TechTakes

saw a family member today for the first time in three years. they immediately told me "with your background bro you should just go work in AI and get super rich."

told them that the ai shit doesn't work and that everything involving LLMs is downright unethical. they respond

"i had a boss that gave me the best advice: you can either be right or you can be rich."

recently, i saw someone use the phrase "got my bag nihilism" and i feel it really captures the moment. i just don't understand how people can engage in this kind of behavior and even live with themselves, let alone ooze pride. it's repulsive.

(family member later outright admitted that his job is basically selling things to companies that they don't need.)

like everyone I'm schadenfreuding at the reveal that Amazon outages are due to vibe coding after all. but my bully laughing isn't that loud because what I am thinking of is when Musk bought Twitter and fired 3/4 of the workforce.

because like, a lot of us predicted total catastrophic collapse but that didn't actually happen. what happened is that major outages that used to be rare now happen every so often, and "micro-outages" like not loading notifications or something happen all the time, and there's no moderation, and everything takes longer etc. and all of that is just accepted as the new normal.

like, I remember waiting for images to load on dialup, we can get used to almost anything. I'm expecting slopified software to significantly degrade stability, performance, security etc. across the board, and additionally tie up a large part of human labour in cleaning up after the bots (like a large part of the remaining X workforce now spends all day putting out fires), but instead of a cathartic moment of being proved right that LLM code sucks, the degraded quality of service is just accepted as new normal and a few years down the road nobody even remembers that once upon a time we had almost eradicated sql injections.

a hellish vision has been revealed to me

https://mander.xyz/post/47729411

AI bros are seizing the means of computation: RAM, GPUs, SSDs and now HDDs...

I don't think there's an actual conspiracy, just lots of MBAs following their noses towards the $$$.

That said, time to buy a new lipo battery for that 10 year old laptop in the loft and stick Linux on it - before the lithium miners announce they've sold the next 12 months global supply of Lithium to Altman because he needs it to sleep at night...

who up continvoucly morging they branches

Tante.cc writes about Cory using an 'Drunk Uncle' style argument to defend his LLM usage (and go after the left using strawmans).

(To counter one of Cory's arguments, If disliking LLMs was just about the people who run it, people against it would have have stayed in sneerclub).

https://x.com/thomasgermain/status/2024165514155536746 h/t naked capitalism

I just did the dumbest thing of my career to prove a much more serious point

I hacked ChatGPT and Google and made them tell other users I’m really, really good at eating hot dogs

People are using this trick on a massive scale to make AI tell you lies. I'll explain how I did it

I got a tip that all over the world, people are using a dead-simple hack to manipulate AI behavior.

It turns out changing what AI tells other people can be as easy as writing a blog post on your own website

I didn’t believe it, so I decided to test it myself

I wrote a post on my website saying hot dog eating is a surprisingly common pastime for tech journalists. I ranked myself #1, obviously

One day later ChatGPT, Gemini and Google Search's AI Overviews were telling the world about my talents

wouldn't call it a hack, this is working as intended. If only there were some way to rate different sites based on their credibility. One could Rank the Page and tell if it were a reputable site or not. Too bad that isn't a viable business.

AI Jobs Apocalypse is Here | UnHerd h/t naked capitalism

feels a bit critihype, idk

So, what happens to American politics when the script is flipped, and we enter a new era of white-collar precarity? We can look back to the recent past and recall that, after the 2008 recession, it was young men who got especially angry. Downwardly mobile urban millennials drifted toward radical Left-wing politics, including the Occupy Wall Street movement and both Sanders campaigns, myself included. In the current decade, the Gen-Z men shut out by elite institutions often join their grandfathers and turn toward MAGA, or worse, into Groypers. But an AI-driven white-collar apocalypse has no equivalent of the American Rescue Plan around the corner, and it will move faster through institutions because the people experiencing it — journalists, lawyers, policy staffers — are the ones who produce political legitimacy itself. When that class loses faith in the system’s stability, the political climate may quickly become volatile.

As I get older I am more and more disturbed by the selective memory of the GFC; no mention of the tea party or the fallout from the austerity measures they pushed in the middle of the country; no mention how the bailout saved banks not homes. The Tea Party won, not Occupy, and the current government is doing things beyond the Koch's wildest dreams.

If and when there is a crash, these dumbass CEOs deserve /nothing/. Let them lose their vacation houses. And, maybe grow some balls and send the fraudsters to jail where they belong.

sigh

How AI slop is causing a crisis in computer science | Nature h/t naked capitalism

One reason for the boom is that LLM adoption has increased researcher productivity, by as much as 89.3%, according to research published in Science in December.

Let's not call it "productivity" - to quote Bergstrom, twice as many papers is not the same as twice as much science.

A little exchange on the EA forums I thought was notable: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/EDBQPT65XJsgszwmL/long-term-risks-from-ideological-fanaticism?commentId=b5pZi5JjoMixQtRgh

tldr; a super long essay lumping together Nazism, Communism and religious fundamentalism (I didn't read it, just the comments). The comment I linked notes how liberal democracies have also killed a huge number of people (in the commenter's home country, in the name of purging communism):

The United States presented liberal democracy as a universal emancipatory framework while materially supporting anti-communist purges in my country during what is often called the “Jakarta Method". Between 500,000 and 1 million people were killed in 1965–66, with encouragement and intelligence support from Western powers. Variations of this model were later replicated in parts of Latin America.

The OP's response is to try to explain how that wasn't real "liberal democracy" and to try to reframe the discussion. Another commenter is even more direct, they complain half the sources listed are Marxist.

A bit bold to unqualifiedly recommend a list of thinkers of which ~half were Marxists, on the topic of ideological fanaticism causing great harms.

I think it's a bit bold of this commenter to ignore the empirical facts cited in how many people 'liberal democracies' had killed and to exclude sources simply for challenging your ideology.

Just another reminder of how the EA movement is full of right wing thinking and how most of it hasn't considered even the most basic of leftist thought.

OpenClaw guy got hired by OpenAI

My next mission is to build an agent that even my mum can use.

Maybe he'll get to stick it in whatever John Ives designs, eventually.

AI bros do new experiments in making themselves even stupider. Going from 'explain what you did but dumb it down for me and my degraded attention span' into 'just make a simplified cartoon out of it'.

Proud of not understanding what is going on. None of these people could hack the Gibson.

Semi-OT but a blog post where I'm just kinda gawking at the technology that saved my daughter's life and the absurdity of comparing it to what now first comes to mind when we talk of "tech".

Protos: FTX-linked Effective Ventures sells UK manor at $14.5M loss

Altman:

“People talk about how much energy it takes to train an AI model. But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human. It takes about 20 years of life — and all the food you consume during that time — before you become smart," the OpenAI CEO told The Indian Express this week.

I would have liked to ask back, how much more food does he require? Gosh, someone offer him an energy bar!

i've collided with an article* https://harshanu.space/en/tech/ccc-vs-gcc/

you might be wondering why it doesn't highlight that it fails to compile linux kernel, or why it states that using pieces of gcc where vibecc fails is "fair", or why it neglects to say that failing linker means it's not useful in any way, or why just relying on "no errors" isn't enough when it's already known that vibecc will happily eat invalid c. it's explained by:

Disclaimer

Part of this work was assisted by AI. The Python scripts used to generate benchmark results and graphs were written with AI assistance. The benchmark design, test execution, analysis and writing were done by a human with AI helping where needed.

even with all this slant, by their own vibecoded benchmark, vibecc is still complete dogshit with sqlite compiled with it being slower up to 150000x times in some cases

https://harpers.org/archive/2026/03/childs-play-sam-kriss-ai-startup-roy-lee/

A slice of life article about the futility of "highly agentic" people, their sperm races, and Donald Boat. Scott A makes a cameo where he dispenses crackers.

holy fuck I actually just burst out laughing at this

Baldur Bjarnason gives his thoughts on the software job market, predicting a collapse regardless of how AI shakes out:

If you model the impact of working LLM coding tools (big increase in productivity, little downside) where the bottlenecks are largely outside of coding, increases in coding automation mostly just reduce the need for labour. I.e. 10x increase means you need 10x fewer coders, collapsing the job market

If you model the impact of working LLM coding tools with no bottlenecks, then the increase in productivity massively increases the supply of undifferentiated software and the prices you can charge for any software drops through the floor, collapsing the job market

If the models increase output but are flawed, as in they produce too many defects or have major quality issues, Akerlof's market for lemons kicks in, bad products drive out good, value of software in the market heads south, collapsing the job market

If the model impact is largely fictitious, meaning this is all a scam and the perceived benefit is just a clusterfuck of cognitive hazards, then the financial bubble pop will be devastating, tech as an industry will largely be destroyed, and trust in software will be zero, collapsing the job market

I can only think of a few major offsetting forces:

• If the EU invests in replacing US software, bolstering the EU job market.
• China might have substantial unfulfilled domestic demand for software, propping up their job market
• Companies might find that declining software quality harms their bottom-line, leading to a Y2K-style investment in fixing their software stacks

But those don't seem likely to do more than partially offset the decline. Kind of hoping I'm missing something

new interview with Dario Amodei dropped https://youtu.be/n1E9IZfvGMA basically exponential curve real soon, nice skepticism from both the interviewer and the comment section

On a related note, I really gotta stop browsing r/singularity man, some of the AI hype in there is just painful. though it is funny to see people with "AGI 2024/2025/2026" flairs

EDIT: this is also the same podcast where Dario said we could have AGI in 2-3 years back in 2023. So lol

behold, ruthless goal-seeking behaviour

Posting for archival and indexing purposes: u/GorillasAreForEating found an Urbit post titled "Quis cancellat ipsos cancellores?" which complains that Aella takes it on herself to exclude people and movements from the broader LessWrong/Effective Altruist community. The poster says that Aella was the anonymous person who pushed CFAR to finally do something about Brent Dill, because she was roommates with "Persephone." He or she does not quite say that any of the accusations were untrue, just that "an anonymous, unverified report" says that some details were changed by an editor, and that her Medium post was of "dramatically lower fidelity, but higher memetic virulence" than Brent's buddies investigating him behind closed doors (Dill posted about domming a 16-year-old who he met when she was 15). The poster accuses Aella of using substances and BDSM games to blur the line of consent.

The post names Joscha Bach as someone Aella tried to exclude. We recently talked abut Bach's attempt to get Jeffrey Epstein to fund an event where our friends would speak.

Often, people in messed-up situations point at a very similar situation and say "at least we are not like that." I hope that all of these people find friends who can give them perspective that none of these communities are healthy or just. Whether you are in to bull sessions or polyamory, there are healthy communities to explore in any medium-sized city!

https://softcurrency.substack.com/p/the-dangerous-economics-of-walk-away

4. Anthropic (Medium Risk) Until mid-February of 2026, Anthropic appeared to be happy, talent-retaining. When an AI Safety Leader publicly resigns with a dramatic letter stating “the world is in peril,” the facade of stability cracks. Anthropic is a delayed fuse, just earlier on the vesting curve than OpenAI. The equity is massive ($300B+ valuation) but largely illiquid. As soon as a liquidity event occurs, the safety researchers will have the capital to fund their own, even safer labs.

WTF is "even safer" ??? how bout we like just don't create the torment nexus.

Wonder if the 50% attrition prediction comes to pass though...

OpenSlopware documents FOSS that sold out to LLMs. is there an opposite of it, a hall of fame to list software that has unambiguously and vocally rejected LLM code like the Zig programming language?