this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
434 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28225 readers
2316 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has repeatedly pledged to slash the national deficit and curb debt during his second term, but a sobering assessment of the nation’s financial health by one of the federal government’s premier fiscal watchdogs suggests Trump 2.0’s policies have not only collectively pushed the federal deficit significantly higher, but put the country on an unsustainable path.

In its latest budget and economic outlook, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan federal agency, revised its cumulative deficit projection for the 2026–2035 period upward by $1.4 trillion compared with its forecast from just a year ago.

“Our budget projections continue to indicate that the fiscal trajectory is not sustainable,” CBO Director Phillip Swagel said in a statement, noting the agency’s latest projections. Under laws passed in Trump’s first year back in office, the national debt in 2030 will surpass the historic high of 106% of GDP, which it reached in 1946. Meanwhile, the balance of Social Security’s Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted in 2032, one year earlier than the CBO projected last January.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Who would have thought the king of bankruptcy would have done this!?

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

Remember when conservatives at least pretended to be fiscally conservative?

Now it's 100% a bigot platform. No room left for pretending about actually governing.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I swapped most of my savings to Euros instead of American Dollars. A member of my residence thinks that is a weird move. Hopefully, one of us will be wrong.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

simple solution to fix social security, at least, is to remove the cap on contributions, so the billionaires can pay their share.

I dont know what the fuck we're gonna do about the debt though.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Deficit spending has historically worked out well because the US has been able to borrow at a rate lower than inflation, making it actually cheaper to borrow money and pay it off later. The national debt isn't much of a concern unless we tank our credit and reputation.

So it's a huge fucking concern.

[–] MartianHills@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

My understanding is that our debt burden now equals our GDP with interest payments about 1 trillion dollars annually. Looks like we're headed into a debt spiral with an economy stalling. Not an economist, but it seems like a worst-case scenario.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Thats okay, we're also tariffing the fuck out of everyone and alienating any and every trading partner to the point they are seeking to replace us with alternatives.

Surely that will fix everything.

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Yep. Everyone is in the "get out" - phase right now. Tariffs was a weapon for economic war against another country. Trump uses it on allies. Your president and vice president, litterally calling EU blood suckers, and blames us for your horrors. Even though we litterally only bought american tech, infrastructure, militiary equipment, entertainment, etc. To please the united states for keeping us safe. Now you say we gave you Nothing back. This is not a great way of treating trading partners.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

But think about all the bribes and money he was able to personally slurp up. Sure, we'll have to shoulder the burden as American citizens, but won't it be worth it if he can afford another golden toilet?

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

That is the right american mindset right there! USA is a great economy, as long as the 1% gets even more rich. When they get richer, the 99% gets more crumbs. As it should be.

[–] Nebraska_Huskers@lemmy.world 14 points 22 hours ago

I've given up people not being able to see evidence right in front of their faces or ignoring it just because it doesn't agree with their sense of reality it's just so enraging exhausting I'm so tired I just can't anymore if Republicans want to just burn everything to the ground fucking whatever. Even if dems gain control they're not going to do anything to reverse any of the damage he's done

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No worries, the genius American people will blame this on Obama.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

What will happen is that Americans will completely ignore this until a president of the opposite party gets elected and is left trying to fix this crap. Then suddenly it's like "look how incompetent this party is! We're so in debt right now!".

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

That's exactly right. Assuming we get another election a dem will be in power when this shit starts hitting the fan so that's all maga will blame it on.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How's all that winning going for you lot? Feel great yet?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wait until you see hyper-inflation!

"I'd like a Venti Lat-tahy"

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

When burning your money makes more sense cuz firewood is too expensive, that's hyper-inflation lol.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 106 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Running the US into the ground just like his businesses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptocracy

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It's exactly what Warren Buffett said about him; an interviewer in 2016 asked: "What do you think about Trump winning the presidency, he's a businessman"

Buffett laughed and says: "Yeah, every business he has run, he run straight into the ground." (Still thinking it was a theoretical question)

Reporter goes: "Yes, but he is President Elect"

Buffett's smile just kinda melted as he realized the new "business" he would be running, was the U.S.

(The full interview is difficult to find, so I found a short one minute snippet remaining on YouTube)

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 6 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean let's just put them together as what they truly are, since according to Bannon this all started from 4chan. Kekistocracy

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Watch the FBI know Q was Epstein or Bannon or Moot all along

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Already happening so they can muddy the waters and spin off more conspiracy theories to discredit the Epstein Files already obtained. Just like the Fortnite account that's likely still being used by whoever took over Epstein's sex trafficking ring to recruit more children.

https://reason.com/2026/02/11/epstein-files-fbi-tracked-down-anonymous-4chan-conspiracy-theorist/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/statement-announcing-epstein-s-death-was-dated-the-day-before/ar-AA1VVpnh

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/4chan-user-posted-about-jeffrey-epstein-s-death-it-was-n1041931

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not even convinced he's dead anymore. We have a photo of him supposedly dead morticians are calling bullshit on and upon closer inspection of the notes photographed in his cell he seems to have been planning an escape. And more connections to the CIA and Israel as a cherry on top.

https://youtu.be/qSKeLdtBY-4

Would really love to know what is censored.

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He's dead. Otherwise Ghislaine wouldn't have the leverage she does.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There's specific note about a computer in palm beach with G next to it 😅

[–] in_my_honest_opinion@piefed.social 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Alright, you're gonna believe what you're gonna believe. Just don't fall down any Qanon-like rabbit holes. Be well internet stranger.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 13 hours ago

Not high odds but it's now in the realm of possibility. 4chan.com/pol/ where Qanon originates was created the day Epstein met Moot and drove him home.

I'm not blindly believing I'm reading and watching people tear through millions of pages in parallel. I thought keeping him alive was silly until this morning. It way overcomplicates everything. And yet here we are

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

Didn't putin do something similar while seizing power?

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He's balancing the budget. Fake news. And that ten million, he deserves it. And those children he had sex with, he only did it to get Epstein arrested. We know the snowflakes don't like it when we get upset at them not speaking the way we want. They need a safe space from us trying turn America into a place that is secure for white christian people to never be disagreed with or competed with. The bluehairs can't handle us wasting our gasoline we complained costs too much when we roll coal on them. Lol haha sorry libturds you can't call us names anymore.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I sincerely hope this is satire because I've met people that think this way.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Trump: Wanna see some magic?

MAGA: Sure.

Trump: Look over there it's an immigrant!

MAGA looks

Trump pickpockets

MAGA: Hey, where's my wallet?

Trump: Oh look, it vanished and it's now in my pocket! What a magic!

MAGA: You're so great!

[–] FancyPantsFIRE@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I predict the administration will take this feedback and examine ways to… just kidding, there will be deranged posts, threats, and some kind of ham handed attempt to take over or disband the CBO.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Don't forget the 1000 mentions of passing the blame to Biden and how much they have to spend to revive the country or something like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But I heard the SNP is $50,000! They just don’t wanna talk about that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Blondi was talking about the Dow Jones when she was trying anything and everything to distract for her coverup on behalf of the Epstein Class.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 11 points 1 day ago
[–] rogsson@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

So what they’re saying is really this is Bidens and Obamas fault? Diaper Donnie had nothing to do with this surely. lol

[–] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My bet is that as the economy falters further and the world abandons US treasuries, he's going to make things even worse with QE and forcing rate cuts. Problem is that I have no idea what to do with that prediction. Plant beans and stock up on iodine?

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I am investing in ways to make my future costs lower. For example, I have solar on my house. It covers about half of my bill, and will for the foreseeable future. I am looking into additions to solar, as I live in Alaska, and need to figure out winter times.

I am looking into heat pumps, they aren't great for dead of winter, but they might eliminate shoulder season heat costs.

We buy the best quality, and locally produced food and goods we can, to help support our health and our community resilience.

Buy once, cry once, whenever we can, because replacement of stuff will be harder.

We live beneath our means, and take the money we save being boring and pay off debt, so that we truly own what is ours, because someday, paying a mortgage or for a vehicle, might be too difficult.

Practice using what you have, instead of buying stuff to solve your problem. Ingenuity is something that can be learned and practiced, but isn't something that comes naturally to people.

Learn to make stuff, or about your surroundings. If you live in a place you can forage, learn about what you can eat in your area to supplement what you have to buy.

Plan to be a poor person, because that is a situation that is likely, and that you can survive.

Most people will not make it, if we wind up in a situation where you are dependent on what you plant, and goods you stock up on. That stuff is just prolonging the inevitable. Total independence is just not a thing most people are prepared for mentally, or have the skills to pull off. So, prepare for a future where luxuries are limited, material goods are in short supply, and you have to figure out how to make do with what you have.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

I am looking into additions to solar

a lot of places have little windmills here, if that works for you. they're relatively inexpensive and easy to maintain. the biggest concern is where the shadow goes (the pulsing shadow of the blades is not fun that hour it's on you) but more modern blade designs have helped eliminate that

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I am super interested in wind, but not sure if my house gets enough. My city is pretty windy in some areas, but I don't often get a ton.

Do you have them yourself?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

nah, we're fortunate enough to get our needs met by solar. there are more than a few farms outside town that have windmills. I should have a working bicycle on monday, i can bike out and take some photos of the one i have in mind. it's 20-30 feet tall, mostly aluminum. pretty sturdy. I think they have a sign out by it because they are tired of folk knocking their door and asking questions (we have a friendly enough community).

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Oh holey moley. That is a big windmill! I need like.. a rooftop windmill, or.. a couple rooftop windmills.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

iirc that is the rooftop windmill. it's pretty narrow. it's not one of those giant 100 foot ones with 35 foot blades

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›