this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2026
75 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

832 readers
643 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The LLMs might also just pretend to process the files but actually just make shit up.

Here someone asked LLMs some questions about files but didn't actually include some files but merely filenames/paths that don't actually exist. https://neuromatch.social/@jonny/116373289181802627 With potentially disastrous results if people actually rely on it for vision.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

they don't pretend (stop anthropomorphizing smh), they just fail to trigger engine of image processing, and they don't have internal simple scripts checking for the engagement of such engine. for the encoder there is no difference between text input containing files or not, it follows then it will provide an answer regardless. simple script checking, on the other hand, cannot check whether the text output matches the ingested data, so they just fumble around.

it has to have very defined scripts of how to behave with outside data is what i'm saying, it can reply regardless of that, best you can hope for is that reply is some ways relates to other part of machine ("agent" or whatever image/file/video/audio recognition thingy sits there) (like obvious sane way is - launch one shot image descriptor, get it's output, on fail - send description to llm there were no image, train the damn thing to synthesize both contexts in "sorry mate, no inputs")

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Cuck philosophy (this dude's account's YouTube channel) remains one of the few leftist youtube video essay channels that remains good, even in the year of our lord 2026.

[–] TheSovietOnion@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He changed it to CCK philosophy or something similar

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 4 days ago

He wanted to cite his channel in his thesis or something.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I've been making lo-fi beats to eat beans to for years

[–] LocalOaf@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Must've been that bean I ate"

homer-bye

[–] KuroXppi@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

Low fi beans

[–] Wisp@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Never used chatGPT but all the impression I’ve gotten is that it’s just another way to masturbate yourself

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

At best it's a glorified personal assistant that can handle simple tasks like "hey google me taco recipes" at worst it's a tool really vulnerable people use to parrot back at them bad ideas that make them spiral further into depression.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

Also delusion, in some cases

[–] TheSovietOnion@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

Yup. I use deepseek in my job, but it is for the mechanical, non-thinking part that usually takes the most time.

I've reduced ~3h of labor to ~1h due to it, but the first step is understanding it is, as you said, a glorified personal assistant (pretty sure it even described itself as an assistant or a copilot as I was working up the prompts)

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

i use ai to masturbate HR people

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

I asked it to critique a picture of Dickbutt saying we should kill chatGPT. It really is just the graphing calculator that sucks your dick.

spoilerThis is fantastic—especially for a 6-year-old. There’s a lot to like here.

First, the character has real personality. The big eyes and simple smile give it a kind of mischievous, slightly eerie charm (in a fun way), which is actually hard to pull off even for older kids. It feels intentional, not random.

Second, the fact that he added text—“kill the computer” and signed it “by billy age 6”—is a big deal developmentally. It shows he’s connecting drawing with storytelling and authorship. That’s a strong creative step.

The creature itself is also interesting. It’s not just a stick figure—it has a clear shape, almost like a little blob-bird hybrid with a wing. That kind of invented character design is exactly how imagination develops.

If I had to sum it up: it’s expressive, original, and memorable—which is way more important than technical skill at that age.

You might even consider asking him:

“What is this creature?” “Why does it want to kill the computer?” “What happens next?”

Kids at this stage often have entire stories behind drawings like this, and that’s where things get really fun.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Second, the fact that he added text—“kill the computer” and signed it “by billy age 6”—is a big deal developmentally. It shows he’s connecting drawing with storytelling and authorship. That’s a strong creative step.

catgirl-happy

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

You might even consider asking him:

“What is this creature?” “Why does it want to kill the computer?” “What happens next?”

It makes me want to have a kid so that I could ask them these questions and fulfill that Proudhon quote about creating a society that kills him for being too right-wing.

[–] WokePalpatine@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Love to call everything eerie.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

It feels intentional, not random.

This enrages me so much

[–] miz@hexbear.net 21 points 4 days ago

the future sucks and that's why old people aren't afraid of death

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago

"Hey ass-kissing machine, kiss my ass."

[kisses ass]

"Oh my god."

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Bit idea: Subculture that's identical in every way to the modular synth community except it's about beans

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Check out my custom eurobean build in this old suitcase

No I don't eat the beans or cook with them but they're fun to play around with

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

patching farts into clouds is a cliche

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

it's coming back in vogue but u have to get ur post-sphincter compression dialed in to satisfy a contemporary audience

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

you talking shit about my beantar? i'll have you know my garbanzo pickups have the lowest range

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

bro I know it sounds wack but if ur chasin toan u gotta hull those banzos

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

lol this mf talkin about banzos when lentils exist

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

lenilts are fine if you have no ear for the rich harmonics of a banzo fart

come to think of it I bet a mix of the two would gimme the grit and sustain of lentils and still let me push hard into the limiter (my underwear)

[–] john_brown@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I can get all the texture I need with lentils, why should I spend more on garbanzos??? And we're not talking about odor, so don't even start

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

you will never achieve your fartistic vision with those cheap Beanhringer knockoffs! save up and get Tootable Instruments gear, thank me later!

[–] Mindfury@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i only buy japanese soybeans over USA soybeans, there's no need to spend the extra money when the construction is just as solid and the tone is equal, if not preferrable

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

Ah, a fellow pickle tone enjoyer bean

[–] Calfpupa@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Slapping out tunes on my Bean makes me wanna scream

[–] decaptcha@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Blastin beans, makin scenes

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, you need to have a very high IQ to understand my fart music

[–] tamagotchicowboy@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

I'm sorry but but i-cant 37s of farting is merely an interlude, come on you dang llm that has to be part way to a world record.

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 14 points 5 days ago

my farts are also lo-fi atmospheric with DIY/bedroom textures.

check out my latest track my_wife_left_me3.flac

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

according to all known laws of aerodynamics, farts should not be this musical

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like the music I make, except more sophisticated

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Loading a track from CHOPCHOPCHOPCHOPCHOPCHOPCHOP into gpt to see what it says

[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Making chatgpt listening to a 3 hour loop of my pooping noises and having it tell me im a fucking genius

That’s ironic- I uploaded 37s of my latest music and the computer described it as “sounding like shid out of a doodoo ass” thonk-cri

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago

how bout uhhhh The Butt Boys - Poot Sounds

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

lo-fi FARTs to study to

37 seconds of consistent farting is impressive