this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
170 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

6507 readers
310 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Existing licensees are grandfathered.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] etherphon@piefed.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Really sad how companies went from making money by innovating to making money from being shitty patent trolls. Dolby have any engineers left or is it all lawyers?

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

dolby technologies aren't even the most advanced, they're just the most marketed, most expensive, most cutthroat in the industry

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago

mm, I never really thought about that, they were just always a name in audio ever since cassette tapes for me. It'd be a shame if they had anything to do with what happened to E-mu/Ensoniq and then Creative Labs as they had so many great technologies and ideas. Consumer audio is pretty dull now honestly.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 23 hours ago

None if you want it to work on consumer hardware.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I thought h.264 patents are expired

Edit: it was patented in 2003, so 20 year period is gone already

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Wikipedia covers it nicely:

Since the first version of the standard was completed in May 2003 (22 years ago) and the most commonly used profile (the High profile) was completed in June 2004[citation needed] (21 years ago), some of the relevant patents are expired by now,[75] while others are still in force in jurisdictions around the world and one of the US patents in the MPEG LA H.264 pool (granted in 2016) lasts at least until November 2030.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Video_Coding?wprov=sfla1

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So paying is optional? I don't get it..

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Neither do I. Most of h264 is either open domain now or it will be very soon

[–] pricklypearbear@lemmy.world 75 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hope this pushes the royalty-free alternatives more. That's a crazy jump.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 58 points 2 days ago (2 children)

AV1 already wins handily as a codec, and the only thing keeping it from being adopted more broadly than is currently the case is lack of hardware decoders on older hardware. This problem naturally solves itself as old hardware gets replaced.

Even then, dav1d is a remarkable piece of software, and software decoding is pretty viable for AV1 thanks to it. Many places have already adopted AV1, and you should expect to keep seeing it get adopted as time goes on.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AV1 has recently gotten involved in a lawsuit by Dolby saying that they're breaking like 5 of their patent, so there's some issues there as well.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These things always happen because of how dumb software patents are. There's no guarantee the lawsuit will stick, nor do I necessarily expect it to

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 days ago

It's even worse than that: the USPO abrogated their responsibility to evaluate patents for prior art and conflict with other patents to the courts.

So they just issue patents willy nilly and expect courts to decide which ones 'win'.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Better hardware encoder support would help, too. It's insanely inefficient to encode without that dedicated hardware, compared to h264/h265, where dedicated hardware support is there.

I was hoping Apple would add it when they shipped the M4, and now M5, but nope.

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hardware encoder support I think is generally less critical. Decoding is the process that needs to happen real-time, while most encoding can be done far in advance, unless you're live broadcasting or operating at YouTube-scale.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On a media server encoding is typically done in real time

[–] VibeSurgeon@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

It depends on what the receiving unit can decode. Sometimes there will be transcoding, but it's usually something you want to avoid.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I agree, my point was that encoding needs to be more efficient, both in time, and resource consumption. That isn't quite there yet, for AV1. It is improving, albeit slowly.

[–] baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

non apple chips can pretty much all hardware encode AV1 nowadays. it's really just apple doing its own thing again

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's too bad the GPU prices are utter insanity due to the LLM pyramid scheme poaching global RAM. I read an article yesterday that said Apple is likely eating that RAM overhead as a loss to ensure their long term strategy.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I still wonder why video is about the only thing for which a restricted format is still the "industry standard"?

We nowadays take photos in JPEG or WebP format, draw raster images in PNG or WebP format, vector graphics in SVG format, our documents are PDF or OOXML or ODF or HTML, all of which are (at least technically) open standards. Video is the only thing that still mostly runs on formats with restrictive patents.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

AV1 is getting note and more common

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which royalty free alternatives exist?

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Theora, VP8, VP9, and AV1 are the ones that come to mind.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about Matroska? That was open to begin with, wasn't it? Is it not good for streaming?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MKV is a container format for bundling together streams of audio, video, and text. It does not provide the actual video compression, which is still typically h.264 or h.265.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Understood. They mentioned mpeg4 in the text, which (because of the MP4 container) got me on that route. Thanks for the clarification.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unrelated, screw you for getting that jingle stuck in my head for another week.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol what jungle? Or... do I even want to know?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your username…now with better looking drivers!

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh! Hahahahhahhahaha!!!

What country have I got? Hello?...

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

where did you get the number from, if you're not getting the references?
not to gatekeep, i'm just confused

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

...I do get the reference. Thus the userID, avatar, and name. And my previous comment, once I understood ayyy was referring to my username and not my previous comment. Maybe I'm misunderstanding your question?

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

maybe i wasn't getting it, but i didn't remember a "what country did i get" line, although i can imagine it

also i don't see an avatar or name, just the emergency number on my android client. i was gonna check it on my pc but i forgot.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Moss causes a fire, and tries calling number. He can't remember all of it, so he just enters some numbers to the tune. It's a hilarious scene lol

Not sure why you don't see my avatar or name. I'm on browser, and see everyone's.

Edit. Minute 1.27 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EBfxjSFAxQ

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The other answer you got hits it on the head already.

Here's an additional piece of info you might like: The webm container format is actually a specific subset of Matroska. The big players in the web recognised that it was a very useful open container format and adopted it for the web. They took a subset to make implementation in browsers easier and more uniform.

I did not know that, and I do like that piece of info! Thanks!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 51 points 2 days ago (4 children)

4500% increase

Absolute financial parasitism. This is why we can't have nice things. People who own a license of something critical can just sit on their asses decades on end and collect unearned income from other companies who will in turn move to cost to the consumers.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Remember when Martin Shkreli was thrown in jail for hiking the price of medicine by 5555%? That was 2017, but when something like this happens in 2026 nobody bats an eye.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 27 points 2 days ago

No? He was arrested for securities fraud, not for increasing the price of medication.

That's why you're not seeing anyone bat an eye now they didn't then either.

Medicine is not a codec.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

See also: capitalism more generally

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More specifically late-stage capitalism. This is a classic example of rent-seeking by a capitalist who has cornered a market.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 13 hours ago

It's just capitalism. The fascism we're seeing is late stage capitalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 11 points 2 days ago

They see the stupid sony lawsuit and want in.

load more comments
view more: next ›