I thought it was for Bozo
Who knows. The only thing that came to my mind reading that is the joke "statement made by utterly deranged". And then I realized there is no joke.
It was supposed to. I'm just not that good at writing.
Yeah, neural network training is notoriously easy to reproduce /s.
Just few things can affect results: source data, data labels, network structure, training parameters, version of training script, versions of libraries, seed for random number generator, hardware, operating system.
Also, deployment is another can of worms.
Also, even if you have open source script, data and labels, there's no guarantee you'll have useful documentation for either of these.
I am neither left nor right wing, as I’m a libertarian
Ah, yes, the classic "I'm not like the other girls" of politics.
It would be funny if someone was literally beating up servers with a wooden shoe.
Then there is John Michael Greer...
Wow, that's a name I haven't heard in a long time.
A regular contributor at UnHerd...
I did not know that, and I hate that it doesn't surprise me. I tended to dismiss his peak oil doomerism as wishing for some imagined "harmony with nature". This doesn't help with that bias.
The first paragraph surprised me. I didn't know there were still some true believers left.
YAML is great if you need to make simple configuration files
... which is why no one uses it for things like Kubernetes /s
Automattic... that's why there are two t's!? Jesus Christ.
Just something I found in the wild (r/machine learning): Please point me in the right direction for further exploring my line of thinking in AI alignment
I'm not a researcher or working in AI or anything, but ...
you don't say
That article gave me a whiplash. First part: pretty cool. Second part: deeply questionable.
For example these two paragraphs from sections 'problem with code' and 'magic of data':
Well, "just read the dataset bro" sound great sounds great until you are staring at a dataset with 100 000 examples and someone is asking you to interpret it.