this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
543 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck AI

6991 readers
1150 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Another article for free (but seriously subscribe to 404 they do great work) https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/graduation-speaker-booed-ai

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Yeah, it's definitely the next Dot Com bubble. It'll eventually be about as evolutionary as the transition from Radio to Television, but there's gonna be a major course correction first.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 41 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Radio to television is generous, IMO. LLMs aren't a path to AGI or even particularly useful to most people.

I believe that’s the point for proponents of AI: compare it to something that was once considered amazing, hoping you’ll fail to realize that it’s like comparing apples to oranges.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any machine or algorithm that cannot consistently produce the same results from the same input is fucking garbage and that and LLM in a nutshell. Garbage.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
for a in {1..20}; do shuf -i 1-1200 -n 1;done
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A randomization function is expected to return a random result and works consistently.

Yeah, I was just playing around being annoyingly pedantic. I agree with your original statement, for what that's worth.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Telegraph was the big one, that shortened broadcast communication times from weeks to a couple days. (Receiving the news telegram -> publishing and distributing the newspaper). Radio shortened it from a couple days to a couple hours. Those two were revolutionary factors. TV was a relatively small evolution of radio. It didn't increase the speed or breadth of distribution; it only expanded the scope of what was distributed.

The internet was the big revolution. Cloud computing was another, smaller, revolutionary idea. AI is a rather small evolutionary take off from that.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Once again, LLMs have to prove useful for something first. I wager they're actually costing companies in the long run. Nothing about a net loss is revolutionary.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We are due for a course correction on Cloud Computing and Storage. Too many companies trust their most intimate secrets to Microsoft, Google, and Amazon; not to mention CloudFlare.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If I had to guess, too many government agencies are probably bought by big tech. Otherwise, they wouldn't let that neglect of privacy fly at such a scale. I suppose the question is when people will get sick enough of it that it results in a change.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

most of eu/usa is trying to give access to palantir to private info, Uk with NHS, and palantir trying to get SSN/flock cameras, or other.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

And to have them be useful is a lot of setup and fuck around, needing to be done by someone experienced and not given to idiots to use for anything requiring reliability or rich substance.

I'd say they're like going from 3.1 to 95, but web versions which most people use are pretty useless for non-basic things and basic things it's usually faster to do yourself.

It's just how algorithmic prediction is.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

AI (specifically the LLMs for which “hyper scale” datacenters are being built) are by good for summarizing large volumes of text down into a few points with reasonable accuracy.

This makes them good for pouring over all the data you’re being forced to store in the cloud, including your conversations, financials, political donation receipts, and that patent you’re preparing to file for your million-dollar idea that just might work. Please be sure to associate all your accounts with your verified ID or they will be subject to deletion and your name will be automatically listed on the suspected terrorist and pedophile watch lists.

Continue to participate in capitalism. We demand it.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Pets.com, Webvan, Boo.com, eToys, and Kozmo will bravely lead us into the next Industrial Revolution”

Yeah that does sound dumb.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

At least the internet had broad utility, just wasn't ready in 1999 to support e-commerce on that scale. It is now. I can't imagine a future where LLMs are similar. Even a theoretically perfect LLM is not like, actually knowledgeable.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I loved Kozmo, had a few friends who rode for Kozmo in Boston

[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Look, it'll put all your searches right there at the top in one roughly half-correct paragraph! All it takes is a quindecupling of energy usage and water usage in your community! Get some perspective!!