this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
435 points (99.5% liked)

politics

28225 readers
2241 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has repeatedly pledged to slash the national deficit and curb debt during his second term, but a sobering assessment of the nation’s financial health by one of the federal government’s premier fiscal watchdogs suggests Trump 2.0’s policies have not only collectively pushed the federal deficit significantly higher, but put the country on an unsustainable path.

In its latest budget and economic outlook, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), a nonpartisan federal agency, revised its cumulative deficit projection for the 2026–2035 period upward by $1.4 trillion compared with its forecast from just a year ago.

“Our budget projections continue to indicate that the fiscal trajectory is not sustainable,” CBO Director Phillip Swagel said in a statement, noting the agency’s latest projections. Under laws passed in Trump’s first year back in office, the national debt in 2030 will surpass the historic high of 106% of GDP, which it reached in 1946. Meanwhile, the balance of Social Security’s Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund will be exhausted in 2032, one year earlier than the CBO projected last January.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I am investing in ways to make my future costs lower. For example, I have solar on my house. It covers about half of my bill, and will for the foreseeable future. I am looking into additions to solar, as I live in Alaska, and need to figure out winter times.

I am looking into heat pumps, they aren't great for dead of winter, but they might eliminate shoulder season heat costs.

We buy the best quality, and locally produced food and goods we can, to help support our health and our community resilience.

Buy once, cry once, whenever we can, because replacement of stuff will be harder.

We live beneath our means, and take the money we save being boring and pay off debt, so that we truly own what is ours, because someday, paying a mortgage or for a vehicle, might be too difficult.

Practice using what you have, instead of buying stuff to solve your problem. Ingenuity is something that can be learned and practiced, but isn't something that comes naturally to people.

Learn to make stuff, or about your surroundings. If you live in a place you can forage, learn about what you can eat in your area to supplement what you have to buy.

Plan to be a poor person, because that is a situation that is likely, and that you can survive.

Most people will not make it, if we wind up in a situation where you are dependent on what you plant, and goods you stock up on. That stuff is just prolonging the inevitable. Total independence is just not a thing most people are prepared for mentally, or have the skills to pull off. So, prepare for a future where luxuries are limited, material goods are in short supply, and you have to figure out how to make do with what you have.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I am looking into additions to solar

a lot of places have little windmills here, if that works for you. they're relatively inexpensive and easy to maintain. the biggest concern is where the shadow goes (the pulsing shadow of the blades is not fun that hour it's on you) but more modern blade designs have helped eliminate that

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I am super interested in wind, but not sure if my house gets enough. My city is pretty windy in some areas, but I don't often get a ton.

Do you have them yourself?

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

nah, we're fortunate enough to get our needs met by solar. there are more than a few farms outside town that have windmills. I should have a working bicycle on monday, i can bike out and take some photos of the one i have in mind. it's 20-30 feet tall, mostly aluminum. pretty sturdy. I think they have a sign out by it because they are tired of folk knocking their door and asking questions (we have a friendly enough community).

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh holey moley. That is a big windmill! I need like.. a rooftop windmill, or.. a couple rooftop windmills.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

iirc that is the rooftop windmill. it's pretty narrow. it's not one of those giant 100 foot ones with 35 foot blades

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

For example, I have solar on my house.

I was looking at the same. Some naysayer I know was saying it would never pay back before the panels "failed".

Of course, he was assuming that the panels would fail with 100% certainty at a certain period of time. He was also assuming that electricity costs are going to stay stagnant. If I have a battery backup installed, that obviously rejiggers things, and I'm assuming they not last very long, either at least when it comes to the timelines one talks about in regards to things like houses.

I am definitely not going to assume that, LOL. That hasn't even been true in the past year alone, nevermind what some of the more negative predictions have for how costs will be impacted by things like data centers.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Added solar to my house in 2018. Took out loan for over $20k, had it paid off in a year or two thanks to the SRECs generated by the wHs of the array. Doubt anyone in US could see that now under this clean coal regime, but it could be done well before the conveyed panel efficiency bullshit that likes to be thrown around. Technology Solutions on YT had a video recently that absolutely destroyed a bunch of the common detractors that like to be thrown around.

I can link the SolarEdge page for my array a little later today to show what a 7.2 wH (I think) system produces over 6-ish years, if it helps.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll have to look for that video, sounds interesting.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah early photovoltaic solar panels weren't great, in the same way early ev batteries weren't great. They've become far longer lasting and more efficient. The listed life isn't when it craps out, it's when it is no longer guaranteed to be within a certain stated efficiency. Much like how phone batteries slowly lose charge capacity as cells break, that's how solar panels are. For a long time you won't notice but eventually it'll break down enough it's noticeable, and eventually before it stops producing it'll just not be worth the space that could be used for new panels.

[–] ARealAlaskan@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, the 'payoff time' on mine is long, but I am betting they last much longer than that, and that energy prices won't scale normally. I really want sodium ion batteries to work out, but they are sounding less promising.

We have a big natural gas shortage looming here, and most homes are heated with it. Such an obvious thing to be trying to prepare for, sure heat pumps won't heat all winter here, but... If I can generate heat using my free electricity 2 or 3 of the months needing heat a year, that is a permanent discount, that only gets better as costs go crazy. People around me don't really seem to be thinking this way.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I live in Colorado and so probably different heating/cooling circumstances, but people also don't seem to be thinking about future costs of energy either.

Now, it could be that things turn around, Donvict is out of the picture, and we have a huge boom in solar and wind and through legislation or just from the market being saturated, prices drop. But given the way that things are going right now thanks to the utterly insane Republicans, all I see is those guys fighting against the future in every way possible while they stand aside and let Donvict and his criminal family just grift their way to billions of dollars of ill-gotten gains.