I think I remember a meme from like 5 years ago saying that a dj in 2032 was gonna drop baby shark in a set and the club would go apeshit
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
313 points (97.9% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
38654 readers
3475 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I absolutely would and I'm already old as shit, mid 40s. I was not even remotely a child when that came out.
Tune was just a certified banger. π₯
Yikes. Offloading your kids onto endless mindless youtube videos is not taking care of them.
Edit: From some of the comments in this thread I'm learning that my view of baby shark is heavily colored by my experiences and does not accurately reflect the truth of baby shark's history or ubiquity. Because of that I conflated the baby shark obsession with the "letting TV raise your kids" issue, and that seems to have been in error. Sorry for the trouble.
It's clear that you either do not have children, or that it has never occurred you to take an interest in their interests.
You're right, I don't have children, but my sister does. I had to watch her sit her baby in front of endless youtube baby video playlists that did nothing but distract the baby for hours and hours while her mother did meth with her baby daddy. She was 2. She didn't have communicable interests of note. She was just neglected by a shitty mom.
Take your holier than thou attitude and shove it.
Your sister sucks, therefore YouTube is bad?
Both can be true, but not necessarily related.
Sounds more like to me like they shitty aunt and sister for just watching her sit her kid in front of a TV while she goes off and smokes meth. They just allow that to happen?
YouTube is awful for children.
phones in general are awful for children
I've seen dozens of stories about how the schools the 0.01% send their kids to have zero tolerance for phones.
They can afford nannies to make sure that the next generation of leaders knows how to think
There are plenty of scientific studies on how bad they are, but since society and economic pressure demand parents to kill themselves for their jobs, it's no wonder they have little to no energy to actually parent and resort to the easiest solution.
Iβve seen dozens of stories about how the schools the 0.01% send their kids to have zero tolerance for phones
Continuous glucose monitors update to smartphone apps. Zero tolerance phone policies are disability discrimination lawsuits waiting to happen and the schools the 0.01% have lawyers good enough to figure that out.
Or, someone could develop a 'dumb' machine that only monitors the medical information and nothing else.
While I agree that YouTube should be monitored, youβre making the same comment as someone in the 80s talking about cartoons on TV.
Meaningless argument.
Some one can say "I don't like Nazis" and then say "I don't like tomato soup" a week later. It doesn't mean you can compare the two.
Look, clearly you have some kind of weird idea going on that's leading you to misread what I'm saying, so let me just say it here clearly:
If you don't know about baby shark, that doesn't make you a bad parent. If you leave your infant/toddler sat in front of youtube for hours every day, you are probably a bad parent.
There. Now stop putting words in my mouth.
We're responding to the words you put into OP's mouth, with your holier-than-thou attitude.
i agree with you 100%, but baby shark was so viral, it reached every child, regardless if their parents used the screen as a babysitter
Granted. That still doesn't make it make sense to tell people that if they don't know about baby shark they're bad parents.
I'll take the benefit of doubt and assume you're not a contrarian asshole and just took a wierd interpretation.
The interpretation I got (and most people based on the comments) is that the audience did not get it because they do not take care of their children so they aren't aware of viral songs anymore with children have heard.
I edited my initial comment. I did indeed have a weird interpretation born from unfortunate experience and ignorance.
Parents using a screen as a babysitter is child abuse. I never done that with my kids, we did watch TV together, and I shared stuff I liked, but not once leave them unnatended.
Absolutely hated when my ex did that, especially because how toxic the YouTube "watch next" algorithm is for kids. even with YT kids.
You, seemingly deliberately, misunderstood my message.
Baby Shark was astoundingly pervasive and the only way to have missed out on it was to be belligerently unobservant.
Baby shark predates the internet, no? I learned it on a fieldtrip in the late dialup era, well before casual internet browsing was mainstream (at least for kids my age)
You got me curious so I looked it up, and you're right. Apparently it was a campfire song that's been around since like the 70s? I never heard of it until pinkfong put it on blast. Thanks for the education!
Yeah, we were singing it a long time before the internet was a thing accessible to children. It was passed down by those who went to camps along with such songs as "da moose da moose"
It hurts to read "The original song dates back to the 20th century" in the Wikipedia article.
Kids tend to like happy music. AND THEY WILL ASK FOR IT ON REPEAT. Mine wants APT. CONSTANTLY.
Nothing to do with videos, it is about the music.
its talking about taking part in your kids interests, not letting yt babysit them.
After some reflection and research I have edited my above comment.