And yet, it's us meatbags being called inefficient.

[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Also, the industrial revolution fucked over a lot of people during the transition period so even if it was an accurate comparison it's rather callous to celebrate it.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

And not only that, the only way life got better was by labour unions and regular people demanding a better life

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is not a free article. It doesn't load.

If you want to share from 404, copy and paste the whole text here. Else, find another source or don't share it at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

heh. they turned the comments off on the youtube vid. can't imagine why.

load more comments
view more: next ›