this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
323 points (99.1% liked)

News

36491 readers
1939 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The exterior of the Eldon B. Mahon U.S. Courthouse in Fort Worth, Texas, seen during the Prairieland protest trial on March 9, 2026. Photo: Matt Sledge/The Intercept Federal agents raiding the home of two alleged antifa “operatives” seized a telling piece of evidence, a defense attorney said during closing arguments in a landmark trial Wednesday.

A printing press.

That printing press was never presented to jurors. Still, the government has kept it locked away because it hated the pamphlets and zines it published, lawyer Blake Burns said.

Burns represents Elizabeth Soto, one of nine defendants whose fates were in the hands of jurors as deliberations began Thursday. All are accused of roles during or after a late-night noise demonstration outside Prairieland Detention Center, a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility near Dallas that ended with a local police officer wounded by gunfire.

The case has become a bellwether for the Trump administration’s crackdown on dissent from the left. The government charged people involved with the anti-ICE protest with a slew of charges, including attempted murder and terrorism counts that defense attorneys said are being used to criminalize protest.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

But wearing cargo shorts, red arm bands, brandishing weapons, bringing IED's, dressing in upper body tacticool clothing, and storming the capital looking to hang Mike Pence is just good ol' fashioned protesting right?

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

Wilhoit's Law:

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Correct.

"Say, since you're already all dressed up to play the part, President Trump has another important mission he needs you to take care of. You ever been to Iran?"

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I kind of wish that would be the scenario. That would be doing what Covid didn't.

[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

That's definitely the scenario. It's not going to be just Trump supporters, but making pro-war military propaganda an inescapable aspect of civilian life is meant to help normalize forever wars.

If you grow up knowing nothing but a world where forever war is the norm, and a dictator just does whatever the fuck he wants, then by comparison whatever Trump, (or Vance, or Rubio, or Hegseth, or whoever the next polished turd is that oligarchs choose to be his replacement), does next, always seems a little less outrageous than what he did the time before. It just becomes the new normal.

It's hard to believe there are some people who honestly think there's just no way Trump (or whoever is next) would reinstate the draft because it would be "political suicide." People would be out in the streets again.

I remember hearing my parents and older family members saying shit like that. They also didn't think there would be any way Roe vs. Wade would be overturned in their lifetime. Or that America would ever see a repeat of something like Kent State. But it happened. It just becomes the new normal.

Iran looked very different before the CIA intervened. We were always told that the religious fundamentalism that took hold was a consequence of a failed U.S. intervention, but I'm pretty sure things went according to somebody's plan.

It's never been that religious fundamentalism (in Iran or the U.S.) is actually important to the religious values of those who use it to control others. It's important to preserving a conservative heirarchy. The Americans who created the Iranian revolution viewed themselves as Gods (or at least as close to God as humanly possible within the heirarchy of humans) meant to control and lead the rest of society. They recognized a long time ago that religion and nationalism are simply the tools that enable them to shape and control a society into their image.

Tldr: You might not fall for the propaganda, but keep in mind that others will. Once they get to a certain point of enmeshment, it becomes like trying to bring a brainwashed cult member back to reality.

[–] TwodogsFighting 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Bet the judge was wearing black.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Bet the cops are too

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I'm going to have to change my wardrobe, almost everything I wear is black. There's a bit of color on my black sneakers, though, I'm not completely rigid about it.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 4 hours ago

Ever look on a New Yorker's closet? Almost all black, with a little color hanging at the end. For holidays, I guess.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 hours ago

Coming for the Amish, are they?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The jury now has an opportunity to do a funny thing

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

In Texas? That'd be nice.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago
[–] Thrydwulf@lemmy.today 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fashion police? In my Nazi party? More likely than you think.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Goths vs Nazis rumble on the construction site for the new white house high school gymnasium.

The Outsiders 2026

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 13 hours ago

If you listen closely you can hear a bald eagle being mutilated. Fuck this shit

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 80 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (4 children)

This is why I say the best protest outfit is a clown costume. One: big baggy clothes that you can hide body armor and other utilities underneath. Two: face paint that hides you from facial recognition. And three: the cops are gonna look like idiots beating a clown.

And if you want a fourth reason, your friends can paint all your faces the same so you’re harder to identify in the crowd.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago

They don’t care that they look cruel, cruelty is the point. They gassed an inflatable frog, choked out high schoolers, dog-piled Captain America, shot clergy, and show zero restraint around children and the elderly. Even before Trump they have savaged POC, women, LGBTQ, and teenagers with mohawks. Shame requires both a sense of right and wrong as well as some sort of consequence to make it work. Cops have been given carte blanche to be violent, and even if they do it for pleasure rather than the state will have their actions publicly defended by the state, and their moral compass is “might is right”.

No matter how one dresses or what actions they engage in during a protest, the new definition of terrorism is defying and disagreeing with the regime. Had the defendants all dressed like clowns the prosecution would have made the case that dressing like a clown is terrorism.

[–] kayzeekayzee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 17 hours ago

The last part is the main point of wearing all black.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago

your friends can paint all your faces the same

No they can't!

That would be plagiarism!

One clown, one egg!

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 14 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

And three: the cops are gonna look like idiots beating a clown.

Not a clown with body armor and other utilities. You just end up making Juggaloes a terrorist organization.

[–] duncan_bayne@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

You just end up making Juggalos a terrorist organization.

It's all upside then!

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 14 points 17 hours ago

Didn't the courts already determine that like a decade ago? Not saying I agree with it, but I seem to remember this already being a thing.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The armor and utilities go under the suit. By the time the truth comes out the cops already look stupider.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

By the time truth comes out once, you've just condemned clowndom.

Edit: Unless you are considering making it an official military uniform of a breakaway political faction, in which case you've just rewritten the meaning of "send in the clowns".

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Everyone who joins our military is already a clown, so why not make it official

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I am in fact suggesting that.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Clown ~~car~~ APC, deploy

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net -1 points 13 hours ago

Whoop whoop!

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 39 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well, you wonder why I always dress in black Why you never see bright colors on my back And why does my appearance seem to have a somber tone

Well, there's a reason for the things that I have on I wear the black for the poor and the beaten down Livin' in the hopeless, hungry side of town I wear it for the prisoner who is long paid for his crime

But is there because he's a victim of the times I wear the black for those who've never read Or listened to the words that Jesus said About the road to happiness through love and charity

Why, you'd think He's talking straight to you and me Well, we're doin' mighty fine, I do suppose In our streak of lightnin' cars and fancy clothes But just so we're reminded of the ones who are held back Up front there ought to be a man in black

Trump: He's a terrorist. Lock him up and throw away the key.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Well obviously he's a terrorist, he implied that prisoners are capable of having paid for their crime

[–] DABDA@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In for a penny, in for a pound.

If they're going to bring such heavy charges carrying such serious prison time for typical protesting actions (or apparel‽) it might just convince some people that any restraint is unnecessary and to "earn" their sentences. I get that the current assumption is that is the unspoken goal to claim additional legal power but there doesn't seem to be much hope left that things won't escalate there even without a "proper" inciting incident.

[–] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

An interrobang‽ In the wild‽ Thank you for that!

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I have a shortcut on my phone that every time I type a question mark followed by an exclamation mark it changes to the ‘bang. It’s fun.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

This whole time people thought cops were racist. Who knew? Turns out they don't hate black PEOPLE, they just hate the color black! Totally different type of hate!

........ugh. All jokes aside, we live on the dumbest planet. I'd leave if I could.

[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 14 hours ago

Rock is not a crime

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

the more they use that term, the less meaning it has.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 1 points 3 hours ago

This is their strategy. Whenever the right is doing something vile, they will repeatedly accuse the left of committing the same sort of acts. They will scream long and loud that the left is committing terrorist acts, and with the power of the accusation weakened by overuse, they can simply hand-wave away any similar accusation leveled at them. They've been doing this kind of thing for a long time now. "Every accusation is a confession" isn't just an amusing observation. It's literally their strategy.

[–] Encephalotrocity@feddit.online 1 points 18 hours ago