this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
682 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

19921 readers
3475 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 171 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

ACTUALLY ITS BOILING SODIUM!!… ~which then gets used to boil water~

[–] Akh@lemmy.world 91 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I love that deep down, coal, gas, nuclear, this thing… all done to heat water, make steam, use steam to turn turbines…. We are just in a steampunk universe

[–] BC_viper@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago

Always has been.

[–] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 46 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Solar panel projects, which many have outstripped this and other projects in power limitations, do not boil water to generate electricity.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And wind turbines, and hydroelectric plants.

But all but solar cells are pretty much turbines all the way down

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hydroelectric power stations still rely on steam, it's just in another part of the cycle.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

What? Hydroelectric power stations use gravity and the falling or flowing water makes the turbines turn. No steam.

Thermal plants (nuclear, coal, gas), including solar thermal plants, use steam.

[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 25 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

He means water vapour, ie the rain cycle.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't say it was a good quip

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] ascend@lemmy.radio 52 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Oh neat like the ones outside Vegas, I always wonder if birds fly into the center

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well they certainly don’t fly out of it

[–] ascend@lemmy.radio 7 points 2 weeks ago

The ones with cameras might, probably a big conspiracy

[–] inari@piefed.zip 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Wakmrow@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

For like..... 0.002 seconds it's gotta feel real great

[–] suodrazah@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] errer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I love how fucking biased that article is. It mentions Obama like 10 times, including this gem:

Clearly, the Obama administration decided to spend taxpayer funds on a technology that was poorly conceived and quickly outdated.

Thanks for the hindsight, moron writer guy. So what's trump doing, investing in better renewables?

No, instead of building an underperforming power plant, he spent the same money just to prevent a power plant from being built.

Money for nothing and the chicks for free amirite.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago

Free roast pidgeon for the workers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 41 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I have a theoretical degree in physics

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 19 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

it better be a degree celsius

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago

Welcome aboard!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rayyy@piefed.social 22 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Never sell proven chemistry or physics short. Water transforming to a vapor is awesome. Maybe we could harness the energy of water transforming to a solid too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Aquilae@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago
[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It's so crazy that we've found like six different ways to use rocks to boil water. You'd think there'd just be two or three

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Kickstart this new source of clean energy by burning fossil fuels and spraying CFCs into the air. A hotter planet means water boils easier! 😃

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The efficiency of any heat engine comes from the difference between hot and cold, you can't get useful work if the water's already boiled.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It turns out boiling water is a really good idea.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bad_Ideas_In_Bulk@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There are a lot of options, but water works, is cheap as hell, and spills aren't much of an issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

It's incredibly silly that even tho we advance the scale of power, with electricity, solar and even nuclear, all we use it is to boil water. We just can't seem to be able t build any a more advanced mechanism, it seems.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Hard to beat spinning a magnet to generate electricity, and it's hard to beat boiling water to spin a magnet

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dippy@beehaw.org 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wind and photovoltaic have nothing to do with water

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Fabrik872@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Are we against boiling water only because it is old? Because if that is the only problem and we are ok with reliability and efficiency than i will take old

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

It's more that when you look at history and technological progress, and our (millenial's) own view on technological progress, the current stagnation and the permeation of said stagnation is a pain point. Every time we look at the news, it's something going fucking wrong, and never delivering on the promise of a better , brighter future.

We saw computers go from 100s of Mhz to 3 ghz ish and just get fucking stuck there. From 16 meg to 64 gigs, and now we can't buy any ram. We had touch interfaces being able to show you an arbitary interface and instead of innovation, we got swiping through stupid videos. We look through the history we didn't live through, and see that in the 20th century, we went through flight and rockets to the fucking moon and then nothing. We have a rocket going to the moon with people in it again for the first time since the 70s, and they aren't even doing anything new, just flying around. We expected there to be fucking bases on MARS by the time we got to the distant year of TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX.

Even now, when we're coming to harvesting power from the sun, in a seemingly new way (focusing it with mirrors onto salt) it's just going to be the same shit, nothing new, no innovation. Just put the hot rock into water, and harvest it through steam power as if it's the fucking 1800s.

Also, it has a light relation to the evolution inevitably creating crabs once again meme of Carcinisation.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Wot if instead of boiling water, we boiled CO2, and instead of boiling CO2, we kept it at high pressure so that it never quite reached boiling or condensation?

[–] Bazell@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Using water is cheaper and easier. That is all that stop your idea from being IRL.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"The only downside of your idea is that it is terrible."

[–] Town@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

This kills the crab

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How else are you going to make your tea?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Napster153@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

MA! NEW ACE COMBAT BOSS JUST DROPPED!!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

USSR also built an experimental power plant of this type. Sadly, it was closed and disassembled after the breakup of the Soviet Union.

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

They're pretty neat. Since the molten salt core stays hot for a while after the sun goes down, in some high-output high-storage setups they're cheaper than traditional PV panels + batteries while providing the same power.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well molten salt batteries are a thing, I'm presuming this is to buffer the output of the solar and that the losses were deemed acceptable given the renewable nature of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›