this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
321 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29757 readers
1923 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disapproval rose to 62%, the worst of his two terms in office, amid economic issues since launching his war against Iran

Six months out from November’s midterm US elections, Donald Trump’s disapproval rating has reached 62% – the worst of his two terms in office – according to a new Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll.

The US president received his worst ratings on the cost of living and other economic issues since launching his deeply unpopular war against Iran in February, which has plunged the global economy into an oil crisis and sent gas prices rocketing to a four-year high.

Trump achieved majority disapproval on his management of every issue measured, including Americans disapproved of his handling of that war by 66% to 32%, while a staggering 76% disapproved and only 23% approved of his handling of the cost of living. Two-thirds of Americans now feel the country is headed in the wrong direction.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago (4 children)

As much as I like seeing the high disapproval numbers, I find it a bit disappointing how many people will turn on their president over gas prices. I mean, after all the insane shit this guy has pulled, all it takes is a buck or two more per gallon to turn them. We aren't even in a shortage situation. No lines. Nothing.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think it’s more a case that the people for whom gas prices are A Thing have now joined all the people who already disapproved of him… so another 5% of the population, who believed his lies right up until there was no denying that his actions were hitting their pocketbooks.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

But that's the point: the suffering of others, which they could prevent simply by voting, wasn't enough for them. It wasn't until it hit them in the pocketbook this way (after reduced healthcare and still-unmaintained infrastructure and tariff tax and, and, and) in addition to all this other ways it preventably hit them in the pocketbook already, that now they jump on board the harm-reduction bandwagon.

There are simply no more arguments for supporting this man that make sense logically; and there haven't been for 10 years (before his first narcissist orade if fools), of course, but the apology now needs to be a little more sincere.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It has immediate impact and they cannot lie about the giant numbers in their face while they pump. Even the dumbest of people can grasp this.

This.

ICE kidnapping people doesn't affect them because they are special. They are in the in-group.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why can't they grasp it when he boldly lies to our faces?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Honestly? I think for most they're too far deep in the right-wing Matrix to be able to tell truth from lies. Many people don't fully understand just how these people live in a completely alternate reality than the likes of you and me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Xerxos@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As someone else put it: "I'm fine with rapes and pedophilia, but I draw the line at higher gas prices!"

[–] ursus262@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

What does that say about America? I think it's past saving to be honest.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago

Probably that the rural, least populated parts of the country hold a disproportionate amount of political power and this is a consequence of that. Well that and the deliberate defunding/deconstruction of our education system.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea. There are by now hundreds of valid reasons to kick that guy, and gas prices are the deal breaker?

Many Americans just seem to hate all other humans

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Many Americans just seem to hate all other humans

I would say it's more pathological indifference, likely spawned from the idolization of "rugged individualism". I'm often reminded of a nearly decade-old article titled "I Don't Know How To Explain To You That You Should Care About Other People".

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's good to take a step back every once and a while, and remember that at one time we reported approval ratings...

There's a psychological effect coming into play here.

We need to go back to:

28% approve of trump

It hits 100% different

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And if those idiots realized they were in the minority, they might feel shame...

They're dumb enough to see 62%, "trump" and that the number is higher and everything seems great.

They see a shrinking number that's how many agree with them...

Even they start to rethink their position, if nothing else out of cowardice.

We need to play to the audience, and in this context theyre all fucking idiots.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As in: if those people could read, they would be very upset?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Partisan diehards simply know where their bread is buttered

[–] stickyprimer@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it as simple as 38% approve and 62% disapprove? Many polls have something in the middle for “neither approve nor disapprove.”

In those polls, the disapproval rate can move without anything changing in the approval rating, and that’s worth reporting.

Just saying It isn’t entirely either/or.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 week ago

37% per the article

[–] inari@piefed.zip 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Wow, 25% of independents still approve of him. Insane.

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 17 points 1 week ago

I've worked in market research. It's just like the Internet. Bad faith respondents are very common and very eager and they all give exactly the same inane responses.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe their brains are independent from their bodies?

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How many years have I been reading this headline? Too damn many

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

No no. It went from 60% to 62% This is a historic event. Only 38% of Americans like his policies now. Only 38% would take up arms to defend him. Only 38% would kill you to protect the files. Only 38%

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Word salad headline. Lol. Can’t just call it straight.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that a lot of Americans are really stupid.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Americans are groomed to be stupid by the corporate media.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Until he is dragged out of office, doesn't matter

[–] Red0ctober@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Kicking and screaming, on television

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I am here to promise you that conservatives will vote for the next one to come along.

And it's not like conservative candidates are going to get any better from here on out.

They're not the brightest, which we all know tends to correlate strongly with conservatism. I'll always remember the idiots in 2004 who voted for a second W. Bush term because "he made this mess, now he needs to clean it up".

That's like hiring an incompetent employee who messed up a mission-critical project and not only took no accountability, but verifiably lied about their actions, yet you continue employing them to finish the project.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It doesn't matter. If he stays in power past Jan 2029, he won't need an election (or any popularity polls) to do it.

[–] BigBrownDog@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Been hearing weekly this for 10 years. Shut the fuck up

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's obvious that disapproval ratings mean nothing yet the media machine constantly spits that up. I guess it makes all of us anti-trump folk feel a bit better while the brazen pedophile stumbles ever upward.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It does. It reflects the general population's approval and therefore affects the decision making of politicians looking for reelection.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no way he's getting reelected at this rate

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

None of this matters because at the end of the day the American electorate is just too stupid for any of this to count for anything.

They're always going to vote for the next hard R that will promise them that they'll make it all White and now you'll probably won't have a choice but to vote for the hard R in many states going forward.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

No one has ever seen (disapproval) ratings this high!

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What do you think the bunker is for. Dude is not leaving alive. Let's hope he follows Hitlers lead and eats a bullet soon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I disapprove so much it should count multiple times.

load more comments
view more: next ›