this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
225 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

19892 readers
541 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 56 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Explanation: During the Cold War, the USA and USSR competed in many areas to 'prove' whose system was superior. One such area was the so-called "Space Race", wherein both sides competed for prestigious 'first achievements' in space. The USSR put up the first satellites and people into space, but the USA was the first to land people on the moon.

... for some reason, an enduring minority in the US has continued to believe that it was a 'hoax' and 'faked', for gods only know what reason. The USSR, by contrast, was watching the whole affair very closely - once it was apparent that the mission was a success, genuine congratulations were extended, and samples of moon rocks were shared with USSR when the mission touched down. After all, the competition was about the prestige - science knows no borders*!

*unless it has some military application, at which point it becomes classified

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Like, a telescope will show the proof. Look at the moon, all the landing sites are on the planet facing side.

[–] Mr_Fish@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That only works if you believe the moon is real, which a shockingly high number of people don't

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I've got cheese in my fridge, I can stare at that

[–] UniversalFlamingo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Wait. What?!

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They'll just move the goalposts. When my sister went QAnon crazy she started spouting all sorts of bullshit like the moon landing being fake.

I pointed this out to her, and she just insisted that later moon missions were real and planted evidence for the faked early ones. I also pointed out OP's point (if the landing was faked, the USSR would have called out that bullshit) but she insists she's smarter than the KGB.

I don't speak with her anymore.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

My favorite thing is "We wouldn't have had the technology to go to the moon in 1969"

So Apollo 12 (1969) 14 (1971) 15 (1971) 16 (1972) 17 (1972)

Were all fake too?

So we faked the first moon landing and then proceeded to fake 5 more moon landings in 3 years?

That sounds real smart

[–] CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think any Earth-based telescope would be able to see anything we left at the landing sites.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 5 points 1 month ago

Yep, the article mentions as much. You'd have to trust public access to NASA telescopes, which no self-respecting conspiracy theorist would, of course.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, but no.

As you're well aware, no telescope on Earth can see the leftover descent stages of the Apollo Lunar Modules or anything else Apollo-related. Not even the Hubble Space Telescope can discern evidence of the Apollo landings. The laws of optics define its limits.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh look we got another flat mooner here

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The soviet premier to the yanks, upon hearing this : oh dear. Oh precious.
To their scientists : you fucking donkeys

[–] Klear@quokk.au 1 points 1 month ago

Not "another happy landing"?