this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
401 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

6670 readers
1412 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

AI agent fucks up and makes you pay more, or leads you to buy things that straight up don't exist? You'll pay for it.

AI agent fucks up and sells you your whole order for $0.01? Sorry the AI isn't really supposed to so you can either cancel your order or pay the full "correct" retail price.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 17 hours ago

they have been upcharging thier instore products as it is, year by year. plus eliminating thier own in-store brand for "deal worthy"

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is an AI agent any different than any other software just because it does inference with a LLM? If I order something from their website and I get overcharged due to a bug, are they also not responsible?

I know as a software engineer, I’m responsible for the code in any PR that has my name on it, regardless of what tools I may have used to generate the code, including AI. Are their dev teams not responsible for making sure their shit works?

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because most other software the dev understands what he build, or can debug if something is off. LLM are just black boxes the devs have no clue why sometimes the answers are very incorrect.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure, but AI engineers are well aware of that fact (or should be) and there are ways to limit the potential damage, like human in the middle, especially for purchases over a certain threshold. Overall, a system like this like this should never really be trusted to make purchases without the customer approving each purchase.

Then again, if you’re going to approve every purchase, I’m not sure how it really saves time. If it is purchasing without approval, the first time it buys something you didn’t want and you have to battle Target to get it refunded will negate any time savings. Largely seems like AI for the sake of AI.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Not if they make all their customer support AI as well and make it impossible to talk to a human!

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

We are not responsible for our own systems - idiots

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Guess I'm just stupid, because I still don't understand what the AI agent is doing. I've read the article and the comments in this thread

is this something where you can have a conversation with a chat bot, and tell it to go buy you something? like you can chat and say oh I'm looking for this particular thing, and then it will tell you what that is and can purchase it for you? and so it might tell you one thing and order another, or just completely make something up and order some random shit. because if that is the case then yeah that's absolute crap, that's their customer service agent and they are responsible for its behaviour

kind of weird that the article doesn't make this clear.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Based on the terms and conditions, my expectation is it will randomly order a bunch of expensive items you didn't want on your behalf whenever a quarter in on track to miss the target numbers.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't find the bot on the site, looks like it's on the app.

They applied AI to the search requests. If you search for "Find me soemthing for fahters day." It will figure out you meant Fathers Day and say "suggestions for fathers day"

While an LLM on such a short leash will probably do fine with a fixed catalog, there's still an outside chance it will go absolutely nuts and suggest weird, possibly inappropriate things. I really don't know how weird or inappropriate targets catalog can be but I'm sure you could find something. They're just trying to head people off at the pass by saying, "If you order it, you have to pay for it, even if we recommended something weird to you."

It looks like they've got some decent guardrails in. I tried to trick it out and ask it for a potato salad recipe. It gives me back old-school results instead of an AI smart response.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This appears to be an upcoming "people bought similar" bot that will automatically add items to your cart based on trends.

It will be up to the user to remove them at check out.

@mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

ohh fuck, yeah you add shit to my card and require me to remove it, everyone will just stop buying there online, even those not boycotting now.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

Nope! That violates the deeply rooted basis of law for the sale of goods. Such sales are subject to individual states' laws, but most follow Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. There is inherently no meeting of the minds (the very foundation on all contract law dating back before America was even discovered by Europeans) if AI is engaging in anything commercial in nature, much more so if they're mistakes.

You cannot pull a bait and switch on non-conforming/mistaken goods without letting the other party choose to accept or reject the goods. This is more so if that choice is made before the mistake is discovered and the price changed. Here, the supplier has engaged in the risk of loss by utilizing an untested replacement for workers.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Laws you say? I guess we'll see you in court. Unless you can't afford that. Then you can get fucked.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

Yep. Class action lawsuit. Get fucked out of hundreds or thousands of dollars; receive $12 and a coupon book in compensation.

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago

They are likely bribing ... erm ... I mean "lobbying" politicians right now to get a legal loophole around this.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

There were laws about IPs and copyright, the kind that would prevent any corp from parsing basically the whole internet and use it without any restriction or consideration for the content creators. Do you remember what happened to those?

[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I see corporations have found a new use case for AI - bypassing the laws and avoiding any responsibility.

"AI did it, there's nothing we can do, because it's not our fault".

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 1 day ago

In sane countries this results in charges being laid

[–] U7826391786239@piefed.zip 127 points 2 days ago (2 children)

am i old? i simply can't imagine handing control of my money over to AI because i can't be assed to order shit online all by myself--which takes less time than writing a prompt

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Can't imagine handing control of anything over to an LLM.

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Nah, you are wrong. Since LLMs are for entertainment, making it control an NPC is totally fine, since hallucinations will only make this NPC funnier.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's in an imaginary world. Not really what I was getting at.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Whimsical418@aussie.zone 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The cynic in me says they'll start making the normal online ordering process much harder and worse to try to force ai shopping usage

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Retailers will eliminate search, product sort and filters, etc.

They will dumb it down to happy value meal, the generous ones may allow ala carte ordering, a nod to legacy web purchasing. Imagine allowing consumers to choose their own products?!? How dated and unprofitable.

With most people nearly illiterate, as designed, they won't complain.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago

it will likely "hallucinates suggestions", thats not even the same category of the item you want.

[–] parson0@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago

Entertainment purposes only

[–] _chris@lemmy.world 94 points 2 days ago (5 children)

If you’re dumb enough to trust the AI agent at all, but especially one that is provided, owned, and operated by the capitalist company that you’re shopping at and you expect it to act in your best interest, that’s a special kind of stupid.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Yes, if you, or any other relatively young or middle aged Lemmy user got got by trusting Target's AI shopper, I'd laugh.

But that's not a representative sample. This will be used to exploit the poor, uneducated, and elderly.

I think our best bet is that someone creates a script that burns through Target's tokens and that drives the costs up to unsustainable levels.

Maybe that's a pipe dream, I just know that our lawmakers will do nothing to help, so that's what we're left with.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thus reads like a need for regulation.

Thanks Trump for preventing such regulation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

promptly notifying the Agentic Commerce Agent and Target of any activity

Which will involve trying to persuade another ai agent that it isn't use error and that you really need to speak to someone.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 26 points 2 days ago

I guess that also means if I successfully gaslight the AI into giving me a 120% discount, Target has to pay for it.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Who the fuck is so stupid and lets an AI do the shopping?

[–] ledasll@lemmy.wtf 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you seen who is USA president?

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

What has Benjamin Netanyahu to do with AI?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

Oh look, even more reasons to avoid target AND AI.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Why would I need AI to shop at Target for me in the first place?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago

Target and Walmart also say that if you don't scan something when you go through self checkout, you can be charged with shoplifting.

In other words, the companies have none of the responsibility and people have all of the liability.

load more comments
view more: next ›