this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
20 points (88.5% liked)

TechTakes

2567 readers
185 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, hope you had a wonderful Valentine's Day!)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago

new episode of odium symposium. we look at rousseau's program for using universal education to turn woman into drones

https://www.patreon.com/posts/project-1789-150782184

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apparently some of our AI Safety cult "friends" are planning a protest in London on 28th of February.

Is it going to be something worth critically supporting instead of the usual criti-hype? Possible, but not likely.

The AI Safety movement is finally changing by ~~Sillyconversations~~ Siliconversations.

Who?

I used to be a quantum scientist and now I'm a YouTuber. My parents are thrilled.

Oh, okay.

Also curious that they're not protesting Anthropic on the thumbnail. A cynic would say they're giving them free pass because they say the right shibboleths.

They're giving them free pass because they say the right shibboleths.

[–] lurker@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the AI safety crowd cuts Anthropic way too much slack. Oh, they’re not running CSAM-generating MechaHitler? Oh, they’re not collaborating with the US government to recreate 1984? I’m so proud of them for doing the bare minimum. They still took donations from the UAE and Qatar (something Dario Amodei himself admitted was going to hurt a lot of people, but he took the donations anyways because “they couldn’t miss out on all those valuations”), they still downloaded hundreds of pirated content to train their chatbot. They’re still doing shady shit, don’t let them off the hook because they’re slightly less evil than the competition

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] corbin@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

As far as I can tell, it's run by right-wing Russians who are willing to falsify or edit archived data and who attack anybody who looks into them.

[–] o7___o7@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (5 children)
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

they’ve jumped the shark a while back. ptorrone is relatively widely documented to go around harassing people (often using his partner as a shield excuse for doing so, just like this time), and a couple months back they sold to qualcomm

This person “Charlie Stross”

ah yes, that absolutely must be a pseudonym, and absolutely couldn’t be a real person

such a fucking weird bit

anyway yeah fuck adafruit. don’t buy their shit, there are other options (and often cheaper)

e: I derped on the who-sold, conflated the two for dipshittery. see subthread

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] istewart@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Somebody vibe-coded an init system/service manager written in Emacs Lisp, seemingly as a form of criticism through performance art, and wrote this screed in the repo describing why they detest AI coding practices: https://github.com/emacs-os/el-init/blob/master/RETROSPECTIVE.md

But then they include this choice bit:

All in all, this software is planned to be released to MELPA because there is nothing else quite like it for Emacs as far as service supervision goes. It is actually useful -- for tinkerers, init hackers, or regular users who just want to supervise userland processes. Bugs reported are planned to be hopefully squashed, as time permits.

Why shit up the package distribution service if you know it's badly-coded software that you don't actually trust? 90% of the AI-coding cleanup work is going to be purging shit like this from services like npm and pip, so why shit on Emacs users too? Pretty much undermines what little good might come out of the whole thing, IMO.

[–] TrashGoblin@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago

Every time an LLM-related package appears on ELPA I die a little more inside.

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

need a word for the sort of tech 'innovation' that consists of inventing and monetizing new types of externalities which regulators aren't willing to address. like how bird scooters aren't a scam, but they profit off of littering sidewalk space so that ppl with disabilities can't get around

EDIT: a similar, perhaps the same concept is innovation which functions by capturing or monopolizing resources that aren't as yet understood to be resources. in the bird example, we don't think of sidewalk space as a capturable resource, and yet

In economic terms it's less rent seeking and more rent creation. Like, taking advantage of public sidewalk space may not be a rent in the strictest sense given that the revenue model is still people paying for the service, but the ability to provide that service is absolutely predicated on taking over and monopolizing this public resource to the maximal degree possible.

By historical allegory, harkening back to the original destruction of the Commons, we're looking at Enclosure 2: Frisco Drift.

Let's also not lose sight of the fact that those sidewalks aren't a natural formation, and that it's the city government who ultimately takes on the burden of their construction and maintenance. This kind of neo-enclosure of public resources is then another kind of invisible subsidy.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nfultz@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Russ Wilcox is not impressed by the Mass AI bill:

https://russwilcoxdata.substack.com/p/i-read-every-line-of-massachusettss

Four: create a private right of action. Let deepfaked candidates sue. Give them access to injunctive relief and takedown authority. If someone fabricates your face and your voice to destroy your campaign, you should be able to walk into a courtroom.

Hell yeah we need this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nfultz@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] gerikson@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Last megathread I posted about some LWer writing about "demographic collapse" in Japan (indistinguishable from anyone with any ambition leaving for greener pastures). I've read the comments to see if there's any pushback, and found this absolute doozy

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FreZTE9Bc7reNnap7/life-at-the-frontlines-of-demographic-collapse?view=postCommentsNew&commentId=Gbfu5BGaZMwXFey7h

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lurker@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Somebody on bsky talking about various Ben Goertzel Epstein file emails.

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

Goertzel discusses with Epstein future scenario for "an AGI economy":

"for the AGI parasite to overcome to regular-human-economy host (so it can grow to be more than a parasite and eventually gain its own superhuman autonomy) it first needs to suck off the resources of the host"

The Rationalists!

[–] mirrorwitch@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago

Starting the week with this fairly extensive compendium of intractable issues with LLMs: GenAI has an Alignment Problem… But it’s not the machine’s hostility we need to worry about.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›