Not discussing pay rate with coworkers/colleagues. I mean, talk about complicity via fear. π«ͺ
Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
Not discussing pay rate with coworkers/colleagues. I
My day job is Union. Everyone's rates are well-published. We have less boring things to talk about.
Might be true for non-union gigs, but from my experience in union shops nobody cares because everyone can see what the pay rates are. Same with retirement plans.
I feel like anyone who isn't heavily involved in left wing internet spaces understands why you don't want to discuss pay with coworkers.
Someone fears their coworkers will find out they are making less, and will think they are less skilled, or maybe a pushover.
Or someone fears their coworkers will find out they are making more, and will fear their coworkers think they were manipulative in order to get it, think they are egotistical for sharing, or may become envious.
And then pay discrepencies invite unwanted feelings about "do I actually deserve to make more than him - I don't think I'm worth it" or "I make so much less rhan her, I must suck at my job."
Not discussing pay is a convenient way to sweep all this under the rug
That benefits bosses and deprives workers from knowing how much their labor is worth.
Socrates would say, and I would agree, that by following the rule we have already agreed to it.
Chomsky would disagree with manufacturing consent.
Chomsky thinks that the west shouldn't send aid to Unkraine to fight Putin's fascist Russia. Noam can go punch sand
And Socrates believed in slavery. There's a problem with expecting a purity from your philosophers.
and he was on the Epstein plane.
I mean if you follow under threat you haven't consented to any meaningful degree.
No one alive today agreed to Daylight Saving Time.
It has been introduced in my country during the early 80s, so I have to disagree on that one.
That's just about 40 years ago, so pretty sure there are still people left who agreed to it.
Yeah, I was over-simplifying to make my statement more dramatic and semi-funny, because so many people hate the clock-switching.
It's complicated. DST is mostly observed in North America, Europe, and part of Australia, and mostly since pre- or during WWII, BUT yes there are a few countries that started later. There are also some original ones that stopped observing it and then started again later. Also, some of the people still alive from when it started would have been too young to be able to agree to it.
So I'll amend my statement to "The vast majority of people alive today didn't agree to DST". Doesn't have the same punch.
Hands clasped behind the back means, "just looking". Seems pretty universal. People do this in stores all the time.

Honestly I do this because I like to fidget and I'm afraid I'll reach out to grab something I'm not supposed to.
It helps you balance when you're leaning forward to look at something.
I do it because it relieves pressure on my back
This was always just old man walk to me but I never thought about why old guys all seemed to do it
The elevator one seems pretty universal, but "ope" is regional.
These kinds of social norms aren't universal.
One that I wish were more universal would be standing on the right when using an escalator, and leaving the left side for walking.
Interesting point! I guess 'ope' is my regional bias showing lol. The escalator thing is a great example of a rule that makes life so much more efficient, yet people still ignore it. I wonder why some rules like 'facing the door' stick so well, while others like 'stand on the right' are a constant struggle. Do you think itβs because one is about comfort and the other is about efficiency?
Order of Adjectives. You do this unconsciously and don't even know you're doing it.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/grammar/british-grammar/adjectives-order
"The big black house up on the hill."
Never "The black big up on the hill house."
1 - opinion - unusual, lovely, beautiful
2 - size - big, small, tall
3 - physical quality - thin, rough, untidy
4 - shape - round, square, rectangular
5 - age - young, old, youthful
6 - colour - blue, red, pink
7 - origin - Dutch, Japanese, Turkish
8 - material - metal, wood, plastic
9 - type - general-purpose, four-sided, U-shaped
10 - purpose - cleaning, hammering, cooking
βHow are you today?β
βGood, you?β
βGood, thanks.β
UK version (male)- any deviation, even with your best friend/dad is a capital offence.
-Alright?
-Not bad, you?
-Yeah not bad.
Aw hell no. I trauma dump on everyone who asks me "How are you?"
Okay everyone avoid Jenna.
I like the tradition of "bless you!" when someone sneezes, but it is surely not necessary. And why do we say that for sneezing but not coughing?
I was at the urinal the other day and sneezed; someone said bless you from a stall.
It was awkward. Breaking one social norm to uphold another.
In the team I work with, we've established saying "Shut up!" if someone sneezes instead.
The proper response for coughing is "Die quietly".
I say gesundheit as I'm not religious and don't like to propagate religious sentiment, but I like the idea, too. I'm not German.
I say βpineappleβ, because unlike God, pineapples are real. Also it confuses people.
Pineapples want to digest me though
On the scale of malignancy, Iβd say the pineappleβs desire to digest us is pretty tame compared to the attitude of most gods. At least itβs tasty while it does so.
I hate this tradition fiercely and Iβm glad to have moved to a place where sneezes are generally ignored. As they should be.
feel the need to say 'ope' when we almost bump into someone
Found the midwesterner?
Showing respect to or emulating rich people.
Having to sell our labor for a fraction of the profit and being outcast if you want to opt out.
Coupling healthcare to employment.
Forcing the majority of retirement savings to be tied up in the stock market and killing company sponsored pensions.
Those aren't social rules and 2 of the 3 are about as regional as OP's "ope".
I miss the days of stopping at a yellow light to let the person turning left go.
All of them, in a way. We don't sign on to social rules we just kind of learn them, usually from our parents, then from other kids. Someone who's never been in an elevator might face inwards. I'm from the North of England. The first time I took a ride on the London tube I was 30ish, and I was completely unaware of the incredibly complex and subtle social rules at play there. I made eye contact and even smiled. I tried to strike up a conversation. This was completely wrong to do, it turns out. I never agreed to be so unfriendly, specifically on the tube, but now, I am.
So anyway to answer your question, the weird requirement to sort of suppress your humanity on public transit in big cities is maybe necessary, definitely not hilarious, but very, very strange.
"Ope! Lemme just scooootch on by ya!"
i wonder if there is natural instinct to not have your back to the only opening in any space... which then leads to the question of how can you discern a 'silent social contract' from instinct? is there even a difference?