this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2026
148 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

83222 readers
5038 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 minutes ago

... Why?!?

Why would you do such a ridiculously stupid thing?

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 hours ago

Just vassal states things.

Act tough on press, but gargle US balls behind doors.

[–] mrnobody@reddthat.com 67 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

How is this not a violation of GDPR?! "Homeland Security" doesn't need the data, this is thousands of people for under 5 possible threats at most... this is fucking stupid! The game of bribery and backdoor deals of monetizing data keeps spreading, huh?

The only thing that makes the EU bureaucracy seem like it's functional are competing national interests. When all nations are being targeted by foreign automated propaganda through their social networks to promote shifts in their governments to allow this sort of bull, it doesn't even matter that the US is directly issuing threats against the EU, only just what corrupt long time career politicians can get out of it.

[–] it_depends_man@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Government is excluded from meeting GDPR requirements. ☺️

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 3 points 58 minutes ago

Uh? It’s a bit less generic than that… some activities of governments are excluded from the scope but not all data processing from government agencies are.

For example this particular personal data processing likely fits under the prevention of criminal offences and threats to public security and is highly unfortunate but let’s keep shit factual.

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's a real kick in the nuts.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Surveillance capitalism will continue the fascist takeover until the whole planet is a totalitarian company town and we are all slaves to big brother; paying a daily subscription to breathe.

I'm not even joking.

[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

What in the actual fuck?!

[–] DoubleDongle@lemmy.world 31 points 4 hours ago

What the fuck

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 28 points 4 hours ago

Ugh... Time and time again we are shown that US corporate shareholder needs dictate massive invasion of privacy and global over reach. Well this won't stand in Europe! Let's see what the EU says about this... Oh. Oh wait 😲.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago

which they probably already have. Look at that list, and that's only France ☞ https://bonjourlafuite.eu.org/

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago

Fuck! God!! No!!! Please!!!! 😡

[–] krimson@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago

They have a long way to go and the demands the EU is making will probably not be met by the US anyway so this will probably never happen.