this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
27 points (93.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46809 readers
526 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Should all monopolies be split into different companies which would be given to the workers who would collectivize them?

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago

I think we need to go back to the regulations in the 70's where no company could own more than one type for an area. one newspaper, one radio station and one tv station.

[–] yogurt@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

It's the same thing Discovery did in the first place. This is the last moment of TV having value before the boomers are dead so Discovery merged with Warner to make a big ball of shit that Netflix would have to buy if they wanted Game of Thrones and Superman. Paramount doesn't want to be left out so they're adding all their shit to the ball and they'll try to sell it to Netflix again in 2 years.

[–] Just_Lyin@lemmy.org 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A consolidation of power in the media sector. Good for those who want to control narratives. Bad for the dissemination of opposing viewpoints, and thus bad for regular people. Same as it ever was.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I am 100% convinced that Ellison chased this deal specifically for control over CNN.

Now the Reich wing has control over most tv media outlets. All they need is to obtain MS Now and they'd have everything.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What does Marx think of corporate consolidation?

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

Considering he's dead, probably not much.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TehBamski@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I'm so glad that I wasn't the only one that recognized this from a bygone era in animation.

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago

I think that mergers like this only ever benefit those who are responsible for taking the money out of the companies beforehand.
I believe that there has never been a merger of two near equally terrible companies that has ever benefited the consumers or the general public. It is almost always geared to getting a small number of investors paid.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 23 hours ago

Terrible, it should never be allowed that companies can grow this large.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Death to monopolies

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

BoJack Horseman should've had a happy ending in which BoJack gets his life back on track thanks to him living with Diane.

[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

This is the Orbanization of media, in Hungary Orban gave broadcasting licenses to only those who supported him. Here in America instead of using licenses as the mechanism they’re just using money to do the same thing. America needs a serious discussion on trust busting to start breaking up big businesses. Be ready for CNN to become Fox News light.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

It will be a Paramount Discovery of new ways to make movies and TV suck.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 0 points 12 hours ago

I'm happy to hear Netflix is not acquiring more. I'm not so sure about Paramount and Warner merging though. Could have been worse I guess.

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I think that the top tier actors that are making statements on social media or when accepting their awards should put their money where their mouth is and work with smaller independent companies that can make this an opportunity to grow.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I’m going to drop my HBO sub and hope others do the same. The right is buying all the truth-telling media and shareholders need to feel this one deeply.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Monopolies should be treated with a heavier hand than what they are in the US currently.

I don't agree with just confiscating property without due process and I definitely don't agree with using tax payer money to buy out the current owners just to give it to the workers.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

This is a billionaire buying the good name of trusted companies so he can have a propaganda house that isn't obviously such.

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Brought to you by Bill Clinton's Telecom Reform Act. Something like this would have been illegal before then.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 hours ago

Al Gore should've been President in 1993.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 1 points 17 hours ago

He'd say "I've had a wonderful evening, but this wasn't it."

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have mixed thoughts. Overall I anticipate it being a net negative. Mergers like this result in fewer jobs, lower quality products and less competition. However I love movies (check my profile if you want proof) and specifically I love going to the movie theater. Paramount has continued supporting movie theaters which is more than you can say about Netflix and Sarandos. Likewise Zaslav was just making anti-consuner decisions left and right. I can count on more than one hand the amount of times I've called that man a piece of shit. Not to mention Netflix's slavish attachment to "the algorithm" just churns out a lot of slop

So while the merger is bad it's probably the better of the two options and anything that reduces David Zaslav's power is a net positive in my book, even if he makes a small country's worth of money doing it

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

However I love movies

if you love movies, you should hate every merger... ALL mergers are about buying market share and eliminating competition, with no competition you will get whatever slop they think will be commercially successful and call it a day (just look at all the great IP domain Disney has ruined via acquisitions)

[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Overall I anticipate it being a net negative. Mergers like this result in fewer jobs, lower quality products and less competition

I mean... I led with that. I don't like the merger, but I like it more than Netflix acquiring them. There are takes beyond black and white

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

hmmmm I don't see there is much room here beyond black and white...

As is, the industry would compare to 2 fairly ill individuals that still manage... after the merger it would be like having one terminal patient, one with terminal brain cancer or the other with advance Alzheimer; a difference with no distinction at that point