
Slop.
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

It's amazing how porn brained people will admit they are openly. But also like just look at porn dude. Just watch people fuck. Like are you jerking it to God of war? Really? That's something important to you? To jerk it God of war??? Like I play video games because they are fun. These people apparently only do so to make themselves horny...

Some people want everything to be porn, but I genuinely believe that most of this internet discourse isn't about wanting to jerk off but about wanting to reject the idea that a woman can be valuable as anything but a sex object or perhaps home-maker. The point is to deny the humanity of women and constantly reaffirm that they need to be pleasing to misogynists in order to be anything but disgusting.
Absolutely true in the end. It's about controlling what a woman is allowed to be. Which is of course just as pathetic.
Rhetorically though if I ever argue with these "people" in real life or otherwise I will only ask them why they need to jerk it to God of war. Because that is what they present and it becomes self evidently pathetic. Or they can admit to the control above and that leads to them being obviously pathetic.
Will this change their minds? Of course not generally but it will:
-annoy or even enrage them which is good because fuck em I hope they are always uncomfortable
-amuse me
-(small chance these days) change the mind of onlookers who haven't thought about it.
I think even if you don't focus on it, mentioning the real point is still productive from a "helping onlookers" perspective.
You may be right there.
it's the same reason they hate onlyfans models. they keep a greater share of the money from customers, can block customers they don't want, and can choose to only do/post what they're comfortable with. even though there's still plenty of free porn out there, the chuds see female sex workers in a position with more autonomy and dignity than sex workers have traditionally had, and it bothers them.
Agreed
The primary problem for them is the idea a woman can be depicted as a human. It's not about being horny, it's that they don't want games to appeal to anyone except horny straight racist white guys.
It’s all out of revenge because Anita Sarkeesian slighted their egos. Now they demand all media panders to heterosexual white men exclusively to punish someone who pointed out a trend.
Hell hath no fury like a white man scorned.
"first they came for my boobas..."
They want it to be porn because games are the most sex they ever have.
"woke God of War"
God of Woke was right there but no, god these guys fucking suck in every possible way
It’s such a small but telling example of how empty their creative tanks are that they can’t even squeak out a pun.
I like when they do this and it just looks like 
begging someone to bimboify kratos


I think the left design is boring and drab. Where tf are the colors. But the one on the right is absurd. I would think so even if I wanted a sexy design.
Again we come back to the concept art on the left is still a beautiful woman, but chud incels can't accept anything below "bimbo fetish".
That image has its colors desaturated, in game her top is bright yellow and her hair appears more red. Although maybe that's the aesthetic they'll be going for for the next game, like maybe the whole thing takes place in britain and it's constantly foggy and overcast.
Maybe he just cares about drag queens representation in video games
Gamers are awesome
Devs from gaming companies form unions because the workers need better pay and benefits, and who do Gamers side with when inserting themselves into a situation that has nothing to do with them? They side with the company AGAINST the people making their games, and then they cry when the people who make their games flip them off and just make the game they want to make.
I love Gamers man, they're the best
It would be hilarious if gaming companies made an ad for this to really drive the point home, where they show a bunch of these crybabies complaining about the new game only to have this character come out and gleefully beat them all up and humiliate them as being hardly men.
Way too many gamers see devs as equivalent to a waiter bringing them out a chocolate lava cake.
Just publicly airing out that you're a big ol' pervert who objectifies women. God I wish I was this bold in parts of my life that matter, like advocating for myself or trying to get better at things.
And being so self-serious about it.
Like these are literally the same people who agree with Angela Martin on everything.
They endorse KOSA and say “think of the children! Anything that isn’t Barney the Dinosaur is too spicy to be shown to the public!” but also “what if sin was legal but just for me? I’m special after all!”
Bidoof’s law. It’s pure comedy gold that every IRL Angela Martin is just…openly and shamelessly addicted to porn and insist their horniness is 100% jeebus approved.
Groups the law binds but does not protect, groups the law protects but does not bind, and so on
they can't fool me, that's laura loomer
Jarvis, give her giant tits and 2008 Victoria’s Secret model makeup 
Chuds when black person in videogame: "NOT REALISTIC!! MY IMMERSION!!!¡!*
Chuds when game set in antiquity: "THIS FEMALE NEEDS SURGICALLY ALTERED TITS AND MAKEUP!!!!"
only thing im suprised by is i thought she was a redhead and more buff and had stronger shoulders
obviously this guy's AI redesign is fucking ridiculous
That's definitely how she looks in the last game, the artist here went for muted colors.
I'm still not convinced this account isn't an elaborate bit.
We sure this isn’t a bit? Looks like a bit.
The(really one of many) problem with chuds is you cant tell
I really want to turn this trend on its head somehow. Like making an alternate reality Andrew Tate who is a poet or some such shit. I don't know...
I'm going to say it, the weird Voldemort face caked in makeup that AI always generates looks creepy and off-putting, not sexy. If these guys looked at her face instead of her boobs for even a second they'd notice how creepy and uncanny valley it looks.
They really should be able to tell even without leaving the boobs
The words "people" and "we" are doing a lot of lifting here
Motherfucker's still got nothing better to do? Pathetic.
I cannot believe this isn't irony, or some form of satire. I literally can't believe there are people who believe the right is the standard body.
Not to mention that if the woman in the right actually existed she would be treated as stupid or chad-collecting or something
Damn well maybe you can have Grok fix you some bitches, too. If you actually expect women to date you, you don't meet the bare minimum.
Grok can make porn of women (minus genitals) like my guy you can make up women whole cloth to get horny and coom over, you don't need bideogame.
I won't even get mad at this. Not worth the energy.
I finally got it! These types tend to see themselves as “the cool kids” of the internet….just get some actual normies and just point and laugh. These types are failed chads, so get some actual chads and laugh.
In a normal world. The fact someone decided that 75% of the population deserves to die in no small part because they see every example of a woman in vidya without massive tits as an attempt to get revenge on men should be comedy gold. I’m sick of pretending these losers are normal.