this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2026
470 points (99.8% liked)

Memes of Production

1605 readers
179 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 67 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Look.

The creative urge is also the destructive urge. Right?

And one cant really be held responsible for what other people choose to do with the things one makes. Alfred nobel was trying to make mining safer instead he ended up ushering in a new and terrible era in war. Fritz haber invented the haber process to feed germany, not build bombs! The people who built the early internet are all horrified by what it has become.

Thats just an unfair standard of judgement. Do you think we should never build new things? Content ourselves with fire, perhaps bags knives and wheeled carts if we want to edge things? Even anprims think lean-tos are worth building.

So this last month ive spent designing the restraint system and tactile feedback mechanism for our new r1488 rape missile comissioned by the idf is just cool engineering work. If i didnt do it somebody else would. Somebody else might get it wrong. You know our department lead didnt even consider sensitivity differences in circumcised vs uncircumcised penises for the pilot feedback mechanism? Nobody else considered that an AFAB person might wear the feedback suit. You need a woke kinky queer in here to prevent sub-optimal pleasure for the end user–to prevent hurting more people.

Plus, as an engineer, im special and deserve special treats a six figure salary affords. How dare you suggest i live like a normal person. How DARE you!

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Have you considered renaming the rape missile

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 month ago

Yes it's now the superrape missile, thanks for your time

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Im just an engineer, not marketing or client relations. Not my department.

Edit: Now if youll excuse me, i need to finish this guidance for the teledildonics standard were using internally the new generation of semi-autonomous rape-reapers were putting out. Aggregating the feedback of a swarm for a single end user's pleasure a general president or minister is very difficult. A lot of our engineers still arent considering the possibility of AFAB users. Would you really rather women be meaningfully excluded from these roles?

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Sexual assault missile” is too many words. Woke has gone too far.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

And you can't abbreviate it because SAM is already taken by surface-to-air missiles.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 1 month ago

Marketing has considered calling it the 'skorzeny' rape missile rather than the R1488 rape missile but theres a lot of tension internally on which name is better. Most of our customers love both names of course, but internally were still optimizing with focus groups.

[–] endlesseden@pyfedi.deep-rose.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

while I can't speak on most of this, I will say the most relevant words I ever heard on the subject.

"If you can't predict what some one will use your ideas for to harm another creature. you should never share it as you cannot mitigate it by design". no matter what you make, some one will turn it into a weapon as the desire for weak, small people to supplement themselves through violence is ever present through human history.

greatest weapon of all time was the pen. it's not mightier than the sword at violence, but can silence a sword in a single stroke.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago

I think it takes at least a few strokes in every case.

Swords, also, are pretty good at silencing pens. Usually in one stroke/thrust.

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty much how I feel about anyone in tech working for Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta.

You need the paycheck, fine. I'm not going to judge your circumstances.

But you sold your soul, and please don't try to pretend otherwise.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would say those are much worse to work for than a defense contractor

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In what universe? As shitty as Amazon is, it's still way better than being a war profiteer.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Amazon is absolutely a war profiteer. As far as I can tell the military industrial complex isn't taking quite as direct an approach to dismantling our democracy and promoting fascism as the big tech companies. Just because they don't literally make guns and bomb (which they might actually do for all I know) doesn't make them any less evil.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Just because they don’t literally make guns and bomb doesn’t make them any less evil.

It actually does.

[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dan, the company man, felt loyalty to the corp

After 16 years of service, and a family to support

He actually started to believe the weaponry and chemicals were for national defense

Cause Danny had a mortgage and a boss to answer to

The guilty don't feel guilty, they learn not to

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My step son’s first job out of grad school for computer science was Raytheon. Paid well, got him his clearance (which basically guarantees employment as long as you have a pulse). I could tell it bothered him (as in, what they do), but he was very much trying to be a grown-up and pay his student loans and rent and all that. He’s 22, and very independent.

As soon as he got his clearance, he got another job doing things that aren’t directly related to killing people. Got a nice raise, too. He said the feeling of not working for Raytheon is better than the $10k sign-on bonus they gave him that he now has to pay back. “Worth it.”

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

one of my brothers was at lockheed. helped design and build the f35. one of the variants, at least. morale is so goddamned low there are regular suicides. he left before his mental health got too bad and spent some time homeless (he was too proud to move in with us or come out and go through the homelessness program i ran. we sent him as much money as we could afford and i gave him the names of the reliable programs out where he is. if folk here know aerospace, please don't say where they do f35 work here he deserves privacy). fair trade to keep him alive. he's at another (nonmilitary) aerospace as a commercial wrench for private flight and i haven't seen him this happy, like, since high school.

i can second that paying back that 10k was/is worth it, from my bro's experience.

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They know what they're doing is wrong, and they're fragile as hell about it

[–] lobut@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I never defend the companies I've worked for ... that's what their PR departments are for. I don't see why people feel the need for it. I've had friends join MS, Google and such and the way they defend them astound me. I'm just like, why ...?

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You must be defending them at least internally if you've been able to justify working there. I live in a van and roam the country committing Robin Hood style crimes 😇

[–] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

I live in a van and roam the country committing Robin Hood style crimes 😇

The real American dream

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pfff. Van? I travel by foot, eat vegan but only out of dumpsters, and use a flint and steel to burn down the houses of people who test on animals (after I make sure any pets they live with have been safely evacuated). I also spread wildflower seeds native to whatever region I’m in to boost the pollinators. Suck it petroleum simp! 😘

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I told a friend group that all that shit needs to be shut down and he cried on about how many jobs they create. He’s deeply Christian btw…

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

He shall judge between the nations, and shall arbitrate for many peoples; they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.

But what about the jobs??

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What happened to worker solidarity?

People gotta eat. But some jobs do call you to at minimum throw some sand in the gears. If you're not doing that then yeah fuck you.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Do you have solidarity with cops?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Nazis were just following orders to feed their family too.

There are plenty of ways to feed your family with more moral integrity than joining the oppressors. For instance, robbing a rich family, stealing copper wire from oil refineries, or gasp growing a garden with your community.

You can always use rich people as fertilizer if you want to be a little more morally acceptable.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

That's a few very moral ways to fail at feeding your family. Thieves from the ruling class often wind up in prison, and family farms were driven out of business.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (10 children)

I'd rather have solidarity with the people the bombs get dropped on than with the people building the bombs. Include war profiteers in your "solidarity" and shifts it away from class lines and into nationalism.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I totally feel the sentiment of this post but it raises an interesting question. Pretty much every job, especially nowadays, is linked up in some causal chain with helping a horrible company and/or horrible people do horrible things. At what point does it become acceptable? Is it about having more elaborate steps in between? What constitutes being further removed from doing harm?

I dropped the bomb

I built the bomb

I designed the bomb

I funded the bomb

I bought products from the company that funded the bomb

I gave a discount to a friend who buys products from the company that built the bomb

Etc.

Where do we start to consider employment ethical vs unethical? And to what extent? It seems like nothing will ever be 100% pure, but when do I get to stop feeling horrible about myself?

Not an abstract question, am job hunting

I drive a school bus, which means ... I help kids get the education they need to design and build the bomb.

Fuck.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I have been thinking about something very similar for the last year or two now. Almost every white collar job I can think of has large portions of its workforce twisted into contributing to some fucked up aspect of the capitalist machine. The one that I think is really pernicious is the medical industry. I actually think it's worse than defense in a way.

With defense there is kind of an upper limit to how much a company can probably charge for their product because how much more dead can the device make someone? On the medical side of things though, their products save or prolong people's lives and the people in charge know that. They know that even if the improvement is only marginal, as long as there is one (and sometimes even if there isn't one), they can probably extract as much money from people as they have.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i bought food from the company that pays people who buy stuff from people who pay people who pay people who work for the folk who shot the gun and dropped the bomb

oh no kill me i'm a nazi now

no ethical consumption in capitalism. you have to draw a line, but like, it's often the food company holding the gun too. who here eats pineapples and bananas? I sure as hell don't but i'm not going to starve to prove a point.

[–] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Simultaneously on the Fediverse:

  • you are a bad human for working for an arms manufacturer

  • support Ukraine against Russian aggression by sending them arms

Pick a lane already!

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I love pirating people's work but draw the line at using a computer to combine pirated works.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I don't if it's my personal consumption. I draw the line at trying to pass it off as mine and/or selling it.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Those aren't mutually exclusive. Ukraine is mostly using drones that aren't built by the MIC, which is why Trump just refused their help in protecting The US Military against Shahed drones. If he doesn't pour money into MIC contracts that daddy Putler approved, then he won't make the deal. The entire point is to isolate and cripple the US enough that we don't use our insane stockpile of guns when he declares dictatorship.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Are the people making weapons to defend Ukraine evil? Surely not, right? Hence working for a defense contractor is not inherently evil either.

Some are of course - like Peter Thiel's Palantir.

[–] KAtieTot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago

Lol. Lmao even. Snorting on jah.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And you, young engineer, you who dream of improving the lot of the workers by the application of science to industry - what a sad disappointment, what terrible disillusions await you! You devote the useful energy of your mind to working out the scheme of a railway which, running along the brink of precipices and burrowing into the very heart of mountains of granite, will bind together two countries which nature has separated. But once at work, you see whole regiments of workers decimated by privations and sickness in this dark tunnel - you see others of them returning home carrying with them, maybe, a few pence, and the undoubted seeds of consumption; you see human corpses - the results of a groveling greed - as landmarks along each yard of your road; and, when the railroad is finished, you see, lastly, that it becomes the highway for the artillery of an invading army.

[–] diabetic_porcupine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Well it’s not a lot. But it’s weird that it happened twice

load more comments
view more: next ›