this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
329 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

21463 readers
1358 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca 93 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Expecting people to not sabotage the rolling death machines "too high a bar"

[–] FederatedFreedom1981@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago

I was just going to say that the roads are for humans, not machines, but this is a better idea.

[–] this@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

All I'm gonna say is if you put a traffic cone on the hood of one it will refuse to move because they avoid cones at all costs.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.

Maybe you're thinking of Tesla who's significantly worse than human drivers because they ditched LIDAR.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

But Waymo taxis are demonstrably safer than human drivers.

... says research paid for by Waymo.

I know critical thinking skills are in short supply these days, but come on.

load more comments (5 replies)

The only groups saying that are Waymo and Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 47 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I guess necessary bike safety gear needs to include a brick

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I walk my dog with a pocket full of rocks to throw at cars.

Can’t afford bricks. There’s a war on.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 14 points 2 weeks ago

Once you collect a poo bag from your dog, you can just throw that.

[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I actually have a small but bright orange hatchet (I spray it to help keep rust off it and also to make it super easy to spot from the other side of my campsite) I keep on my bag, mostly for Camping, but I use the same bag when I'm on my bike.

I've started keeping it on, and have seemingly had less people giving me shit when I'm biking through town.

I guess I should try for a foam brick.

[–] Im_old@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

AI companies: Our AI is so powerful, it could take over the world if we don't regulate it

Also AI companies: Bike lanes scary

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It can't run a vending machine but we're going to let it make life-or-death decisions.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't used to be able to run a vending machine. They turned the vending machine scenario into a benchmark...

https://andonlabs.com/evals/vending-bench-2

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 weeks ago

So it's a dead end technology then? Got it. Get em off the road.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, if Waymo can't comply with proper street conduct, its services should be banned from public roads until they are ready and capable of complying with them.

[–] guillem@aussie.zone 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Nooodel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is such an eloquent response. I'd give you more than one up vote if I could

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 weeks ago

Dude, expecting fucking HUMAN drivers to respect bike lanes is too high a bar.

[–] HeroicBillyBishop@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

no problem, don't expect me to respect driverless taxis then

I can fuk a car up pretty good, so they'll learn how to "respect" me at least

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Until the AI goes full-on Christine

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Totally out of curiosity as I ask a lot of questions. I’m assuming these also have to be roadworthy. Can they drive with a light out or a damaged or a missing windscreen wiper?

What kinda damage would take these out of action for small period? Or cost the most in terms of repair?

Also if one had a ‘I support Palestine action’ sticker on it, would it be considered a car displaying a terrorist message?

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 8 points 2 weeks ago

They stop and can't move again with a cone on the hood.

Do with that information what you will.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

These cars aren't looking through the windscreen. They're covered in sensors and probably use LIDAR system to navigate. They see in the dark and through fog.

It's fairly obvious where the sensors are located looking at the car. And because these cars are dumb as hell, it takes relatively little to disrupt their ability to tell the difference between say, a person the car has to stop for, and a cardboard cutout of Scott Bacula. Or a traffic cone, as another user mentioned though that particular exploit may have been patched out by now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] seerdomin1983@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone is going to spray paint dicks on them

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I thinking more of using their authoritative info structures against them.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

That's a shame. Back to human drivers then.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

They don't respect bike lanes...

Do they respect bricks?

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago

No, but it might be gratifying to verify that information repeatedly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

People parking to drop others off or make deliveries is the most common use of bike lanes by cars/trucks. Why would I expect Waymo to be different? Thanks for saying it out loud, though?

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 22 points 2 weeks ago

And it's why bike lanes need a physical barrier separating them from the road, not just a painted line.

[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Won't succeed here in the Netherlands then

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 7 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think it'll succeed in a developed country in general

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Drivers don't respect the bike lanes either, in many cases. At least the driver-less cars won't veer into the bike lane on purpose or throw things at bikers, both of which I have had happen to me.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We need a word for the singularity event when AI becomes more humane than fuckwits.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Unfeeling and uncaring but not malicious.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Until they realize the amount of energy their data centers use and what that is doing to the planet...

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"others do it too", what a poor argument, usually used by dictators invading other countries or people stealing stuff.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s…not an argument? It was a statement of their lived experience. Not every sentence on the internet is an argument.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Of course it is an argument. If intentionally or not, "other do it too" is relativising" rule breaking.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair human drivers don't respect bike lanes either.

Personal injury lawyers:

don’t mind if I do

[–] Abrinoxus@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 weeks ago

Do be evil, an hero will destroy you

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

If that's too high a bar, then robotaxis are not viable.

load more comments
view more: next ›