stormeuh

joined 2 years ago
[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Widespread but being dismantled as we speak.

While the general public is not as indoctrinated to hate socialism as in the US, they are still (being made) resistant to preserving or expanding the welfare state. Every time cuts are made to social programmes, (conservative) people will say "we should be grateful with what we get" and "well we can't afford to keep paying for that", especially if it's cuts in another country that "has it better". The media are an active and gleeful participant in this, constantly running stories about "OMG we are running a deficit" and "how are we going to afford to pay for pensions?", manufacturing consent all the way. Finally, the EU and ECB also play their role as boogeymen by reprimanding states who run deficits, which national politicians then use as an excuse to cut social spending, instead of cutting military spending or taxing the wealthy.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

COMMUNIST MARXIST ANTIFA REEEEEE

~ Stephen Miller (probably)

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Nah that's just him reflexively victim blaming, ’cause he's a rapist.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

It's likely also plain corruption, just lawmakers creating ways for their friends to siphon money from government budgets with useless gadgets like this.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This already seems like a best-case scenario tbh.

2 years out from the election, Democratic establishment operatives are already going around and manufacturing consent for "settling" for Gavin Newsom. If that is the response to AOC not denying she may run, imagine what will come when she does announce. I'm expecting a tsunami of "she's unelectible" sabotage, like they did to Bernie twice.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Happy VIRM noises at 160kph

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait... were you arguing for or against AI slop?

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

So it was a communication issue then

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with your point that no one on the megayacht is personally to blame, they're just doing their job and (hopefully) not actively harming anyone.

It's just a little surprising to me that there's no mandate for ships above a certain displacement to carry a radio that's permanently tuned to the emergency channel. You know, a large ship may be more likely to have a crew member listening, so may cut down response times if and when that stuff matters during an emergency.

Of course the coast guard should still be monitoring and coordinating, it's just that maritime law requires you to respond to emergency calls, so why not mandate things so it's more likely you'll hear the emergency call? I guess that stuff is hard to mandate since all those ships are registered in Panama and the like, but still.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

The Académie Française is absolutely not a "committee of linguists". They're a bunch of rich conservatives who are way too high on nationalism, and they are infamous for going against the consensus of linguists (who they supposedly consult).

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I agree with your overall message, public water in public water can absolutely taste like drinking from a pool.

However, small correction and a fun fact: the chemical you taste is actually chlorine, not fluoride. I actually have no clue what fluoridated water tastes like (if it has a taste at all), because in the EU most countries don't fluoridate their water.

A small intake of fluoride is good for you by the way, it helps reduce tooth cavities. The amount you need is small enough though that you should get enough from toothpaste.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

It makes sense for everybody, except for those with a financial interest in selling and/or haggling over software licenses. That's not only the companies producing the actual software, but also legal firms and similar "specialists" who siphon off money from this system of complex IP law.

IMO the only way to transition to more software being open sourced, is to deconstruct these vested intrests with regulation. We need to fundamentally restructure the way software development is funded, and transition away from a model where ownership is the only thing that's profitable.

Doing that is delicate though, because as backlash from those vested interests, a lot of workers will likely lose their jobs. You need to make sure those people easily find new jobs working on open source, and communicate that effectively, so workers' job insecurity is as low as possible during the transition.

view more: next ›