"Shooting back against people who shoot you is against international law."
this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
79 points (100.0% liked)
Slop.
817 readers
408 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Damn it really is just like domestic law, the cops can kill you and you're not allowed to do anything back
applies to the world police too.
"International law is a shield for a rogue state that has spread terror at home, in the Middle East, and across the globe"
"you're talking about america right?"
"you're talking about america right?"
Or Israel?
Or any of the states assisting usa/Isreal
Then there are the 85 Canadians killed aboard Ukraine International Airlines Flight PS752 on Jan. 6, 2020 by the IRGC. Six years and a sham trial later, Iran has still not come clean on what happened that night.
Isn't it plain that this this happened because Iran was on high alert and mis-detected the aircraft? And why were they on high alert? Because we drone struck and assassinated general Soleimani.
comes off pretty hollow coming from the country that has never apologized for shooting down an Iranian commercial flight and killing 290 people (I think the captain of the ship that fired the missile was even awarded a medal)
Don't forget Bush Sr.'s response of "I'm not an apologize for America kind of guy"
For those thinking I might be exaggerating, I'm not; he literally said this and people literally cheered
America is basically an alternative lord of the rings where Sauron won and the orcs and goblins took over
Don't forget Bush Sr.'s response of "I'm not an apologize for America kind of guy"
"I'll never apologize for the United States - ever! I don't care what the facts are."
Yes. That accident can be laid at the feet of the amerikkkans
“The law is broken because the law doesn’t legalize me getting to steal scary brown people’s oil!”
If you imagine them wearing red wool coats and pith helmets every time they complain about “the rules” it really helps dial in their perspective
We are 4chan, we are all-powerful, omniscient edgelords! We have now taken over the government to enact out eeeeevil plans
turns out the “based and redpilled” types are just neocons.
The article begins by citing a guy that married an insider Zionist, someone that worked for the founders of Likud. And himself a naked Zionist and therefore promoter of settler colonial genocide.
But yes they're very concerned about international law. "Won't someone bring civilization to these savages?", they lament.
Fuck klanada. Of course its the globe and mail lmao 
Wait, I'm confused. I thought we didn't give a fuck about international law anymore. Why even bother making an article about it?
Hooollly shit, projecting so hard The Last Action Hero is about to kick off
ok honestly turn the gavel in this article image into a handle and Iran's shape makes for a pretty cool battle axe
And then put 
underneath it
Broken because reality disagrees and lies don't hold up in court?